Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews, March 1999, p. 54-105, Vol. 63, No. 1
Department of Microbiology & Molecular
Genetics and the Markey Center for Molecular Genetics, University
of Vermont, Burlington, Vermont 05405
1092-2172/99/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1999, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
Cdc42: An Essential Rho-Type GTPase Controlling
Eukaryotic Cell Polarity
SUMMARY
INTRODUCTION
CDC42P STRUCTURE AND FUNCTIONAL DOMAINS
Identification of Cdc42
Cdc42Hs Three-Dimensional Structure
GTP Binding and Hydrolysis Domains
Effector Domain
GEF Interaction Domains
PRENYLATION AND SUBCELLULAR LOCALIZATION
FUNCTIONAL STUDIES
Saccharomyces cerevisiae
Mitotic cell cycle.
Mating pathway.
Pseudohyphal and invasive growth.
Schizosaccharomyces pombe
Candida albicans
Caenorhabditis elegans
Drosophila
Mammals
Actin rearrangements.
Cdc42p and the JNK/SAPK and p38 MAP kinase cascades.
Ras-mediated transformation, cell cycle progression, and
apoptosis.
Cdc42p and Nef-dependent HIV replication.
Cdc42p/JNK pathway and ion homeostasis.
Cdc42p and host cell responses to bacterial invasion.
CDC42P REGULATORS
Guanine Nucleotide Exchange Factors
S. cerevisiae Cdc24p.
(i) Cdc24p-Rsr1p/Bud1p interactions.
(ii) Cdc24p-Bem1p interactions.
(iii) Cdc24p-Ste4p interactions.
S. pombe GEF.
Drosophila and C. elegans
GEFs.
Mammalian GEFs.
GTPase-Activating Proteins
S. cerevisiae Cdc42p GAPs.
Drosophila and C. elegans
GAPs.
Mammalian GAPs.
Guanine Nucleotide Dissociation Inhibitors
S. cerevisiae Rdi1p.
Mammalian GDIs.
CDC42P DOWNSTREAM EFFECTORS
PAK-Like Kinases
S. cerevisiae PAK-like kinases.
(i) Ste20p.
(ii) Cla4p.
(iii) Skm1p.
S. pombe PAK-like kinases.
Drosophila and C. elegans
PAK-like kinases.
Mammalian PAK-like kinases.
ACK tyrosine kinases.
Bni1p and Bnr1p Formins May Function as Scaffold
Proteins
IQGAPs as Scaffold Proteins Mediating Cdc42p-Actin
Interactions
S. cerevisiae Iqg1p/Cyk1p functions during
cytokinesis.
Mammalian IQGAPs mediate Cdc42p-calmodulin-actin
interactions.
Wiskott-Aldrich Syndrome Proteins Mediate Actin
Rearrangements
S. cerevisiae Bee1p/Las17p.
Mammalian WASPs.
Other Effectors
Gic1p and Gic2p.
Zds1p and Zds2p.
Bem4p/Rom7p.
70-kDa S6 kinase.
CDC42 AND HUMAN DISEASE
CONCLUSIONS AND FUTURE RESEARCH DIRECTIONS
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
REFERENCES
SUMMARY
|
|
|---|
Cdc42p is an essential GTPase that belongs to the Rho/Rac subfamily of Ras-like GTPases. These proteins act as molecular switches by responding to exogenous and/or endogenous signals and relaying those signals to activate downstream components of a biological pathway. The 11 current members ofthe Cdc42p family display between 75 and 100% amino acid identity and are functional as well as structural homologs. Cdc42p transduces signals to the actin cytoskeleton to initiate and maintain polarized gorwth and to mitogen-activated protein morphogenesis. In the budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Cdc42p plays an important role in multiple actin-dependent morphogenetic events such as bud emergence, mating-projection formation, and pseudohyphal growth. In mammalian cells, Cdc42p regulates a variety of actin-dependent events and induces the JNK/SAPK protein kinase cascade, which leads to the activation of transcription factors within the nucleus. Cdc42p mediates these processes through interactions with a myriad of downstream effectors, whose number and regulation we are just starting to understand. In addition, Cdc42p has been implicated in a number of human diseases through interactions with its regulators and downstream effectors. While much is known about Cdc42p sturcture and functional interactions, little is known about the mechanism(s) by which it transduces signals within the cell. Future research sould focus on this question as well as on the detailed analysis of the interactions of Cdc42p with its regulators and downstream effectors.
INTRODUCTION
|
|
|---|
The establishment of cell polarity is an important component of the overall process of cellular morphogenesis, the complex process by which the three-dimensional organization of subcellular constituents, which ultimately determines an organism's characteristic growth patterns and shape, is generated and maintained. The generation of cell polarity is critical for the control of many cellular and developmental processes such as shape development in early plant and animal embryogenesis, axon migration and neurite outgrowth in early development, the intracellular movement of organelles and proteins in polarized epithelial cells, the stimulated secretion of neurotransmitters, the directed movement of migratory cells, polarized growth within yeast and fungal cells, and the asymmetric partitioning of new cellular constituents during cell division. Establishment of cell polarity involves the generation of cellular asymmetry through the localized temporal and spatial activation of cellular processes and can be divided into several hierarchical and interdependent events. These events include the initial response to endogenous and/or exogenous signals, the determination of an axis of polarization relative to these signals, and the subsequent asymmetric distribution of cellular components along that axis. At the molecular level, cell polarity is best understood in the budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae, but results from studies in fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe, Drosophila, Caenorhabditis elegans, and cultured mammalian cells strongly suggest that the molecular mechanisms controlling cell polarity in S. cerevisiae are highly conserved in other eukaryotes. Due to the abundance of recent reviews on cell polarity and signaling (26, 69, 77, 100, 126, 170, 177, 202, 216, 218, 246, 281, 346, 347, 350, 382, 464, 465, 467, 511, 520, 587) and on the roles of Rho-type GTPases in these processes (46, 61, 120, 141, 171, 186, 192, 225, 241, 288, 290, 325, 326, 337, 344, 419, 441, 473, 477, 478, 544, 550, 552, 572, 578, 638, 644). I will limit this review to a discussion of the Cdc42p GTPase, its identification, its structure and subcellular localization, its function(s) in controlling cell polarity, and its regulators and effectors.
It is becoming increasingly apparent that the Cdc42p
GTPase and other Rho-type GTPases play a vital role in
regulating the signal transduction pathways that control the generation
and maintenance of cell polarity in many, if not all, eukaryotic cell
types. The Cdc42p GTPase signaling module consists of regulators of
the guanine nucleotide-bound state of Cdc42p, i.e., guanine nucleotide
exchange factors (GEFs), guanine nucleotide dissociation inhibitors
(GDIs), and GTPase-activating proteins (GAPs), as well as
downstream effectors of Cdc42p function (Table
1). The regulators of the guanine
nucleotide-bound state of Cdc42p must respond to a variety of exogenous
and/or endogenous signals, thereby activating Cdc42p to a GTP-bound
state or inactivating it to a GDP-bound state. A myriad of Cdc42p
downstream effectors interact with the activated (GTP-bound) form
of Cdc42p, thereby inducing a number of downstream events, including
rearrangements of the actin cytoskeletal network and protein
kinase-dependent induction of transcription, which are increasingly
coming into view. Interactions between the 21-kDa Cdc42p GTPase and
this host of regulators and effectors must be controlled in a temporal
and spatial manner so that Cdc42p can function at different times within the cell cycle and at different places within the cell. Cdc42p
function is also regulated by its subcellular localization, which
depends on its prenylation state and interactions with its GDI.
|
CDC42P STRUCTURE AND FUNCTIONAL DOMAINS
|
|
|---|
Identification of Cdc42
The Cdc42p GTPase was first identified from an S. cerevisiae mutant strain carrying a temperature-sensitive (ts) mutation, cdc42-1ts, that blocked bud formation at 37°C but allowed the cell mass and volume to increase, resulting in greatly enlarged, unbudded cells (2). Although cell division was arrested at 37°C, DNA replication and nuclear division continued into the next cycle, resulting in multinucleate cells as determined by DNA staining with the fluorescent dye 4',6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) and mitotic spindle staining with anti-tubulin antibodies. Fluorescence microscopy with rhodamine-conjugated phalloidin showed that the polarized organization of the actin cytoskeleton (i.e., cortical actin distribution to the regions of new cell growth in the bud and actin cables directed into the enlarging bud) was disrupted, indicating that Cdc42p functioned in the organization of the actin cytoskeleton, which is necessary for polarized cell growth. Chitin and other cell surface materials were deposited uniformly throughout the enlarging cell walls, in contrast to their normal polarized patterns of deposition. Growth of the cdc42-1ts strain at semipermissive temperatures led to a small percentage of cells with elongated buds. Taken together, these observations suggested that Cdc42p controls polarized cell growth during the cell cycle but that isotropic incorporation of new cell wall material was not impaired through the loss of Cdc42p function. Examination of the cdc42 null phenotype in S. cerevisiae and S. pombe indicated that Cdc42p was essential for viability (242, 390).
DNA and predicted amino acid sequence analysis (242) indicated that Cdc42p belongs to the Rho subfamily of the Ras superfamily of GTPases that act as molecular switches in the control of a variety of eukaryotic processes (191, 239, 241, 242, 642) (see below). At about the same time, a ~25-kDa guanine nucleotide binding protein was purified from bovine brain and human placental membranes (140, 461, 582), and peptide sequences from this protein, termed Gp or G25K, showed a high degree of similarity to S. cerevisiae Cdc42p (242, 461). This protein was shown to be a good in vitro substrate for epidermal growth factor (EGF)-stimulated phosphorylation (209), although the in vivo phosphorylation of Cdc42p has not been reported to date. Subsequent analysis of the predicted amino acid sequence from two independent human cDNA isolates indicated the existence of two highly conserved (95% identical) proteins, the ubiquitously expressed Cdc42Hs (525) and the brain isoform G25K (407). The Cdc42Hs and G25K proteins are identical in both nucleotide and predicted amino acid sequences up to amino acid 163 but diverge from residues 163 to 191, suggesting that these isoforms are differential splicing products of a single gene. Structural and/or functional Cdc42p homologs have subsequently been characterized in the pathogenic yeast Candida albicans (394), S. pombe (390), C. elegans (88, 500), Drosophila (336), chicken (Gallus gallus) cochlea (172), mouse (Mus musculus) liver (172) and brain (367), and dog (Canus familiaris) (GenBank accession no. Z49944), and these homologs are 80 to 95% identical in predicted amino acid sequence (241) (see below) (Fig. 1). S. pombe, Drosophila, and C. elegans Cdc42p, as well as Cdc42Hs and G25K, can complement the cdc42-1ts mutant (88, 390, 407, 507, 525), suggesting that Cdc42p may have conserved functions in these other eukaryotes.
|
The Cdc42 family of proteins currently has 11 members ranging in size
from 190 to 192 amino acids (Fig. 1A). Within this family, there is a
very high degree of sequence conservation, ranging from ~75% amino
acid identity between C. albicans Cdc42p and the human brain
isoform G25K to 100% identity between the dog, mouse, and human Cdc42p
and 100% identity between the mouse brain and human brain (G25K)
isoforms. Cdc42 proteins display ~40% similarity to other Ras-like
GTPases, but this similarity is clustered in the four domains
implicated in GTP binding and hydrolysis (Fig. 1, blue boxed
domains). The most obvious difference between Cdc42p and Ras protein
sequences in these domains is in amino acids 115 to 118. Ras proteins
contain the diagnostic sequence Asn-Lys-Xaa-Asp (NKXD, where X is any
amino acid), while all Cdc42p proteins contain the signature sequence
Thr-Gln-Xaa-Asp (TQXD, with X being predominantly an Ile residue). It
has been postulated that these differences may account for the
~10-fold-higher rate of GTP hydrolysis observed with Cdc42p
proteins than with Ras proteins (210), but this has not been
experimentally tested to date (see "GTPase-activating proteins" below). All Cdc42 proteins contain the C-terminal sequence Cys-Xaa-Xaa-Leu except for the two brain isoforms (Cdc42Mmb and G25K
[Fig. 1]), which end in a Phe residue. This conserved domain is
necessary for proper membrane anchorage of Cdc42 proteins (see "Prenylation and subcellular localization" below). Much that is known about the functional domains of Cdc42p has been determined by
analyzing gain-of-function, loss-of-function, and dominant negative
mutations (shown in Fig. 1). A compendium of these mutations, along
with their mutant phenotypes, is listed in Table
2.
|
Cdc42Hs Three-Dimensional Structure
The numerous cdc42 mutations analyzed to date (see below) have greatly aided in defining functional domains within Cdc42p. However, without the information derived from the crystal structure of purified Cdc42, these mutations do little to clarify the global structure of Cdc42 and hence the multiple interactions between Cdc42 and its regulators and effectors. This problem has recently been resolved with the determination of the solution structure of Cdc42Hs by nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy techniques (145), along with the determination of the X-ray crystal structure of Cdc42Hs bound to GDP (Fig. 1B) (413a). Several of the more interesting and informative mutations have been mapped onto the crystal structure (Fig. 1), and they highlight the potential functional domains of Cdc42p. The four domains implicated in the binding and hydrolysis of GTP are highlighted in blue in Fig. 1. The structure of these domains is similar to those found in the Ras and Rac crystal structures, highlighting the conservation of structure and function between different guanine nucleotide binding proteins.
Clearly, one of the more interesting and functionally important domains
is the effector or switch I domain between residues 26 and 50 (highlighted in red in Fig. 1) (see "Effector domain" below). This
domain forms an extended
2-strand/loop structure covering a large
proportion of one face of the molecule. Based on its extended
structure, it is easy to see how different effectors or regulators of
Cdc42p could bind to different subdomains of the effector domain,
possibly at the same time, as suggested by the analysis of different
effector domain mutations. One effector/regulator could be bound to the
N-terminal proximal domain around residue 35, which is in close
proximity to the bound nucleotide, while another could be bound to the
N-terminal distal region around residue 44. In addition, binding of an
effector protein to this domain could interfere with the binding of
other effector/regulator proteins to this domain, thereby providing a
basis for the regulation of the myriad of Cdc42-dependent cellular processes.
The domain that makes Rho-type GTPases unique within the Ras
superfamily is the so-called Rho insert domain (highlighted in purple
in Fig. 1). This extra ~13 amino acids is
-helical and has been
implicated in Cdc42 interactions with one of its downstream effectors,
the IQGAPs (379, 605), as well as its GDIs (605). In studies with a chimeric Cdc42Hs in which the insert domain between
residues 120 to 139 was replaced with residues 121 to 127 of Ha-Ras,
the resulting Cdc42Hs-
L8 protein showed a two- to threefold-reduced
affinity for the carboxyl-terminal (97-kDa) half of IQGAP1, which
contains the GRD Cdc42 binding domain (379, 605) (see
"Cdc42p downstream effectors" below). While this Cdc42Hs-
L8 protein did not exhibit altered interactions with Rho-GDI from the
perspective of the ability of Rho-GDI to extract Cdc42Hs-
L8 from
membranes, it had a greatly reduced sensitivity to the
Rho-GDI-dependent inhibition of GDP dissociation or GTP hydrolysis
(605). These results suggest that the insert domain is
mediating some of the effects of the Rho-GDI. Rho-GDI binding to
Cdc42Hs requires C-terminal prenylation (307) (see
"Mammalian GDIs" below), suggesting that Rho-GDI binds to the
C-terminal prenylation domain. The fact that the insert domain is on
the other side of the Cdc42 molecule from the C-terminal prenylation
domain (Fig. 1B) makes it likely that Rho-GDI binding induces a
conformational change in the structure of the insert domain, possibly
leading to the insert domain shifting its location to block the guanine
nucleotide binding pocket, thereby "locking" the Cdc42 protein in
either a GDP- or GTP-bound state and inhibiting GDP dissociation or
GTP hydrolysis (see "Mammalian GDIs" below). It is interesting
that Ras proteins do not have an insert domain and also do not seem to
have physiological interactions with GDI proteins. Recently, the insert
domain was shown to play a role in the ability of Cdc42 to transform
NIH 3T3 fibroblasts (606). The
L8 deletion mutation (see
above) could intragenically suppress the transforming ability of the
Cdc42F28L mutant protein without affecting its ability to
bind GTP, induce Jun N-terminal kinase (JNK) and p21-activated
kinase (PAK) activities, or induce filopodium formation (see
"Mammals" under "Functional studies" below). These results
further highlight the ability of Cdc42p to differentially function in
multiple cellular processes through interactions between its different
structural domains and downstream effectors (see "Cdc42p
downstream effectors" below).
In addition to the effector domain, Cdc24p and other GEFs interact with
Cdc42 through other domains, including residues 82 to 100, which
encompass the
4-strand-
3-helix region, and residues 140 to 150, which encompass the
4-helix. The
3- and
4-helices lie on the
same face of Cdc42p highlighted by the S86, W97, and G142 residues
(Fig. 1B, right). The dominant negative S86P mutation lies in the loop
region between the
4-strand and the
3-helix and it interferes
with interactions between S. cerevisiae Cdc42p and Cdc24p
(116). Interestingly, this loop region makes close contacts with residues in the Rho insert domain (see above), and this
region undergoes chemical shift changes in NMR spectroscopy studies upon binding of the nonhydrolyzable GTP analog GMPPCP (145), suggesting that it may be an additional switch region (i.e., switch III). The nature of the S86P dominant negative phenotype is unknown, but it is not due to sequestration of Cdc24p as is the
mechanism of action of the D118A mutant allele (116). The W97R (
3-helix) and G142S (
4-helix) mutations are ts
loss-of-function alleles in S. cerevisiae (391)
and although their mechanisms of action are unknown, the W97R
mutation leads to a bud site selection defect, implicating Cdc42p
in the initial selection of a nonrandom bud emergence site.
Taken together, these observations show that the face of
Cdc42p defined by the
3- and
4-helices plays a critical role in
Cdc42p function. The structure and function of the C-terminal membrane
localization domain (highlighted in green in Fig. 1) are
discussed below (see "Prenylation and subcellular
localization").
GTP Binding and Hydrolysis Domains
The Cdc42 domains involved in guanine nucleotide binding and GTP hydrolysis (blue boxes in Fig. 1) have been inferred through structural similarities to domains in other GTPases and through the analysis of activated and dominant negative cdc42 mutations. The initial cdc42 mutations were analyzed in S. cerevisiae (642) and were based on the paradigmatic Ras mutations that led to oncogenic transformation. The cdc42G12V and cdc42Q61L mutations are analogous to H-ras mutations that cause a decreased level of intrinsic GTPase activity, thereby shifting the mutant proteins to an "activated" GTP-bound state. In S. cerevisiae, these cdc42 mutations were lethal, resulting in large, multibudded cells with aberrant cortical actin structures localized in multiple buds (642). These phenotypes suggested that the mutant proteins were activated and constitutively interacting with downstream components of the pathway, leading to polarization, albeit incorrectly, of the actin cytoskeleton. The H-rasD119A mutation also leads to an activated phenotype; however, this phenotype was mechanistically due to an increased GDP dissociation rate, which is thought to result in a higher probability of the protein being in a GTP-bound state due to the higher concentration of GTP than of GDP in the cell. The phenotype of the S. cerevisiae cdc42D118A mutant was unexpected and different from the cdc42G12V and cdc42Q61L activated phenotypes. The cdc42D118A mutant phenotype was temperature-dependent dominant lethal and resulted in large, round, unbudded cells that were phenotypically similar to cdc42ts mutants grown at restrictive temperatures. This dominant negative phenotype suggested that the Cdc42D118A mutant protein could bind and sequester the cellular factor(s) necessary for the budding process (see "S. cerevisiae Cdc24p" below).
Expression of equivalent mutant proteins in S. pombe gave different results (390). First, unlike the activated and dominant negative phenotypes seen in S. cerevisiae, the morphological phenotypes of cells overproducing the cdc42G12V, cdc42Q61L, and cdc42D118A mutant gene products were similar to one another. Second, the mutant constructs did not exert a dominant lethal effect in S. pombe cells. Instead, S. pombe cells overproducing these mutant proteins exhibited an abnormal morphology of enlarged, round or misshapen cells with delocalized cortical actin structures, as opposed to the small, round cellular morphology of cdc42 loss-of-function and dominant negative mutants (390, 447). The cdc42D118A mutant phenotype also was temperature dependent in S. pombe, suggesting that the mutant protein loses either a critical interaction or its three-dimensional structure upon shift to higher temperature, leading to its mutant morphology. Interestingly, septum formation was still evident in these mutant cells, even though the presence of an organized actin ring was not, suggesting that septation can occur in the absence of an actin ring. However, this point must be clarified by experiments with either actin mutants or actin polymerization inhibitors such as latrunculin A.
While activated or dominant negative cdc42 mutations have not been analyzed in C. elegans to date, expression of the cdc42G12V allele in Drosophila ovaries led to defects in actin distribution whereas expression of dominant negative cdc42 alleles led to defects in actin organization in imaginal discs and wing hairs (see "Drosophila" under "Functional studies" below), reinforcing a role for Cdc42p in regulating actin function. For a discussion of mutations in mammalian Cdc42p, see "Mammals" under "Functional studies" below.
Effector Domain
The so-called effector domain between residues 26 and 48 of the Ras GTPase is required for downstream effector function (370, 460). The effector or switch I domain between residues 26 and 50 is highly conserved among Cdc42 proteins (Fig. 1A) but diverges among closely related but not functionally homologous Rac GTPases (239). The current paradigm is that GTPases bind to GEFs when in the nucleotide-free or GDP-bound state and bind to GAPs and downstream effectors when in the GTP-bound state. Since the switch I and II (residues 60 to 76) domains are the predominant regions of GTPases that change conformation upon binding different guanine nucleotides, it is likely that multiple factors interact with these regions. Given that Cdc42p interacts with multiple downstream effectors along with regulatory factors such as GEFs and GAPs (see "Cdc42p regulators" and "Cdc42p downstream effectors" below), it is likely that the specificity of interaction will be through either different residues within the Cdc42p effector domain, competition between effectors and regulators, and/or interactions at different times in the cell cycle.
A predominant binding partner for the effector domain is the CRIB (for
"Cdc42/Rac interactive binding") domain (also known as the PBD,
GBD, or PAK domain [see Table 3]) found in many Cdc42p downstream
effectors, including the PAK family of protein kinases (59).
The highest-efficiency binding domain in the CRIB-containing PAK
protein was residues 70 to 118, thereby defining the optimal CRIB
domain as these 48 amino acid residues (558). In these
studies, it was also shown that this domain interacted with Cdc42p at a ~3- to 10-fold-higher affinity than it interacted with Rac and that
it interacted with activated (Q61L) alleles at a 5- to 10-fold-higher affinity than it interacted with the wild type, reinforcing the notion
that CRIB-containing interacting proteins function as downstream effectors. A recent study in which NMR spectroscopy was used to probe
the interactions between Cdc42Hs and 46 amino acids of the PAK CRIB
domain showed that the CRIB binding domain surface on Cdc42Hs was
the
2 switch I domain and part of the loop between the
1-helix
and
2-strand (185). In addition, nuclear Overhauser effect contacts suggested that the formation of an intermolecular
-sheet was the basis for the Cdc42Hs-CRIB domain interactions. The CRIB domain of the Wiskott-Aldrich syndrome protein (WASP) downstream effector (see "Cdc42p downstream effectors" below) was dissected by a variety of biophysical techniques
including fluorescence spectroscopy, surface plasmon
resonance, circular dichroism, and NMR spectroscopy
(498). The results indicated that a core 26-amino-acid
fragment (residues 221 to 257) was necessary for binding to GST-Cdc42,
but higher affinity binding was observed with a larger (120-amino-acid)
fragment (residues 201 to 321), suggesting that the CRIB domain was
necessary but not sufficient for high-level binding. In addition, these
studies suggested that the isolated CRIB domain does not exhibit any
apparent secondary structure; it is unknown if the CRIB domain would
form a secondary structure, possibly
-strands (see above), within
the context of the entire protein.
Mutations that disrupt the interaction between Cdc42p and downstream effectors should define the effector domain and should suppress dominant activated cdc42G12V mutant phenotypes. The T35A allele was thought to be a paradigmatic effector domain mutation in that it could interfere with the ability of S. cerevisiae Cdc42p to interact with the PAK family of protein kinases and could suppress the dominant-activated cdc42G12V mutant but could not complement the loss-of-function cdc42-1ts allele. However, the T35A mutation also suppressed the dominant negative S. cerevisiae cdc42D118A allele and interfered with two-hybrid protein interactions between Cdc42D118Ap and the Cdc24p GEF (116), suggesting that the effector domain may also interact with the Cdc24p GEF. Corroborating this hypothesis are the results obtained with the Y32K and F37E mutations in the Cdc42Hs effector domain, which caused a loss of Cdc24-stimulated GDP dissociation (323), and the Cdc42Hs F28L mutation, which led to rapid nucleotide exchange and transformation of NIH 3T3 cells similar to that seen with the Cdc24p homolog Dbl (327). Interestingly, the T25K, N26D, and Y40K mutations within the Cdc42Hs effector domain did not show a loss of Cdc24-stimulated GDP dissociation (323), which could be a function of the individual mutational changes or could indicate a level of specificity at the individual amino acid residue for interactions with GEFs.
The S. cerevisiae cdc42V44A mutation represents
a new class of effector domain mutations in that it could complement
the cdc42-1ts allele (475a),
suggesting that it did not lead to a nonfunctional protein; it also
interfered with interactions with the upstream effector Cdc24p
(116). In addition, the cdc42V44A
mutant displayed a morphological phenotype of elongated buds with
multiple nuclei, which is suggestive of either a delay at the
apical/isotropic switch and morphogenesis checkpoint (see "S. cerevisiae" under "Functional studies" below)
and/or a defect in cytokinesis (475a). The V44A mutation
interfered with two-hybrid protein interactions between Cdc42p and the
S. cerevisiae Cla4p PAK-like kinase but not the Ste20p or
Skm1p PAK-like kinases and also between Cdc42p and the Gic1p and Gic2p
downstream effectors but not the Bnip or Iqg1p scaffold proteins (see
"Cdc42p downstream effectors" below). All of these proteins contain
CRIB domains, suggesting that the effector domain may differentially
interact with multiple CRIB domain-containing effectors. This
hypothesis is substantiated by mutations in the Cdc42Hs effector domain
that differentially affected interactions with mammalian downstream effectors (291, 379) (see "Cdc42p downstream effectors"
below). The Y40C mutation interfered with interactions between Cdc42p and downstream PAKs and other proteins containing CRIB domains, leading
to a loss of p65PAK kinase activation in transfected COS
fibroblasts, but it did not affect Cdc42p-dependent actin
reorganization, as evidenced by normal filopodium and integrin complex
formation in Swiss 3T3 cells (291). The D38E mutation
interfered with in vitro binding to an mPAK-3 CRIB domain peptide
(310) but had no effect on the binding of two other
downstream effectors, IQGAP1 and IQGAP2. The Cdc42Hs F37A mutation did
not affect interactions with CRIB-containing proteins or actin
reorganization (291). Taken together, these results suggest
that there are different classes of effector domain mutations that can
be distinguished by their morphological phenotypes and protein-protein
interactions. These different mutations may define interactions with
different effectors or regulators, thereby allowing us to dissect the
multiple pathways leading from Cdc42p (see "Cdc42p downstream
effectors" below). Given the possibility that the Cdc42p effector
domain interacts with CRIB-containing proteins through formation of an
intermolecular
-sheet (see above), it is likely that the nature and
orientation of amino acid side chains emanating from the
2 strand
(Fig. 1) have an influence on this differential binding. It should be
noted, however, that not all Cdc42p-interacting proteins contain
recognizable CRIB domains, suggesting that there may be multiple
mechanisms by which proteins interact with Cdc42p.
GEF Interaction Domains
In addition to the effector/switch I domain mutations that affect interactions between Cdc42 and its GEFs, there are mutations in other domains that affect either binding to GEFs or GEF-induced GDP dissociation. Mutations within the switch II domain, including D63L, D65K, R66D, R68A, P69A, and F78L, did not affect Cdc24-stimulated GDP dissociation, but the Q116K mutation in the Cdc42 signature GTP binding domain did (323). Analysis of chimeric Cdc42Hs-RhoA proteins indicated that residues 82 to 120 and 121 to 155 are necessary for Cdc24 responsiveness (323). Within the first domain, the S86P and S89P mutations in S. cerevisiae Cdc42p led to a cold-sensitive, dominant negative phenotype and, in the case of S86P, led to a loss of interaction with Cdc24p (116). Similar mutations in Drosophila Cdc42p also led to a dominant negative phenotype (see "Drosophila" under "Functional studies" below). Other mutations that led to a loss of interaction with Cdc24p in S. cerevisiae included the I117S mutation within the Cdc42 signature GTP binding domain and the T138A and L165S mutations (116). In addition, the C157R mutation within one of the highly conserved GTP binding domains led to a partially cold-sensitive dominant negative phenotype. The C-terminal membrane localization domain (see "Prenylation and subcellular localization" below) does not seem to be necessary for GEF interactions (323). Interestingly, the S86, S89, and T138 residues all lie on the same face of the Cdc42 protein (Fig. 1B), suggesting that this may be a conserved interactional interface between Cdc42p and its GEFs.
PRENYLATION AND SUBCELLULAR LOCALIZATION
|
|
|---|
In all organisms examined, Cdc42p is prenylated with a C20 geranylgeranyl isoprene group at a C-terminal Cys residue, and this prenylation is necessary for the membrane attachment of Cdc42p. S. cerevisiae and S. pombe Cdc42p fractionated into both soluble and particulate fractions, suggesting that Cdc42p can exist in two cellular pools (390, 643). S. cerevisiae Cdc42p was found predominantly in the particulate fraction, but a significant soluble pool, up to ~20% in some instances, could be observed. Given the existence of GDI proteins in S. cerevisiae and mammalian cells that can interact with Cdc42p and extract Cdc42p from membranes (see "Guanine nucleotide dissociation inhibitors" below), the soluble pool of S. cerevisiae Cdc42p is probably either nonprenylated or complexed with the rho-GDI protein Rdi1p (267, 373). The particulate form of Cdc42p could be solubilized by added detergent but not by added NaCl or urea, suggesting that Cdc42p was tightly associated with either a cellular membrane or a cytoskeletal complex. When synchronous cultures were used, the fractionation pattern of S. cerevisiae Cdc42p did not appear to vary through the cell cycle (643). However, recent studies indicating that Cdc42p functions at different places in the cell at different times of the cell cycle (see below) suggest that fractionation patterns may not be a very sensitive measure of Cdc42p localization.
By using Cdc42p-specific antibodies in immunofluorescence and immunoelectron microscopy, S. cerevisiae Cdc42p was localized to the plasma membrane at sites of polarized growth (642, 643). These sites coincided with the sites of cortical actin localization and included invaginations of the plasma membrane at the site of bud emergence, the tips of growing buds, and the tips of mating projections in pheromone-arrested cells (3, 259). This localization pattern was consistent with Cdc42p functioning in controlling polarized cell growth during the mitotic cell cycle and mating. Recently, functional green fluorescent protein (GFP)-Cdc42p fusion proteins have been localized to the mother-bud neck region in S. cerevisiae and the septum area in S. pombe, suggesting that Cdc42p also plays a role in cytokinesis and/or septation in both yeasts (508a). This localization of Cdc42p at different sites of polarized growth during the S. cerevisiae cell cycle, which is mirrored by the localization of the actin cytoskeletal network, suggests that the subcellular localization of Cdc42p is under temporal and spatial control during the cell cycle. It should be noted that Cdc42p localization to sites of polarized growth was not disrupted by incubation with the actin-depolymerizing drug latrunculin-A (21), suggesting that Cdc42p localization occurs independently of actin localization and of the structural integrity of the actin cytoskeleton.
S. cerevisiae Cdc42p contains the C-terminal 183Lys-Lys-Ser-Lys-Lys-Cys-Thr-Ile-Leu sequence which is essential for the membrane localization of Cdc42p. In the Cdc42Hs NMR and crystal structures, this region forms a flexible tether that is separated from the body of Cdc42Hs by two Pro residues at positions 179 and 180 (145) (Fig. 1B), thereby allowing the bulk of Cdc42p to be sterically unhindered by membrane attachment and accessible for binding to other proteins. This region is modified by geranylgeranylation at the Cys188 residue (indicated by an underbar in the above sequence), which is necessary for its anchoring within the plasma membrane (147, 643). This is thought to be followed by proteolytic cleavage of the last three amino acids and carboxyl methylation of the now C-terminal Cys residue, although this has not been experimentally shown with S. cerevisiae Cdc42p (see below). The geranylgeranylation is deemed necessary because the C188S mutation, which renders the protein incapable of being prenylated, can intragenically suppress the dominant lethality associated with the cdc42G12V, cdc42Q61L, and cdc42D118A mutations (642) and because the S. cerevisiae and S. pombe Cdc42C188S mutant proteins, either by themselves or as GFP-Cdc42C188Sp fusion proteins, are nonfunctional, delocalized proteins that fractionate almost exclusively into soluble pools (508a, 642, 643). Whether this prenylation is sufficient for Cdc42p targeting to the sites of polarized growth is not known.
An increase in soluble S. cerevisiae Cdc42p was observed in
cdc43-2ts (643) and
cdc43-5ts (434) mutant cell extracts,
suggesting that membrane localization of Cdc42p depended on
Cdc43p-dependent geranylgeranylation. Cdc43p was originally identified
by ts mutations that led to cell cycle arrest of large,
unbudded cells, a phenotype similar to cdc42ts
mutants (2). In addition, cdc43ts
cdc42ts double mutants displayed a synthetic lethal
phenotype at 23°C, suggesting that these gene products may interact.
Another mutation in CDC43, designated cal1-1, was
identified by its calcium-dependent phenotype (437); the
cal1-1 mutant required 100 mM CaCl2 for growth.
The predicted amino acid sequence of the CDC43/CAL1 gene (240, 435) showed significant similarity to the
S. cerevisiae DPR1/RAM1 gene (173),
which encoded the
subunit of the protein farnesyltransferase
(FTase), which modified the C termini of Ras GTPases. Type I
protein geranylgeranyltransferase (GGTase I)
activity was reconstituted from Escherichia coli cells that
overproduced both Cdc43p and Ram2p (377, 539, 540), and
S. cerevisiae GGTase I activity was decreased in
cdc43ts and ram2 mutants but not
ram1 mutants (147, 377, 434), indicating that
Cdc43p and Ram2p encoded the
and
subunits, respectively, of the S. cerevisiae GGTase I. The Ram2p
subunit
also acts as the
subunit for the S. cerevisiae FTase
(214), which may account for the in vitro and in vivo
cross-specificity that is observed between FTase and GGTase I
activities in S. cerevisiae (66, 565).
S. cerevisiae GGTase I is an Mg2+-requiring
Zn2+ metalloenzyme (377, 539), but it can also
function with Ca2+ as the only divalent cation
(377). Added Ca2+ could not rescue the reduced
in vitro GGTase I activity from cal1-1 mutant cell
extracts (434), but only 20 mM CaCl2 was added, as opposed to the 100 mM CaCl2 needed to rescue the in
vivo cal1-1 growth defect (435, 437). The
essential targets for S. cerevisiae GGTase I seem
to be Cdc42p and Rho1p, because certain cdc43/cal1 alleles can be suppressed by overexpression of one or both of these
GTPases (434, 439).
Another localization determinant consists of the four Lys residues that are next to the C-terminal prenylated Cys residue. This polylysine region is not found in most Ras-like GTPases, and its positive charges may be interacting with negatively charged components, either protein or phospholipid, at the membrane site to play a role in enhancing membrane association or specific targeting of Cdc42p. A similar polylysine domain is found in the K-Ras protein and is important for membrane localization; altering the Lys residues to Gln results in delocalized K-Ras protein (196, 197). In addition, the analogous polylysine domain in Rac1 was recently shown to be important for interactions with PAK effector kinases (266). Mutating the four Lys residues to Gln in S. cerevisiae Cdc42p, creating the cdc42K183-187Q mutant protein, led to a partial delocalization of the mutant protein (116), suggesting that this domain played a role in targeting or anchoring Cdc42p to the plasma membrane. The K183-187Q mutation could intragenically suppress the dominant lethal cdc42G12V mutant, and expression of the cdc42K183-187Q mutant gene on a plasmid could complement the cdc42-1ts mutant. The ability of the cdc42K183-187Q mutant gene to complement the cdc42-1ts mutant (in contrast to the nonfunctional cdc42C188S mutant gene, which cannot complement the cdc42-1ts mutant [642]), together with the partial delocalization of the mutant protein, suggested that the K183-187Q mutation had an intermediate effect on Cdc42p function and that the polylysine domain of Cdc42p was necessary but not sufficient for complete plasma membrane localization. Another interesting mutation in this domain, the cdc42K186R mutant allele, exhibited a ts loss-of-function phenotype in S. cerevisiae (391) and displayed a morphological phenotype of elongated buds and multiple nuclei suggestive of either a delay at the morphogenesis checkpoint (see "S. cerevisiae" under "Functional studies" below) and/or a cytokinesis defect at permissive temperatures (106a). The nature of this mutation (Lys to Arg) suggested that these phenotypes were not due to a change in charge or conformation of the protein but more probably were due to altered interactions with another protein. However, recent results indicate that this mutant protein has an increased intrinsic GTPase activity (see "GTPase-activating proteins" below), suggesting that improper negative regulation of this mutant protein may be playing a role in its phenotypes. Therefore, the mechanism by which this mutant protein exerts its effects remains to be fully elucidated.
All known Cdc42 proteins contain the C-terminal sequence Cys-Xaa-Xaa-Leu, with the exception of the mouse and human brain G25K isoforms, which end in a Phe residue instead of Leu (Fig. 1). Mammalian Cdc42p posttranslational modifications have been analyzed biochemically with protein purified from bovine brain cells (22, 612, 613), cultured murine erythroleukemia cells (354), rat and human pancreatic islet cells (274), or rat kidney cells (45), not with recombinant protein, and so it is unclear whether these studies were performed on the Cdc42Hs or G25K isoform. Regardless, it is clear that the membrane-bound form of mammalian Cdc42p is geranylgeranylated at the Cys residue, the last three amino acids are proteolytically removed, and the now C-terminal prenylated Cys residue is carboxyl methylated, resulting in a protein with a S-(all-trans-geranylgeranyl) cysteine methyl ester at its C terminus (612). These modifications are necessary for membrane localization, and, as with S. cerevisiae Cdc42p, mammalian Cdc42p fractionates to both particulate and soluble pools (45, 354).
Carboxyl methylation of soluble Cdc42p from bovine brain (22), rat kidney cells (45), or pancreatic islet cells (274) seems to be GTP stimulated, but methylation of the membrane-bound form is not (613), presumably because the membrane-bound form is already GTP bound. The methyltransferase activity from brain extracts (613) and insulin-secreting cells (318) was membrane bound. Recently, a human myeloid prenylcysteine carboxyl methyltransferase with in vitro activity against Cdc42Hs was shown to localize to the endoplasmic reticulum membrane (114); the S. cerevisiae Ste14p prenylcysteine carboxyl methyltransferase is also found in the endoplasmic reticulum membrane (490), but it has not been shown to have in vitro or in vivo activity against Cdc42p. Interestingly, addition of glucose to pancreatic islet cells extracts stimulated the carboxyl methylation of Cdc42p (274), and inhibition of Cdc42p function by Clostridium difficile toxins A or B resulted in reductions in glucose-stimulated insulin secretion (273), suggesting that Cdc42p may play a role in glucose-stimulated insulin secretion.
Using affinity-purified anti-Cdc42 antibodies, Cdc42p from rabbit liver
was shown to associate with a membrane fraction highly enriched in
Golgi membranes (137). In pancreatic islet cells (274) and rat kidney cells (45), Cdc42 was
predominantly cytosolic, but it was translocated to the particulate
pool upon addition of guanosine 5'-(3-O-thio)triphosphate
(GTP
S). In NR-6 fibroblasts and rat kidney cells, Cdc42p
localized to a perinuclear region that coincided with markers for the
Golgi complex including the 110-kDa subunit of the coatomer complex
-COP (137). This localization was rapidly altered to
general cytosolic localization upon addition of brefeldin A (BFA), a
drug which inhibits vesicle formation at the Golgi membrane by
inhibiting the guanine nucleotide exchange activity for the Arf
GTPase, suggesting that Cdc42p may play a role in or be subject to
intracellular membrane trafficking events. BFA-induced delocalization
of Cdc42p was inhibited by AlF4
and by
expression of GTPase-defective Arf, while expression of a
dominant negative Arf mutant resulted in BFA-independent delocalization of Cdc42p. These results suggest that association of Cdc42p with Golgi
membranes is dependent on the guanine nucleotide-bound state of the Arf
GTPase. It should be noted that in these experiments, the NR-6
fibroblasts and rat kidney cells did not exhibit polarized growth
patterns to a region of their cell periphery. In human HeLa cells
transiently transfected with a epitope-tagged Cdc42G12V
protein, the epitope-tagged protein localized to focal complexes and to regions of polarized growth within the
Cdc42G12V-induced peripheral actin microspikes (PAMs) (see
"Mammals" under "Functional studies" below) and colocalized
with actin and PAKs within these PAMs (127, 356). In
addition, HA-tagged Cdc42G12V protein co-localized with the
IQGAP1 downstream effector to cell-cell contact sites of Madin-Darby
canine kidney cells (282).
In Drosophila wing disc epithelial cells, Cdc42p localized in a polarized manner to the basal and apical regions (128). In elongating cells, Cdc42p was restricted to the apical and basal membranes, but in nonelongating cells, it was found on lateral membranes as well. This localization pattern was also seen for the actin cytoskeleton, again providing a mechanistic link between Cdc42 and actin rearrangements. C. elegans Cdc42p was shown to fractionate predominantly to a particulate fraction from mixed-stage populations of C. elegans cells and to localize in a polarized manner to both the circumferential and longitudinal boundaries of hypodermal cells during hypodermal cell fusion in embryo elongation, in a pattern similar to that of the C. elegans PAK homolog (87).
In summary, Cdc42 proteins are membrane bound through their posttranslational modifications and are localized to either internal membranes or the plasma membrane at locations where polarized events are occurring. While prenylation is necessary for membrane anchorage, it is not known if it is sufficient for proper targeting. The mechanism by which Cdc42 proteins are targeted to appropriate membranes in regions of polarized cell growth is unknown, but it is likely to be through protein-protein or protein-lipid interactions at the site.
FUNCTIONAL STUDIES
|
|
|---|
It is clear from the recent explosion of experimental results that Cdc42p functions in a variety of cellular processes in eukaryotic cells. The major functions of Cdc42p seem to be in regulating the rearrangements of the actin cytoskeleton in response to extracellular and intracellular signals as well as in modulating protein kinase cascades that result in the transcriptional activation of genes required for growth control and numerous other cellular processes. Cdc42p also performs other cellular functions, which are independent of actin rearrangements and mitogen-activated protein (MAP) kinase cascades, and so it would be premature to think that the panoply of Cdc42p-dependent processes has been entirely revealed. Although Cdc42p has been implicated in a wide variety of cellular processes, we still have little insight into the mechanisms of action or the conservation of function for Cdc42p within these processes.
Saccharomyces cerevisiae
S. cerevisiae alters its morphology in response to both exogenous and endogenous signals, leading to either bud emergence and enlargement during the mitotic cell cycle, mating-projection ("shmoo") formation through the mating/pheromone response pathway in response to exogenous mating-factor pheromones, pseudohyphal formation and filamentous growth in response to starvation conditions, or spore formation during meiosis. Cdc42p has been implicated in regulating the first three processes but not in sporulation to date. The mechanisms by which Cdc42p regulates the generation of, and switching between, these different morphogenetic patterns is still unclear, but Cdc42p interactions with the actin cytoskeleton play a critical role in this regulation. The functional connection between Cdc42p and the cortical actin cytoskeleton has recently been reinforced by the observation that Cdc42p can stimulate actin polymerization in permeabilized S. cerevisiae cells (324).
Mitotic cell cycle. The morphological changes that occur during the S. cerevisiae mitotic cell cycle can be divided into five sequential phases: (i) selection of a nonrandom bud emergence site and the organization of the protein machinery at that bud site, including rearrangement of the cortical actin cytoskeleton; (ii) bud emergence and polarized growth towards and within the emerging bud; (iii) a switch from apical to isotropic bud growth (the "apical-isotropic switch" [see below]); (iv) cytokinesis, septum formation, and cell separation; and (v) isotropic growth of undersized daughter cells after cell separation prior to the initiation of their next cell cycle (reviewed in references 77, 126, and 465) (Fig. 2). A variety of data suggest that Cdc42p can function at multiple stages of the cell cycle. As mentioned above (see "Cdc42p structure and functional domains"), the initial characterization of S. cerevisiae Cdc42p suggested that it plays a role in the actin-dependent generation of cell polarity during the process of bud emergence. Subsequent analysis of ts, dominant activated, and dominant negative cdc42 alleles substantiated this inference and suggested an additional function in the initial selection of the site of bud emergence. Analysis of the cdc42V44A and cdc42K186R mutant alleles, along with the subcellular localization of Cdc42p to the mother-bud neck region in large-budded cells, raises the possibility that Cdc42 functions either within the apical-isotropic switch at a morphogenesis checkpoint (Fig. 2) (see below) and/or in controlling actin-dependent events that occur during cytokinesis and septum formation. In addition, GTP-bound Cdc42p functions with the mitotic cyclin Clb2p-Cdc28p kinase complex to lead to the mitosis-specific phosphorylation of several substrates (see below). A potential model that is consistent with the proposed roles for Cdc42p throughout the cell cycle is presented in Fig. 3; a detailed discussion of individual protein components of the model can be found under the individual protein subsections in "Cdc42p regulators" and "Cdc42p downstream effectors" below.
|
|
elongation factor, Bud6p, and Spa2p. This complex, along with a number
of other actin-binding proteins (not shown in Fig. 3), nucleates the
localized assembly of the septin, chitin, and Myo1p rings and the
subsequent polymerization of actin at the bud tip, leading to bud
emergence and apical bud growth (Fig. 3B). After bud emergence, Gic2p
is phosphorylated and ubiquitinated in a Cdc42p-GTP-dependent
manner, leading to its degradation (Fig. 3A).
After DNA replication, the apical growth of the bud switches to
isotropic growth. This apical-isotropic switch (316) (step 4) depends on activation of the Clb1p-2p/Cdc28p kinase complex, which,
along with GTP-bound Cdc42p and Nap1p, is needed for the hyperphosphorylation of Cla4p and Gin4p; it is evidenced by bud shape
changes and the distribution of cortical actin and Cdc42p to the sides
of enlarging buds. The action of one or more Cdc42p-GAPs (Bem3p, Rga1p,
and Rga2p) may also be necessary for the apical-isotropic switch,
leading to the conversion of Cdc42p-GTP to a GDP-bound state which
can then be extracted from the plasma membrane by the Rdi1p Rho-GDI
(Fig. 3A, step 5). Since both GFP-Cdc42p and GFP-Cdc24p are localized
to the mother-bud neck region in large-budded cells (508b),
in step 6 Cdc42p can be activated to a GTP-bound state by Cdc24p at
the mother-bud neck region. Activated GTP-bound Cdc42p can interact
again with one or more of the PAK-like kinases, probably Cla4p, whose
kinase activity peaks at G2/M, as well as the IQGAP homolog
Iqg1p/Cyk1p through its GRD domain. The Iqg1p/Cyk1p IQGAP protein is
another scaffold protein that can interact with the Cmd1p
calmodulin protein through its IQ domains as well as with actin through
its calponin homology (CH) domain. The activated PAK-like kinase might
then phosphorylate the Myo1p myosin, which has already formed a
ring structure at the mother-bud neck region, the Myo2 and Myo4
myosins, which bind to calmodulin, the septin proteins that comprise
the 10-nm filament ring present at the mother-bud neck region, or
other as yet undetermined substrates. (Phosphorylation of Myo1p and/or
septin proteins may also occur upon assembly in late G1;
see "Cla4p" under "Cdc42p downstream effectors"). These
interactions lead to the formation of a septin-dependent actomyosin
ring at the mother-bud neck region and the subsequent contraction of
this ring following anaphase, leading to cytokinesis (Fig. 3B). The
localization of cortical actin at the mother-bud neck region, following
the contraction of the actomyosin ring and cytokinesis, is a prelude to
chitin synthase II-dependent septum formation and eventual cell
separation (Fig. 3B).
The means by which cell cycle control is imposed on these morphogenetic
events is starting to come into focus (for reviews, see references
41, 316, and 381). The timing of
these events is coordinated with the cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK)
Cdc28p and the START step of the cell cycle. Formation of the cortical
actin patches and formation of the septin, Myo1p, and chitin rings
occur around the same time in late G1 following the
activation of the G1 cyclins Cln1p-3p-Cdc28p kinase
complexes that are necessary for START (Fig. 3B). Bud emergence and
apical bud growth occur ~15 min later. The Cln2p-Cdc28p complex also
phosphorylates the Ste20p PAK-like kinase at this stage of the cell
cycle, and although this phosphorylation occurs at the time when Ste20p
is localized to the emerging bud tips, it does not seem to affect the
Ste20p kinase activity (see "Ste20p" below). There also exists a
morphogenesis checkpoint that monitors proper actin cytoskeletal
structures after bud emergence (313-315, 381, 526). The
lack of proper actin structures triggers this morphogenesis checkpoint,
causing the Swe1p inhibitory phosphorylation of the mitotic cyclin
Clb1p-2p/Cdc28p complexes at the Y19 residue of Cdc28p, leading to
G2/M and nuclear division delays. The morphological
phenotypes associated with the cdc42V44A
effector domain mutant suggest that Cdc42p or Cdc42p-dependent events
may also be involved in this checkpoint (475a). Activation of the Clb1p-2p/Cdc28p kinase complex is necessary for the
apical-isotropic switch, possibly through the Cdc42p- and
septin-dependent phosphorylation of Gin4p and Cla4p (Fig. 3A), and for
the promotion of anaphase and nuclear division, while destruction of
the mitotic cyclins Clb1p through Clb4p is necessary for cytokinesis
and redistribution of cortical actin to the site of septation. While
many of the aspects of this proposed cell cycle and morphogenesis model
are consistent with published findings (see the sections on individual proteins below), several aspects remain to be experimentally tested. Most notably, the functional consequences of interactions between Cdc42p and Gic1p, Gic2p, and the three PAK-like kinases remain to be
fully elucidated and the potential cell cycle-dependent role of the
Bni1p, Bnr1p, and Iqg1p/Cyk1p scaffold proteins in brokering
Cdc42p-actin interactions is unclear. In addition, the substrates for
the Cln1p-3p/Cdc28p and Clb1p-4p/Cdc28p CDK complexes that are
necessary for these cell cycle-dependent morphogenetic switches remain
to be determined.
Mating pathway. The S. cerevisiae mating pathway is a classic signal transduction pathway in which an extracellular signal (peptide pheromone) binds to a G-protein coupled transmembrane receptor, thereby activating a MAP kinase cascade that ultimately leads to a number of cellular events, including the transcriptional induction of genes necessary for the mating process, a G1 arrest as a prelude to cell-cell fusion and karyogamy, and the generation of unique morphological structures (mating projections or shmoos) that are the sites of contact for cell-cell fusion and mating (for reviews, see references 26, 297, 350, and 368) (Fig. 4A). The notion that Cdc42p plays a role in the S. cerevisiae mating pathway came from the analysis of cdc42 mutants, the subcellular localization of Cdc42p, and its interactions with the Ste20p protein kinase. The mating efficiencies of loss-of-function cdc42 mutants were reduced, and signaling through the pheromone response pathway was diminished (527, 626), while expression of the dominant activated cdc42G12V mutant allele led to a modest (two- to threefold) increase in signaling as assayed by FUS1-lacZ expression (9), suggesting that Cdc42p plays a role in the activation of the pheromone response MAP kinase cascade (see below). In addition, Cdc42p localized to the tips of mating projections in pheromone-arrested cells (643), suggesting that it plays a direct role in pheromone-induced morphological changes.
|
Pseudohyphal and invasive growth. S. cerevisiae cells can alter their morphogenetic patterns in response to starvation conditions, leading to filamentous growth and the generation of pseudohyphae (for reviews, see references 26, 167, 297, 349, and 350). Diploid cells respond to nitrogen starvation by altering their cell cycles, budding patterns, cell shape, and cell separation patterns, resulting in polarized elongated budded cells that resemble fungal hyphae (168, 280). Haploid cells can also be induced to filamentous growth, which is manifested as invasive growth into agar plates (43, 487). A detailed mutational analysis of actin mutants indicated that the actin cytoskeleton plays a critical role in various aspects of pseudohyphal growth (63). The primary signaling route leading to pseudohyphal growth involves the Ras2 GTPase signaling through Cdc42p to several components of the pheromone response MAP kinase cascade, including Ste20p, Ste11p, Ste7p, and Kss1p, thereby activating the Ste12p transcription factor which, together with the Tec1 transcription factor, induces the expression of genes necessary for filamentous growth (Fig. 4A) (168, 330, 348, 351, 405, 487, 488).
The role of Cdc42p in this signaling pathway was deduced by the observations that expression of the dominant negative Cdc42D118A mutant protein inhibited Ras2-dependent filamentous growth and that expression of the activated Cdc42G12V mutant protein induced filamentous growth and transcription from a FG(TyA)::lacZ reporter construct that specifically responds to filamentous growth signals (405). As opposed to effects in the pheromone response pathway (see above), mutations within the Ste20 CRIB domains inhibited filamentous growth (298, 456), indicating that Cdc42p-Ste20p interactions are necessary for this morphological switch. Interestingly, the yeast 14-3-3 proteins Bmh1p and Bmh2p (165, 573) are also necessary for this signaling pathway and interact with Ste20p in vivo (488), although it is not known whether this interaction is mediated through phosphoserine residues in Ste20p as are other 14-3-3 interactions (610). It is interesting that Cln1p-2p/Cdc28p phosphorylation of Ste20p (see "Mitotic cell cycle" above) may also play a role in pseudohyphal and invasive growth in that cells lacking Cln1p and Cln2p fail to undergo pseudohyphal or invasive growth (431). Therefore, in response to nutritional signals, Cdc42p plays a role in activating a MAP kinase cascade that positively regulates the transcriptional induction of key morphogenetic and growth genes. This Cdc42p function is similar to that seen in mammalian cells with the induction of the JNK and p38 MAP kinase cascades leading to c-Jun transcriptional activity (see "Mammals" below).Schizosaccharomyces pombe
In the rod-shaped fission yeast S. pombe, there are three switches in polarized cell growth patterns during the cell cycle (Fig. 2). First, selective and polar growth is initiated at the beginning of the cell cycle at the "old end" of the cell, which is the end distal to the previous division site (reviewed in reference 425). This growth occurs at the end of the cylindrical cell and can be monitored by staining with the dye Calcofluor and by the presence of cortical actin dots (366, 376). Second, after ~0.3 of the cell cycle, a switch in polarized growth, referred to as new-end takeoff, occurs from unidirectional at the old end to bidirectional at both ends (Fig. 2). This growth pattern is visualized by the appearance of both Calcofluor staining and cortical actin dots at the new end and depends on the cell attaining a minimal length and completing the S phase. Third, bipolar growth continues until ~0.75 of the cell cycle, at which time cortical actin reorganizes to the site of septum formation and end growth ceases, resulting in a constant-length stage of the cell cycle. Following cytokinesis and cell separation, polarity must be re-established at the old end as a prelude to unipolar growth in the next cell cycle.
The S. pombe Cdc42p homolog (cdc42+) was isolated from an S. pombe cDNA library by functional complementation of the S. cerevisiae cdc42-1ts mutation (390). The predicted amino acid sequence of S. pombe Cdc42p is 85% identical to those of both S. cerevisiae and human Cdc42p (Fig. 1). Disruption of cdc42+ showed that the gene was essential for growth. The S. pombe cdc42 loss-of-function phenotype was originally determined by generating a null allele in a haploid strain that was complemented by the wild-type allele on a plasmid and then inducing plasmid loss to uncover the loss-of-function phenotype (390). The morphological phenotype consisted of small, round, dense, uninucleate cells, which is strikingly different from that associated with cdc42 loss-of-function alleles in S. cerevisiae (2, 642) (see above). The S. pombe cdc42 null phenotype suggested that macromolecular synthesis continued but incorporation of new cellular material into an enlarging cell was inhibited, hence the small, dense, dead cells. Similar morphologies, as well as reduced mating efficiencies, were observed with the cdc42T17N dominant negative allele (447), suggesting that Cdc42p functions within the mating pathway as well (see below). The uninucleate, 1C phenotype, as assayed by DAPI staining and fluorescence-activated cell sorter analysis, indicated that the mitotic cell cycle was blocked in G1 phase, which is also different from the S. cerevisiae arrest phenotype of multinucleate cells. It is likely that the cell cycle coordination between DNA synthesis and Cdc42 function is more tightly regulated in S. pombe. Taken together, these data are consistent with Cdc42p functioning in the targeting and incorporation of new growth at the old end in G1 phase, possibly by affecting protein secretion or secretory-vesicle fusion to the plasma membrane.
Recent data indicating that S. pombe Cdc42p localizes to the septum region (381a) raises the possibility that Cdc42p plays a direct role in septum formation. In S. pombe, cytokinesis begins in early M phase with the assembly of the actin-based medial ring followed by septum formation and cell separation (reviewed in reference 176). Given that GFP-Cdc42p in S. pombe localizes to the medial area in a ring-like structure in some cells that do not have a visible septum, Cdc42p may play a role in the early steps of medial ring formation prior to septum formation. Interestingly, S. pombe Cdc12p, a homolog of the S. cerevisiae Cdc42-interacting protein Bni1p (139, 232) (see "Cdc42p downstream effectors" below), has also been implicated in medial ring formation (74).
To date, two potential downstream effectors of Cdc42p has been characterized in S. pombe, the Pak1p/Shk1p (364, 447) and Pak2p/Shk2p (515, 616) protein kinases (see "PAK-like kinases" below). Pak1p/Shk1p is a CRIB domain-containing ~72-kDa serine/threonine protein kinase that belongs to the PAK family of Cdc42-interacting protein kinases. It can autophosphorylate on Ser and Thr residues and binds preferentially to Cdc42p-GTP. The physiological significance of these interactions was supported by the morphological abnormalities associated with the overexpression or absence of Pak1p and the synthetic-overdose phenotypes observed when overexpressing activated or dominant negative cdc42 alleles together with wild-type or kinase-defective pak1 mutants. Deletion of pak1 is lethal, resulting in small, round cells, a morphology reminiscent of cdc42 null mutants. This result indicates that Pak1p provides an essential function in the cell polarity pathway, which is different from its S. cerevisiae homologs Ste20p, Cla4p, and Skm1p. Pak1p and Cdc42p were also required for mating in S. pombe (see "PAK-like kinases" below). Taken together, the data are consistent with Pak1p being a downstream effector of Cdc42p in the cell polarity and mating pathways (Fig. 4B). Pak2p/Shk2p is a nonessential protein with the greatest similarity in predicted amino acid sequence to S. cerevisiae Cla4p and Skm1p (515). Its role as a downstream effector of Cdc42p is unclear (see "PAK-like kinases" below).
Candida albicans
The Candida albicans CDC42 gene was identified by degenerate oligonucleotide PCR and isolated from a C. albicans genomic library by DNA-DNA hybridization to the PCR probe (394). C. albicans Cdc42p is 87.8% identical to S. cerevisiae Cdc42p throughout the entire coding region (Fig. 1A), and DNA-DNA hybridizations suggested that CDC42 is single copy. Analysis of mRNA levels indicated that there is a transient increase in Cdc42p expression in the dimorphic switch to bud emergence, suggesting that C. albicans Cdc42p plays a role in this process. C. albicans homologs of the S. cerevisiae cell polarity proteins Rsr1p/Bud1p (608), Rho1p (272), Cla4p (299), Ste20p and Ste7 (268, 296), Fus3p/Kss1p (110, 595), and Ste12p (329, 352) have also been identified, and many of them have been implicated in hyphal formation and candidiasis. It remains to be seen if Cdc42p also functions in pseudohyphal formation in C. albicans, as it does in S. cerevisiae.
Caenorhabditis elegans
The Caenorhabditis elegans Cdc42 gene seems to be more highly expressed in embryonic cells than in larvae or adults, and when expressed in S. cerevisiae, it could complement the cdc42-1ts allele (88), indicating that it is a functional homolog. The C. elegans Cdc42 protein, expressed as a glutathione S-transferase (GST) fusion, could bind and hydrolyze GTP at rates comparable to the human Cdc42 protein (88). By using anti-Cdc42 antibodies, Cdc42p was shown to fractionate predominantly to a particulate fraction from mixed-stage populations of C. elegans cells and to localize to both the circumferential and longitudinal boundaries of hypodermal cells during hypodermal cell fusion in embryo elongation, in a pattern similar to that of the C. elegans PAK homolog (87). These results suggest that C. elegans Cdc42 plays a role in the actin-dependent process of embryonic-body elongation. Analysis of cdc42 activated or dominant negative mutant alleles in C. elegans has not been reported to date. The unc-73 gene product exhibits structural homologies to the Dbl family of GEFs (see "Mammalian GEFs" below) and has guanine nucleotide exchange activity against Ce-Rac but not Ce-Cdc42 in vitro (536); whether it is a GEF for Cdc42p in vivo is unknown. Unc-73p localized to the nerve ring and ventral nerve cord and was required for neuronal axon guidance; upon injection into cells, it induced actin polymerization at the plasma membrane. Recently, a C. elegans homolog of the mammalian MKK7 protein kinase, which functions in the Cdc42p-JNK MAP kinase signaling cascade (see "Mammals" below), was identified (148). Characterization of this and other components of the JNK signaling cascade should provide valuable insight into Cdc42p functions in C. elegans.
Drosophila
Studies with Drosophila have indicated a role for Cdc42p in a variety of actin-dependent processes (128, 129, 336, 408). These studies have been based on the analysis of the cellular phenotypes associated with overexpression of activated and dominant negative cdc42 alleles. For example, expression of the activated cdc42G12V mutant allele in the nervous system resulted in defects in dendrite and axon outgrowth and in embryo death whereas expression in muscle led to abnormally shaped muscle fibers (336). Expression of the cdc42G12V mutant allele in epithelial cells of the wing imaginal disc led to a high rate of cell death, but expression of a cdc42 dominant negative allele led to changes in the shape of polarized cells, a disruption of apico-basal cell elongation, and a loss of the dense, actin-containing plaques seen on the basal membrane. There were also mild effects on the location of the adherens junctions at the apical face of the cells (128). Expression of the dominant negative cdc42 allele did not affect polarized-protein accumulation in epithelial cells, as evidenced by proper cadherin and yellow-protein localization. In wing epithelial cells that form hairs, expression of the dominant negative cdc42 allele led to a loss or stunting of wing hair formation, which appeared to be a consequence of defects in actin polymerization within the wing hair (128, 129). In ovaries, expression of the activated cdc42G12V allele led to defects in actin distribution, resulting in altered nurse cell structure (i.e., abnormally fused nurse cells) and delocalized ring canals, structures which function as a cytoplasmic conduit between nurse cells and the oocyte but did not affect border cell migration (408). Therefore, Cdc42p seems to regulate actin distribution and function in a number of different cellular processes. In addition, Cdc42p may be involved with various Drosophila MAP kinase and JNK homologs (195, 482, 530) (see below) that regulate a variety of cellular processes including dorsal closure and establishment of cell polarity (for a review, see reference 233).
Mammals
Mammalian Cdc42p has been implicated in a wide variety of in vivo functions including receptor-mediated signal transduction pathways leading to induction of transcription and actin rearrangements, cell cycle progression, and apoptosis. Most of these studies have relied on the phenotypic analysis of ectopic expression of dominant activated and dominant negative cdc42 mutants. In addition, the characterization of mammalian Cdc42p-interacting proteins has implicated Cdc42p in multiple pathways (Fig. 4C), whose regulation is still unclear.
Actin rearrangements. One of the earliest studies showed that differentiation of human monocytes into macrophages following the addition of phorbol esters led to an increase in the amount of membrane-bound Cdc42p that correlated with an increase in the actin-dependent cell-spreading activity (6). In subsequent studies, microinjection of wild-type or activated Cdc42G12V protein into serum-starved or subconfluent Swiss 3T3 fibroblasts led to the induction of peripheral actin PAMs, actin-containing long peripheral filopodia, and vinculin-containing focal complexes and to a reduction in the number of Rho-dependent actin stress fibers (277, 420). Filopodia are thought to be sensory structures involved in the actin-based polarized cell growth observed in fibroblasts (11) and neuronal cells (229, 254, 531). The Cdc42p-dependent induction of vinculin-containing focal complexes in serum-starved Swiss 3T3 fibroblasts was inhibited by microinjection of the dominant negative RacT17N protein, and the induction of filopodia was seen as a prelude to the formation of Rac-dependent membrane ruffles and lamellipodia and Rho-dependent stress fibers in time-lapse photomicroscopy (277, 420, 476, 479, 480). These results suggest that Cdc42p may function upstream of Rac and Rho in the generation of actin-dependent subcellular structures in these cells (420).
PAM induction was a rapid response that occurred within 5 min after injection and was mimicked by the addition of the mitogenic peptide bradykinin but not by phorbol esters or growth factors, such as lysophosphatidic acid and bombesin, that induced Rho-dependent stress fibers (476) or by platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF), EGF, or insulin, which induced Rac-dependent membrane ruffling (480). Both Cdc42p- and bradykinin-dependent inductions were inhibited by coinjection of either the dominant negative Cdc42T17N protein or the Rho-GDI protein (277), suggesting that the bradykinin effects were mediated by Cdc42p. Induction of PAMs and loss of stress fibers was also observed when the activated Cdc42G12V allele was stably expressed from a tetracycline-repressible promoter in human HtTa-1 cells (127), and this led to an enrichment for actin and the actin-bundling protein plastin, as well as the proline-rich focal adhesion protein VASP and the phosphatidylinositol (PI) 3-kinase p85 regulatory subunit, in the PAMs (127). Additionally, expression of Cdc42G12V in these cells resulted in large multinucleate cells, suggesting a defect in cytokinesis. Expression of Cdc42G12V in the highly motile Bac1 murine macrophage cell line also led to the induction of filopodia, a phenotype that was mimicked by the addition of colony-stimulating factor type 1 (CSF-1) and inhibited by injection of the dominant-negative Cdc42T17N protein (12), suggesting that Cdc42p may mediate CSF-1 actions in this cell type. Recent studies have shown that Cdc42p plays a role in Bac1 cell chemotaxis and response to CSF-1 gradients whereas Rho and Rac are required for cell migration (13). Cdc42p and Rac have also been implicated in the PI 3-kinase-dependent actin rearrangements leading to adenovirus endocytosis (317). Cdc42p also seems to mediate the actin rearrangements resulting from cell-cell and cell-substratum adhesion. Stably transformed rat basophil leukemia (RBL-2H3) mast cells expressing the dominant negative myc-tagged Cdc42T17N protein exhibited defects in actin cytoskeletal rearrangements, including cell-substratum adhesion, antigen-induced actin plaque assembly, and vinculin localization, along with a 40% inhibition of high-affinity IgE receptor (Fc
RI)-mediated serotonin release and
degranulation (183). Comicroinjection of the activated
Cdc42G12V allele in Madin-Darby canine kidney cells
reversed the cell-cell and cell-substratum adhesion defects observed
upon microinjection of the Rho-GDI protein (282), suggesting
that Cdc42p plays a role in cell-cell contact, as was also suggested by
functional studies with Drosophila (see above). It is likely
that the effects of Cdc42p on cell-cell adhesion are mediated through
interactions with IQGAP1 (see "IQGAPs as scaffold proteins mediating
Cdc42p-actin interactions" below), in that IQGAP1 colocalized with
E-cadherin and
-catenin at cell-cell adhesion sites and interacted
with both proteins (284). Cdc42p was shown to mediate
integrin-dependent adhesion, membrane ruffling, and cell spreading in
Rat1 and NIH 3T3 fibroblasts (101, 463), and recently it was
shown that disassembly of the fibronectin matrix in human umbilical
vein endothelial cells and KD fibroblasts led to the generation of
Cdc42p-dependent filopodia and the activation of the Cdc42p
downstream effector kinases ACK and p38 (49). In addition,
stable expression of Cdc42G12V in murine 2B4 T cells led to
a loss of microtubule-organizing center polarization toward
antigen-presenting B cells and to a disruption of actin polarization at
the junction between the T cells and B cells (541), a region
to which Cdc42p also localized (reference 249 and
data not shown), suggesting that Cdc42p plays a role in T-cell-B-cell
recognition and interaction.
One of the original Cdc42 cDNAs (G25K) was isolated from bovine brain
(407), and recently Cdc42/G25K was shown to be expressed in
a variety of neuronal tissues within the adult rat brain, including the
neocortex, thalamus, cerebellum, and hippocampus (440, 559). Microinjection of wild-type or activated Cdc42G12V into
N1E-115 neuroblastoma cells led to the induction of filopodium formation, which was not seen upon microinjection of the dominant negative Cdc42T17N protein (278). Microinjection
of the dominant negative Cdc42T17N protein also inhibited
neurite outgrowth in these cells and inhibited the
acetylcholine-dependent formation of filopodia. Expression of the
activated Cdc42Q61L protein in E18/19 cultured cortical rat
neuronal cells led to a slight increase in dendrite formation from
pyramidal and nonpyramidal neurons, while expression of the dominant
negative Cdc42T17N protein resulted in a slight reduction
of dendrites and a reduction in cells that underwent the
pyramidal-to-nonpyramidal morphological remodelling typically
seen during differentiation (559). Also, expression of
dominant negative Cdc42T17N led to a reduction of nerve
growth factor (NGF)-induced neurite formation in PC12 cells
(115). These data suggest that, as with Drosophila Cdc42p, mammalian Cdc42p functions in dendrite
and axon outgrowth during neuronal development, probably through
rearrangements of the actin cytoskeleton (for reviews, see references
337 and 345).
It is clear from these data that Cdc42p plays an intimate role in
controlling actin rearrangements in a number of mammalian cell types.
Cdc42p has been shown to induce membrane-dependent actin polymerization
in Xenopus extracts (340, 402), in cell extracts
of polymorphonuclear leukocytes and Dictyostelium discoideum amoebae (639), in permeabilized S. cerevisiae
cells (324), and in neutrophil cell extracts
(640), reinforcing the functional connections between Cdc42p
and actin rearrangements. However, the intermediary proteins
linking Cdc42p and the actin cytoskeleton have yet to be determined.
Obvious candidates are the IQGAPs, which can bind both actin and
GTP-Cdc42p (see "IQGAPs as scaffold proteins mediating
Cdc42p-actin interactions" below), and the PAKs (see "PAK-like
kinases" below). For example, expression of a autoinhibitory PAK1
peptide containing amino acids 83 to 149 led to an inhibition of PAK
function and a loss of Cdc42-induced PAMs (627).
Another potential Cdc42p effector in the actin pathway is PI
3-kinase and phosphoinositides (for reviews, see references
154 and 372). The p85 subunit of
PI 3-kinase from NIH 3T3 and PC12 cell lysates was able to bind to
GST-Cdc42Hs-GTP
S as well as to an activated
GST-Cdc42Q61L protein but not to the Cdc42T35A
effector domain mutant protein (628). These
interactions were inhibited by incubation with either the Rho-GAP
homology domain of p85 or the Cdc42GAP/p50rhoGAP protein (see
"Mammalian GAP" below), suggesting that binding was through
interactions between the GAP homology domain and the effector domain.
Binding of Cdc42-GTP
S to p85 led to a two- to fourfold
increase in PI 3-kinase activity from PC12 cell extracts
(628), as well as from rat liver cytosol and COS7 cell
lysates (561). This activation was inhibited by a
p85-specific peptide antigen and by the PI 3-kinase specific inhibitor
wortmannin (561), suggesting that Cdc42p specifically interacts with and activates PI 3-kinase in these cells.
Cdc42-induced actin rearrangements and morphological changes observed
in T47D mammary epithelial cells were inhibited by the PI 3-kinase
inhibitors wortmannin and LY294002, and transfection of these
cells with a constitutively activated p110 catalytic subunit of PI
3-kinase led to the same morphological changes and actin rearrangements as activated Cdc42p (256). Cdc42 also displays interactions
with PI 4,5-bisphosphate [PI(4,5)P2].
PI(4,5)P2 can bind to pleckstrin homology (PH) domains
found in all Cdc42 GEFs (201) (see "Guanine nucleotide
exchange factors" below) and can also enhance nucleotide exchange on
Cdc42Hs by stimulating GDP release and stabilizing the
nucleotide-depleted state in much the same manner as GEFs (632). This effect was specific for PI(4,5)P2,
and deletion of the last 7 amino acids of Cdc42Hs, including the
prenylation site (Fig. 1), led to a loss of PI(4,5)P2
stimulation without affecting Dbl GEF activity. These data
suggested that the PI(4,5)P2 effects were due to
specific nucleotide exchange and not to a nonspecific denaturation of
the protein due to the high levels of phosphoinositide in the reaction
micelles, although this point is in contention (70, 72,
250). PI(4,5)P2 in combination with Cdc42p can also induce actin polymerization in Xenopus extracts
(340) and in cell extracts of polymorphonuclear leukocytes
and D. discoideum amoebae (639). The role of
phosphoinositides in Cdc42p-dependent actin polymerization is
speculated to be through either stimulation of guanine nucleotide
exchange on Cdc42p or an enhancement of membrane attachment
and/or targeting of Cdc42p by disrupting the interactions between
Cdc42p and its GDI (94, 340, 639). PI(4,5)P2 also acts directly on the actin cytoskeleton to promote actin assembly
through the PI(4,5)P2-dependent dissociation of profilin from actin monomers, inhibition of actin-capping proteins, and inhibition of the actin-severing activities of gelsolin and other actin-severing proteins, thereby leading to an increase in the number
of free actin ends available for polymerization (372, 511).
Taken together, these data suggest that PI 3-kinase and phosphoinositides play an important physiological role in mediating Cdc42p-dependent actin rearrangements.
Another potential Cdc42 effector in regulating actin
rearrangements is the myotonic dystrophy kinase-related
Cdc42-binding kinase (MRCK). Coexpression of MRCK
with
activated Cdc42G12V resulted in an induction of
PAMs, and expression of dominant negative, kinase-defective
MRCK
inhibited the effects of Cdc42G12V
(311). Another interesting candidate is the myr5 rat
unconventional myosin. This protein is capable of binding actin and
contains a C-terminal domain, with sequence similarity to Rho-GAP
proteins, that is functional as a GAP against Cdc42p in vitro
(474). However, recent in vivo and in vitro studies suggest
that myr5 may be a specific RhoA-GAP (406). Finally,
the CIP4 protein, which was isolated through a two-hybrid
interaction with activated Cdc42Q61L and contains domains
with similarity to the non-receptor tyrosine kinase FER and to
RhoGAP, bound to Cdc42p in vitro and localized to PAMs and
membrane ruffles along with Cdc42p (18). Determination of
the exact nature of the connections between the Cdc42p signaling module
and actin rearrangements should be vigorously pursued in the near future.
Cdc42p and the JNK/SAPK and p38 MAP kinase cascades.
In addition to regulating actin rearrangements, Cdc42p
functions to couple cell surface receptors to MAP kinases,
thereby transducing extracellular signals to regulate intracellular
events, most notably the transcriptional induction of genes
essential for a diverse number of cellular processes. These
processes include inflammatory and stress responses, mitogenesis,
differentiation, cell growth, cell cycle progression, apoptosis,
prostaglandin biosynthesis, myocyte hypertrophy, and immunity gene
expression (103, 120, 141, 179, 195, 217, 253, 287, 369, 415, 489, 513, 514, 578). The stress response signaling pathway involves the stress-activated protein kinases (SAPKs) (286), which
also can phosphorylate Ser63 and Ser73 in the N terminus of the c-Jun subunit of the AP-1 transcription factor (JNKs) (121). These JNK/SAPK protein kinases can be activated by a variety of cell surface
receptors and cellular stresses such as heat shock, UV radiation, and
changes in osmolarity, by the protein synthesis inhibitors anisomycin
and cycloheximide, and by the cytokines interleukin-1 (IL-1) and tumor
necrosis factor alpha (TNF-
) (121, 286) and can be
inhibited by high cell density (289). The p38/Mpk2 protein
kinase, which is another member of this SAPK family and is the
mammalian homolog of the S. cerevisiae Hog1p (for
"high-osmolarity glycerol") protein kinase, also regulates the ATF2
and Elk-1 transcriptional activators (150, 194, 300, 493).
, but not by anisomycin or
Cdc42Q61L. Recently, a C-terminal domain of the polycystic
kidney disease I (PKD1) gene, which plays a role in autosomal dominant
polycystic kidney disease, was shown to induce c-Jun/AP-1
transcriptional activation through the activation of JNK activity, and
this induction was inhibited by coexpression of dominant negative
Cdc42T17N or RacT17N (17).
Expression of dominant negative Cdc42T17N, as well as
dominant negative RasT17N, dominant negative
Rac1T17N, and dominant negative JNK mutant alleles, in
primary cultures of rat hepatocytes inhibited the
hyperosmotic-glucose-, TNF-
-, and hepatocyte growth factor-induced
stimulation of JNK1 kinase activity, phosphorylation of c-Jun, and
up-regulation of DNA synthesis (20). Transient expression of
wild-type or activated Cdc42Q61L, as well as wild-type or
activated RhoA or Rac, in simian COS7 cells and human T-cell lymphoma
Jurkat cells led to a four- to sevenfold induction of NF-
B-dependent
transcription from a human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-luciferase
reporter construct (455). This induction was inhibited by
coexpression of the I
B
inhibitory subunit, and TNF-
induction of NF-
B-dependent transcription was inhibited by
expression of the dominant negative Cdc42T17N protein.
Recently, analysis of dominant negative Cdc42T17N protein
expression in Rat-2 fibroblasts indicated that Cdc42p mediated the
JNK-dependent transformation of these cells by the Fps and Fes
nonreceptor tyrosine kinases (320), and studies with
T3-1
pituitary cells indicated that the Cdc42p-JNK pathway mediated gonadotropin-releasing hormone activity (312). The
above-mentioned results are consistent with a model in which Cdc42p
acts to stimulate JNK/SAPK and p38 kinase activities, leading
to translocation of these kinases to the nucleus, where they
phosphorylate a number of different transcriptional activators and
induce the expression of genes needed for stress responses,
mitogenesis, and cell growth.
There are several likely intermediates in the signaling cascades
linking Cdc42p to the JNK/SAPK and p38 MAP kinase, including the PAK
family of Cdc42p-interacting kinases (see "PAK-like kinases" below), as well as other downstream MAP kinase kinases and MAP kinase
kinase kinases (for reviews, see references 141 and
233). Overexpression of the wild-type PAK1 protein
kinase stimulated p38 in vitro kinase activity, and overexpression of a
dominant negative PAK1K299R mutant protein, as well as the
dominant negative Cdc42T17N mutant protein, inhibited the
IL-1-dependent induction of p38 activity in HeLa cells
(625). Expression of the mPAK-3F91S, G93A, P95A
(23) or hPAK1L107F (55)
constitutively activated alleles in COS cells led to a modest
(mPAK-3F91S, G93A, P95A) to substantial
(hPAK1L107F) induction of JNK in vitro protein kinase
activity. Transfection of wild-type PAK into 293 human kidney
fibroblasts led to induction of the JNK/SAPK and p38 in vitro kinase
activities (153), and transfection of activated
Cdc42Q61L also led to an induction of the JNK/SAPK
kinase activity, which was abrogated in cells cotransfected with a PAK
CRIB domain-containing fragment (556). Expression of
another CRIB-containing protein kinase, MLK3, whose CRIB domain
can interact with Cdc42p in vitro (59), effectively induced
JNK activity and enhanced the Cdc42Q61L-dependent induction
(555). Of the three known MLKs, MLK2 and MLK3 interact with
Cdc42p-GTP and activate the JNK pathway (411). MLK3 and
PAK1 coimmunoprecipitated in the presence of activated Cdc42Q61L, and expression of Cdc42Q61L led to
an increase in the in vitro MLK3 and PAK1 activity against myelin basic
protein. Expression of the dominant negative MLK3K144R
mutant allele led to a reduction of the Cdc42Q61L-dependent
JNK activation, and expression of a dominant negative SEK mutant allele
(see below) reduced MLK3 induction. This complex set of results suggest
that Cdc42 can interact with multiple MAP kinase kinase kinases
depending on the cell type and that these kinases can also transduce
Cdc42p-independent signals to downstream effectors.
The MEKKs (MAP/ERK kinase kinases) function downstream of Cdc42
to regulate the JNK pathway but not the p38 pathway (142, 286, 393, 614). Of the four MEKK proteins (MEKK1 to MEKK4) characterized from COS cells (142), only MEKK4 contains a
potential Cdc42p-interacting CRIB domain. However, expression of both
MEKK4 and MEKK1 dominant negative kinase-defective mutant proteins, but
not MEKK2 or MEKK3, could inhibit Cdc42Q61L-dependent
induction of JNK kinase activity. Both MEKK4 and MEKK1 could interact
with Cdc42 in in vitro binding assays, although MEKK1 preferentially
interacted with GTP-bound Cdc42p whereas MEKK4 could bind to both
GDP- and GTP-bound Cdc42p (142). Interestingly, MEKK4 localized to the Golgi in a similar manner to Cdc42p in COS cells
(137, 142). Expression of dominant negative
kinase-defective MEKK4 and MEKK1 did not affect the PAK-dependent
induction of JNK activity in COS cells (142), suggesting
that PAKs and MEKKs can function in independent Cdc42-dependent
signaling pathways to JNK activation.
The two primary activators of JNK that function downstream of the MEKKs
are the MKK4/SEK1 and MKK7 kinases (for a review, see reference
233). MKK7 specifically activates JNK and has
homologs in Drosophila (hemipterous), which
functions upstream of Drosophila DJNK, and C. elegans (cMKK7), while MKK4/SEK1 can activate both JNK
and p38 in vitro. MKK4/SEK1 knockout mice display a specific defect in
stress-induced JNK activation and AP-1 transcriptional activation
(417, 615), providing elegant in vivo data supporting the
role of the JNK signaling pathway in stress-induced AP-1 transcription activation. Taken together, these data suggest that Cdc42p can signal
through either PAKs, MLKs, or MEKKs to the MKKs that induce JNK
activity and transcriptional activation. Recently, a potential scaffolding protein, JIP-1, was shown to bind to MLKs, MKK7,
and JNK but not Cdc42, thereby linking these kinase-signaling
components (597). Determination of the mechanisms by which
Cdc42p signals to this multitude of protein kinases in vivo should be
an area of intensive investigation in the near future.
In addition to functioning within the JNK/SAPK and p38 MAP kinase
signaling cascades, Cdc42p has been implicated in the activation of the
Ras-dependent ERK MAP kinase pathway. This involvement is consistent
with the role of Cdc42p (see below) and Rac (258) in
Ras-dependent transformation of NIH 3T3 cells. Expression of wild-type
or activated Cdc42G12V alone in 293 kidney cells did not
activate ERK2 in vitro kinase activity, but coexpression with wild-type
Raf-1 (152) or a constitutively activated Raf BXB mutant
(153) resulted in an 11- to 16-fold synergistic stimulation.
In addition, expression of the PAK1 CRIB domain inhibited the
H-RasG12V stimulation of ERK2 activity. Coexpression of
Cdc42Q61L and wild-type Raf-1 also resulted in a
synergistic stimulation of Elk1-dependent transcriptional activation in
NIH 3T3 cells (152) (Elk1 is a member of the ternary complex
factor family of ERK-dependent transcription factors that regulate the
c-fos serum response element), providing a physiological
correlation between Cdc42p-dependent ERK2 stimulation and ternary
complex factor-dependent transcriptional activation. Similar
results were seen with ectopic expression of activated
Cdc42G12V in NIH 3T3 cells (220) and this
activation was not dependent on activation of the JNK/SAPK pathway.
This cross talk between the ERK and JNK/SAPK pathways seems to occur
through interactions of PAK with the MEK1 MAP kinase kinase because
coexpression of wild-type or constitutively activated PAK1 with Raf-1
led to a synergistic stimulation of MEK1 and ERK2 activity and
Elk-dependent transcription and because PAK1 could phosphorylate the
functionally important MEK1-Ser298 residue in vitro and in NIH 3T3
cells (152). The physiological ramifications of this
potential cross talk remain to be determined.
Ras-mediated transformation, cell cycle progression, and apoptosis. Cdc42p has been implicated in mitogenesis and cell cycle progression, but there are conflicting data concerning its exact role in these processes. Microinjection of activated Cdc42G12V protein into quiescent Swiss 3T3 fibroblasts led to an increase in the bromodeoxyuridine incorporation into DNA, and expression of dominant negative Cdc42T17N blocked serum-induced bromodeoxyuridine incorporation (442), suggesting that Cdc42p is necessary for cell cycle progression in these cells. In contrast, microinjection of wild-type Cdc42p into G1-synchronized NIH 3T3 cells resulted in a dramatic cell cycle arrest at G1/S, whereas microinjection of activated and dominant negative Cdc42 alleles had a similar but less drastic effect (400). Interestingly, this effect was mediated through the p38 MAP kinase pathway but not the JNK/SAPK pathway. Expression of activated Cdc42G12V in Rat1 and NIH 3T3 cells did not seem to lead to increases in low-serum growth or growth to high saturation density (466, 494), which is also in contrast to the cell cycle-stimulatory effects seen in Swiss 3T3 cells (see above). It is likely that these discrepancies are due to different signaling mechanisms in these different cell types, but the nature of these important differences has not been elucidated.
Recently, Cdc42p has been implicated in Ras-dependent transformation of NIH 3T3 cells. Expression of either dominant negative Cdc42T17N or the CRIB domain of the Cdc42p effectors PAK1 or WASP (see "Cdc42p downstream effectors" below) inhibited focus formation and soft-agar growth by H-RasG12V in a dose-dependent manner (445, 466, 494). In addition, stable expression of activated Cdc42G12V in Rat1 fibroblasts led to an increase in anchorage-independent growth in soft agar, and injection of Cdc42G12V-expressing cells into athymic nude mice led to the formation of tumors (466). These data, along with the observation that expression of the Cdc42F28L mutant protein can lead to transformation of NIH 3T3 cells similar to that seen with expression of the Cdc42-GEF dbl oncogene (327), indicate that activation of Cdc42 can lead to malignant transformation and that Cdc42 is a bona fide oncogene. Recent studies have shed some mechanistic light on the means by which Cdc42 mediates cellular transformation and cell cycle progression. In a detailed comparative study, it was observed that the transformation potential of Dbl GEF family members (see "Cdc42p regulators" below), including Dbl and Dbs, correlated most closely with the transcriptional induction of the cyclin D1 promoter and not with the activation of JNK, p38, SRF, or c-Jun (590). Cyclin D1-Cdk4/6 kinase complexes can phosphorylate the p105 RB retinoblastoma protein, leading to a dissociation of the E2F family of transcription factors that regulate the transcriptional activity of DNA replication genes necessary for the G1-S cell cycle transition (for a review, see reference 522). Ectopic expression of activated Cdc42G12Vp or RacG12V, but not RhoG12V, in NIH 3T3 cells led to an induction of transcription from an E2F-dependent reporter construct, an induction of p105 RB hyperphosphorylation, and a moderate induction of cyclin D1 protein levels (169). The Cdc42/Rac induction of E2F-dependent transcription was reduced in cells expressing the p16ink4, p21cip1, or p27kip1 CDK inhibitors. These data suggest that the effects of Cdc42 on the cell cycle are mediated, at least in part, through cyclin-CDK phosphorylation of RB and subsequent E2F-dependent transcriptional activation. These data are supported by the recent observation that the Rho GTPase plays a role in blocking the Ras-dependent induction of p21cip1, leading to an induction of cell cycle progression (380, 444). In addition, alterations in human capillary endothelial-cell shape and/or actin cytoskeletal structure led to a cyclin D- and p27kip1-dependent block in cell cycle progression (228), suggesting that the integrity of the actin cytoskeleton, as well as growth factors and integrin signaling, can affect progression through the cell cycle. The mechanism by which Cdc42 regulates these effects should be intensively investigated in the near future. Cdc42p, PAKs, and the JNK/SAPK and p38 protein kinase cascades have also been implicated in stress-activated programmed cell death (apoptosis) (32, 96, 143, 171, 230, 288, 496, 497). Programmed cell death in the immune system is mediated through the coupling of activated Fas receptors to the IL-converting enzyme (ICE) (caspase) protease cascade, which results in proteolytic cleavage of downstream targets, including the PAK2 protein kinase (496, 497, 583), the D4-GDI (409), and components of the JNK pathway (62, 245). Expression of wild-type or activated Cdc42Q61L in Jurkat T lymphocytes resulted in a decreased transfection frequency and induction of apoptotic responses, including characteristic DNA fragmentation and morphological changes (96). Also, expression of activated Cdc42G12V in rat sympathetic (SCG) neurons led to an induction of neuronal apoptosis through activation of the JNK pathway (32). These Cdc42-dependent apoptotic responses were inhibited by coexpression of dominant negative MEKK and MKK/SEK kinases. By contrast, apoptotic responses were induced by expression of a constitutively activated MEKK, indicating that activation of the JNK/SAPK signaling pathway is necessary for apoptotic responses in this cell type, as well as various other cell types (89, 193, 607, 621). These responses were also inhibited by various inhibitors of the ICE/caspase proteases (96; for a review, see reference 105), suggesting that the caspases function downstream of Cdc42p and further implicating PAK2 and D4-GDI in mediating these apoptotic responses. In mink lung epithelial (Mv1Lu) cells, TNF-
-induced JNK activation and apoptosis were dependent on another upstream kinase, ASK1,
which displayed sequence similarities to upstream kinases in the
S. cerevisiae HOG pathway (230). The Fas
receptor has recently been shown to activate ASK1 through interactions
with the receptor-associated adapter protein Daxx
(75), and expression of constitutively active
G
13 and G
12 mutants (see "Cdc42p/JNK
pathway and ion homeostasis" below) led to ASK1 activation and
induction of apoptosis (40). The mechanism by which
JNK induces apoptosis is unclear, but an interesting
observation is that the JNK1, JNK2, and JNK3 isoforms have potent in
vitro kinase activity against the tumor suppressor protein p53
(227) that affects p53 ubiquitination and stability
(155, 156); whether this activity depends on Cdc42p has not
been determined.
Cdc42p and Nef-dependent HIV replication. A fascinating connection has recently been made between Cdc42p and Nef-dependent HIV replication and pathogenesis (for reviews, see references 111 and 564). Nef associated with, and activated, a cellular Ser/Thr PAK-like kinase, the Nef-associated kinase (NAK). NAK shares epitopes with PAK but is not one of the three major PAK isoforms (335, 508) (see "PAK-like kinases" below). Activation of NAK appeared to be mediated through Cdc42p (and Rac), in that expression of dominant negative Cdc42T17N reduced NAK activity in transfected COS cells and expression of activated Cdc42G12V enhanced Nef association with and activation of NAK activity (335). This NAK activation also led to serum response element-dependent transcriptional induction that was blocked by Cdc42T17N expression. In addition, Cdc42T17N expression led to a reduction in HIV-1 production in transfected COS cells. Determination of the physiological role of Cdc42p in HIV pathogenesis should be active area of investigation in the near future.
Cdc42p/JNK pathway and ion homeostasis.
Activation of
mammalian NHE1, an integral membrane Na+-H+
exchanger subtype involved in regulating intracellular ion homeostasis and pH (421), by the G
13 GTPase is
mediated through the Cdc42-MEKK1-JNK pathway (40, 222, 580,
581). Although it is unclear whether these JNK pathway effects
are due to transcriptional activation of the NHE1 gene or induction of
NHE1 exchanger activity, expression of dominant negative MEKK1
inhibited the rapid activation of a G
13/G
z chimera by the
D2-dopamine receptor (222), suggesting that
transcriptional regulation is not involved. Recently, the p115 Rho-GEF
has been shown to act as a GAP for G
13 and
G
12 (275), and G
13 has
been shown to stimulate the guanine nucleotide exchange activity of
p115 Rho-GEF (207), which can lead to Tec/Bmx nonreceptor
tyrosine kinase-dependent induction of serum response factor-dependent
transcription (361-363). These results suggest a regulatory
connection between these G-protein
subunits and members of the
Rho/Rac family of GTPases. Analysis of G
13 knockout
mice indicated that G
13 functions in thrombin-dependent
cell migration, probably in a Cdc42p/actin-dependent manner, and in
vascular system development (433). In addition,
expression of constitutively active G
13 and
G
12 in differentiated PC12 cells led to Rho-dependent neurite retraction and cell rounding (255). Another
interesting connection between Cdc42p and ion channels was the
recent identification of the human homolog (IBP72) of the
S. pombe Skb1 protein kinase, which interacts with
the S. pombe PAK homolog Shk1/Pak1 (166) (see "S. pombe PAK-like kinases" below) in a two-hybrid
protein screen for proteins that interacted with the pICln protein, a putative component of the chloride channel (279). Given the
unclear nature of the role of pICln in chloride channel activation, the significance of this interaction remains to be determined.
Cdc42p and host cell responses to bacterial invasion. Cdc42p also plays a role in host signaling pathways that are activated in response to invasive bacteria (for reviews, see references 125 and 234). These pathways include actin rearrangements seen in Salmonella and Shigella invasion (see below), as well as JNK pathway-dependent induction of proinflammatory cytokines in epithelial cells in response to Neisseria gonorrhoeae invasion (414). Salmonella typhimurium can induce actin rearrangements and macropinocytosis in host cells (149), and expression of the dominant negative Cdc42T17N mutant protein in COS1 fibroblasts inhibited this induction and prevented internalization of the bacteria into the host cells (85). Expression of the activated Cdc42G12V mutant protein did not alter these processes with wild-type Salmonella, but it did allow an invasion-defective Salmonella mutant to invade COS1 and Rat-1 cells. Salmonella invasion also induced JNK kinase activity, and expression of the Cdc42T17N mutant protein prevented this bacterially induced activation. These Salmonella-induced effects were mediated by the Salmonella SopE protein (599), as evidenced by the ability of SopE both to act as a GEF for Cdc42p and Rac1p and to induce cytoskeletal rearrangements and JNK kinase activation (200). Therefore, aspects of Salmonella invasion are mediated through bacterial proteins impinging on host cell signal transduction pathways.
The effects of Cdc42 on actin rearrangements and invasion of HeLa cells by enteropathogenic E. coli (EPEC) were investigated by inhibiting Cdc42 function in three ways (33). Addition of compactin or ToxB led to disruption of normal actin structures in HeLa cells but did not block EPEC-induced formation of actin pedestal structures. Compactin inhibits Cdc42 function by inhibiting the 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase enzyme necessary for isoprene biosynthesis and subsequent isoprenylation, while ToxB, which is the Clostridium difficile toxin B protein, glucosylates and inactivates Cdc42 (247). Expression of the dominant negative Cdc42T17N mutant protein did not affect the formation of actin pedestals, but compactin and ToxB addition did inhibit the ability of EPEC to invade HeLa cells, suggesting that actin pedestal formation is not sufficient for EPEC invasion of HeLa cells. Interestingly, treatment of various mammalian cell lines with reagents that inhibited Rho activity, including Clostridium botulinum exoenzyme C3 transferase, inhibited the ability of Shigella flexneri to invade but did not affect invasion of Salmonella typhimurium (586), suggesting that Shigella flexneri utilizes host Rho protein for invasion. However, generation of the actin tail or "comet" produced by Shigella flexneri for its intracellular movement was dependent on the Cdc42p effector N-WASP (543) (see "Cdc42p downstream effectors" below), suggesting that bacterially induced actin rearrangements can be mediated through multiple Rho-type GTPases. These differences reinforce the notion that different bacteria use different invasion mechanisms (234). The future examination of Cdc42 effects on actin rearrangements and proinflammatory cytokine production in response to bacterial invasion should prove very exciting. In conclusion, an important question to consider is whether all of the above-mentioned effects of Cdc42 on mammalian cellular processes are mediated through interactions with PAKs and the JNK/SAPK MAP kinase pathways. Clearly, other Cdc42p downstream effectors that function independently of the JNK/SAPK pathway exist in mammalian cells, suggesting that there may be bifurcations in Cdc42p-regulated pathways (Fig. 4C) (see below). Therefore, the exact nature in which Cdc42p impinges on this myriad of mammalian cellular processes remains to be determined.CDC42P REGULATORS
|
|
|---|
Guanine Nucleotide Exchange Factors
The activation of G proteins from an inactive GDP-bound state to
an active GTP-bound state requires the action of a GEF. While the
structures of GEFs for different G-protein families (i.e., Ras,
Rho/Rac/Cdc42, Rab, Arf, and heterotrimerics) are quite dissimilar, the
mechanism of guanine nucleotide exchange seems to be conserved (for a
review, see reference 533). GEFs function by
stabilizing the nucleotide-free state of the G protein, through the
disruption of both Mg2+ and nucleotide binding sites and
subsequent GDP dissociation. However, the means by which GEFs
promote these effects can be quite different. GEFs for the
Rho/Rac/Cdc42 family of GTPases all contain a Dbl homology (DH)
domain (Fig. 5), which is a highly
-helical (331) catalytically active domain, and a PH
domain, which functions in membrane localization and has recently been shown to enhance DH-domain-dependent nucleotide exchange
(331).
|
S. cerevisiae Cdc24p. Cdc24p is believed to be the sole GEF for Cdc42p in S. cerevisiae. CDC24 mutants were among the original cdc mutants isolated and characterized by Hartwell et al. (211-213). The initial analysis of cdc24ts mutants indicated that Cdc24p plays a role in bud emergence, with cdc24ts mutants exhibiting a first cycle arrest as large, round unbudded cells with multiple nuclei. The presence of multiple nuclei in arrested cells was the first evidence that the budding cycle was independent of the DNA synthesis and nuclear division cycles in S. cerevisiae. Interestingly, overexpression of Cdc24p led to similar morphological phenotypes (504, 641), indicating that either a lack or an excess of Cdc24p leads to a loss of cell polarity, presumably through the disruption of multiprotein complexes (see below). Other phenotypes associated with cdc24ts mutants were delocalized chitin deposition throughout the cell instead of the typical chitin ring formation at the mother-bud neck region (528, 529) and defects in bud site selection and localized deposition of mannan (528), localized secretion of acid phosphatase (146), and mating (416, 472) (see below). Delocalized chitin deposition in cdc24 mutants is probably due to the altered assembly of the 10-nm filament septin ring, which is necessary for proper chitin ring formation (119). Disruption of CDC24 led to death (106), indicating that Cdc24p had an essential function in cell growth. The cdc24-3 and cdc24-4 mutant alleles displayed abnormal elongated buds when grown at semipermissive temperatures (528), suggesting that Cdc24p plays a role in the apical-isotropic switch (see "S. cerevisiae" under "Functional studies" above). They also displayed defects in bud site selection to a discrete, nonrandom site in both haploids and diploids (528), suggesting that Cdc24p is involved in the bud site selection process (see below). When cdc24-4ts cells were arrested in S phase with hydroxyurea and then released into media at the restrictive temperature, the predominant arrest phenotype observed consisted of large mother cells with small buds (528), suggesting that Cdc24p also functions after bud emergence to direct growth preferentially into the enlarging bud instead of in the nonenlarging mother cell.
In a screen for S. cerevisiae mutants sensitive to 100 mM Ca2+ in the growth media, 1 of 30 Ca2+-sensitive mutants, csl4, was shown by complementation and genetic linkage tests to be allelic to CDC24 (436, 438). The cls4 mutant arrested in medium containing 100 mM Ca2+ with large, round unbudded cells and had wild-type levels of intracellular Ca2+ and normal rates of uptake of Ca2+, indicating that the Ca2+-sensitive phenotype was not due to an alteration in Ca2+ homeostasis but was more likely to be due to an alteration in a Ca2+-regulated process. Certain cdc24 alleles were also sensitive to high-Na+ growth media and showed synthetic lethality with a vma5 vacuolar ATPase subunit mutant (591), suggesting that Cdc24p may have functions outside its normal role in cell polarity. Taken together, these data indicate that Cdc24p has essential functions in bud site selection, organization of the cell polarity machinery at the bud site, polarized growth into an enlarging bud during the cell cycle, and mating and that calcium may play an important role in Cdc24p function. These functions coincide with Cdc42p functions (see "Functional studies" above), reinforcing the physiological connection between these two proteins. Cdc24p is a ~97-kDa protein with no apparent homologs in the S. cerevisiae genome. Cdc24p contains three recognizable functional domains (Fig. 5), including a DH domain that shows a high degree of similarity to the Dbl family of GEFs (residues 283 to 452 [see below]), a PH domain (residues 472 to 681), and two potential Ca2+ binding domains (residues 649 to 658 and 820 to 831) inferred through homology to the
-lactalbumin and S-100a
Ca2+ binding domains, respectively (396).
It should be noted that one of the
Ca2+-sensitive mutations, cls4-2, is within the
DH domain, suggesting that Ca2+ plays a role in Cdc24p GEF
activity. The observation that overexpression of either
S. cerevisiae or human Cdc42p can suppress a
cdc24ts mutant (35, 407), along
with the similarity in cdc24 and cdc42 mutant
phenotypes (see above), suggested that Cdc24p is a GEF for Cdc42p. This
possibility was addressed both genetically and biochemically
(630, 641). Overexpression of Cdc24p was able to
suppress the dominant negative cdc42D118A
mutant (641), suggesting that the dominant negative effect
was due to the binding and sequestration of Cdc24p away from endogenous Cdc42p. This inference was substantiated by analysis of two-hybrid protein interactions between Cdc24p and Cdc42p (116). A
GST-Cdc24p fusion protein stimulated GDP dissociation from a GST-Cdc42p
fusion protein in vitro with a half time of ~5 min and also led to a four- to fivefold increase in [35S]GTP
S binding to
GST-Cdc42p (630). Cdc24p did not display these biochemical
activities against either Rho1p or Rsr1p/Bud1p (see below). In
addition, Cdc24p interacted tightly with a guanine nucleotide-depleted
GST-Cdc42p, slightly less so with GST-Cdc42-GDP, and less still with
GST-Cdc42-GTP
S (629). These observations are
consistent with interactions seen between human Cdc42p and the Dbl GEF
and suggest that Cdc24p functions to stabilize the nucleotide-depleted
form of Cdc42p as a prelude to guanine nucleotide exchange. These
results, along with the observations that Cdc24p is an essential
protein with no significant homologs in the S. cerevisiae
genome, suggest that Cdc24p is the sole physiological GEF for Cdc42p in
S. cerevisiae.
By using Cdc24p-specific antisera, it was shown that Cdc24p
fractionated to a particulate pool (383, 397, 465) and
seemed to be present at the plasma membrane around the entire periphery of the cell in immunofluorescence microscopy experiments
(465). However, recent studies with functional GFP-Cdc24p
fusion proteins indicate that Cdc24p localizes to the plasma membrane
at the site of incipient bud emergence and to the mother-bud neck
region in large-budded cells (508b). The mechanism by which
Cdc24p is membrane associated is unknown, but it may be through its PH
domain or through interactions with other proteins (see below).
(i) Cdc24p-Rsr1p/Bud1p interactions.
Besides
interacting with Cdc42p (see "GEF interaction domains" above),
Cdc24p interacts with Rsr1p/Bud1p, Bem1p, and the Ste4p G
subunit. Rsr1p was originally identified in a genetic
screen for multicopy suppressors of a
cdc24-4ts mutant (35). DNA and
predicted amino acid sequence analyses indicated that Rsr1p
belonged to the Ras subfamily of the Ras superfamily of
GTPases. Rsr1p showed 57% identity to the first 120 amino acids of
c-Ha-Ras protein and yeast Ras1p and Ras2p; its closest homolog
is the Krev-1/rap1a protein, with 56% identity over the
entire protein. Deletion of Rsr1p did not result in death, indicating
that Rsr1p is not essential for growth, but it did result in a random
bud site selection pattern, as occurs with certain cdc24
alleles (see above), suggesting that the role of Rsr1p may be in the
selection of the nonrandom site for bud emergence. This possibility was
confirmed when rsr1 mutants were identified in a screen for
mutants defective in establishing a normal axial budding pattern
(80). This screen identified five genes, designated BUD1 through BUD5, of which BUD1 was
shown to be allelic to RSR1. Subsequent genetic and
biochemical analyses have indicated that Bud2p is a GAP and Bud5p is a
GEF for the Rsr1p/Bud1p GTPase (34, 64, 79, 81, 448, 450,
462).
S with Cdc24p
(449, 629), as well as by the inability of the
rsr1/bud1T35A effector domain mutant to suppress
a cdc24 mutant (383, 449) or to bind to Cdc24p
(449). A truncated protein containing residues 472 to
854 of Cdc24p, which encompasses the PH domain and the potential
Ca2+ binding domains (Fig. 5), was capable of interacting
with Rsr1p/Bud1p (449); the effects of added
Ca2+ on Cdc24p-Rsr1p/Bud1p interactions were not tested.
Interestingly, the Bem1p scaffold protein (see below)
preferentially bound to GDP-bound Rsr1p/Bud1p
(449), suggesting that Rsr1p/Bud1p has differential binding
partners depending on its nucleotide-bound state. Binding of
Cdc24p to GST-Rsr1p/Bud1p in vitro did not affect the Bud5p-dependent
GEF activity on Rsr1p/Bud1p, and binding of GST-Rsr1p/Bud1p to either
GDP or GTP
S did not affect the in vitro Cdc24p-dependent GEF
activity on Cdc42p (629). However, added Cdc24p did inhibit
the intrinsic and GAP-stimulated GTPase activity of Rsr1p/Bud1p,
suggesting that binding of Cdc24p to Rsr1p/Bud1p stabilizes the
GTP-bound form of Rsr1p/Bud1p. These results suggest that
Cdc24p may act to connect the Rsr1p/Bud1p-dependent bud site selection process and the Cdc42p-dependent bud site organization and
polarized growth processes.
Rsr1p/Bud1p contains a canonical C-terminal CAAX farnesylation site,
which is modified, leading to membrane localization. However, there are
conflicting data on the subcellular localization of Rsr1p/Bud1p. One
study, using polyclonal anti-Bud1p antibodies, indicated that the
protein was distributed entirely to the particulate fraction and was
localized around the entire periphery of the cell (383),
while another study indicated that ~10% of a HA-tagged Rsr1p/Bud1p
was in a soluble fraction (449). There also are
conflicting results on the effects of guanine nucleotide on these
fractionation patterns. One study showed no dependence on the
guanine nucleotide-bound state of Rsr1p/Bud1p (i.e., presumably
GTP-bound Bud1G12Vp and presumably GDP-bound
Bud1K16Np both fractionated solely to the particulate
fraction) or on the Bud2p GAP or the Bud5p GEF (383).
Another study showed Bud1G12Vp in both soluble and
particulate pools but Bud1K16Np only in a particulate
pool (449), suggesting that GDP-bound Rsr1p/Bud1p was always
membrane bound. These discrepancies must be resolved before it is
possible to conclude that Rsr1p/Bud1p cycles on and off the membrane as
part of its cellular function. Based on the above data, a possible role
for Rsr1p/Bud1p is in the targeting and/or anchoring of Cdc24p to the
plasma membrane at the site of incipient bud emergence. However,
Rsr1p/Bud1p was not necessary for the Cdc24p particulate fractionation
pattern (383) (see above) or for localization of Cdc42p to
the tips of mating projections (133), suggesting that the
membrane localization of Cdc24p and Cdc42p does not solely depend on
their interactions with Rsr1p/Bud1p.
(ii) Cdc24p-Bem1p interactions.
Bem1p was identified
in three different genetic screens: as a synthetic lethal mutant
with msb1 (36), a mutant that was identified as a
multicopy suppressor of the cdc24-4ts and
cdc42-1ts alleles (35); as
a synthetic lethal mutant with a bud5 allele (79); and as a mutant with mating defects that were due to
an inability to form mating projections (90, 91). The
bem1ts alleles analyzed displayed large,
unbudded, multinucleate cells with delocalized chitin and actin
reminiscent of cdc24 and cdc42 alleles. Bem1p
is not essential but is important for growth, in that
bem1 cells grew slowly at 23 and 30°C, but were
ts and cs for growth (90); however,
this phenotype was strain specific in that the
bem1
mutation was lethal in other strain backgrounds (294). Bem1p
fractionated to both particulate and soluble pools and appears to be a
phosphoprotein, as evidenced by a protein mobility shift on sodium
dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis upon phosphatase
addition (303). Bem1p localized to the site of incipient bud
emergence and to the tips of small buds (21, 465), as do
Cdc24p and Cdc42p. This localization was not disrupted by incubation
with the actin-depolymerizing drug latrunculin-A (21),
suggesting that Bem1p localization occurs independently of actin localization.
-factor resistance
and G1 arrest defect of a fus3-2 mutant
(339). In the former screen, Mdg1p was also identified;
overexpression of this 41-kDa unique protein could also suppress the
bem1-s1 mating defects. In the latter study, it was also
shown that Bem1p interacts with Far1p, a Cdc28-cyclin inhibitor, and
can stimulate Fus3p protein kinase activity.
Bem1p may link Cdc42p- and Rho-dependent processes. It was observed
that bem1 mutants exhibited synthetic lethality with
bem2 mutants (458) (Bem2p is a Rho-GAP) and that
overexpression of Bem1p suppressed the lethality of a
rho3
rho4 double mutation (375). This suppression was
mediated by the second SH3 domain and the C-terminal 35 amino acids of
Bem1p (37, 374). The same two domains are essential for
Bem1p function in vivo, as evidenced by results with loss-of-function
bem1 mutations (374). The second SH3 domain of
Bem1p also interacts with two functionally redundant proteins, Boi1p
and Boi2p, through their proline-rich domains (37, 374).
Boi1p and Boi2p are structurally similar, each containing a N-terminal
SH3 domain, a central proline-rich domain, and a C-terminal PH domain.
The
boi1
boi2 double mutant displayed bud emergence
defects and poor viability, which could be suppressed by overexpression
of Rho3p or Rho4p (37, 374). Mutational analysis indicated
that the C-terminal PH domain, but not the SH3 domain or the
proline-rich region, is necessary and sufficient for Boi1p morphological function (37). In addition, overexpression of Boi1p or Boi2p alone (37, 374) or with Rho3p (37)
led to impaired growth and large, unbudded, multinucleate
cells, which could be suppressed by overexpression of Cdc42p
(37). Interestingly, Boi1p interacted with Cdc42p, but not
Rho1p, Rho2p, Rho3p, or Rho4p, in two-hybrid protein assays, and this
interaction was through the Boi1p PH domain.
Taken together, these data indicate that Bem1p interacts with numerous
proteins that are necessary for the budding cycle and the mating cycle,
and although its role in the budding cycle is unclear beyond its
ability to interact with multiple components, its role in the mating
cycle seems to be in activating the pheromone response kinase cascade
through interactions with Ste20p, Ste5p, and kinase components.
(iii) Cdc24p-Ste4p interactions.
Several lines of
evidence suggest that Cdc24p functions within the
S. cerevisiae mating pathway through interactions with the
Ste4p G
subunit and Cdc42p and that it functions prior to cell-cell fusion, possibly by affecting the orientation of mating-projection formation in response to localized high
concentrations of pheromone (91, 416, 472, 527, 626). The
original cdc24ts mutants had reduced mating
efficiencies (472), and the cdc24-4ts
strain had modest defects in pheromone-induced, Ste4p-dependent transcriptional activation. These defects could be
suppressed by overexpression of wild-type or activated
CDC42 alleles (527, 626). New
cdc24 mutant alleles have been identified in genetic screens
for mutants that have either reduced mating efficiencies with
mating-enfeebled partners (91) or reduced mating
efficiencies with wild-type partners but no effects on the vegetative
role of Cdc24p (i.e., wild-type growth, morphology, bud site selection, and actin distribution [416]). The latter
cdc24-m1, cdc24-m2, and cdc24-m3
mutants had wild-type phenotypes with respect to pheromone-induced cell cycle arrest, transcriptional activation, mating-projection formation, and actin polarization but had defects in
cell-cell fusion, an inability to properly orient to a mating-pheromone gradient, and decreased mating efficiencies with mating-enfeebled partners, suggesting that Cdc24p may be playing a role in
mating-projection orientation in response to mating pheromone.
subunit Ste18p, but in vitro GST affinity chromatography experiments
indicated that Cdc24p could interact directly with Ste4p in the absence
of other yeast proteins (416). Whether interactions between
Cdc24p and Ste4p occur in vivo awaits coimmunoprecipitation experiments, but these in vitro and two-hybrid protein data suggest that Cdc24p functions in mating-projection orientation through interactions with the Ste4p G
subunit. It is not clear
whether Cdc24p is serving as a GEF for Cdc42p in this process or if
Cdc24p and Cdc42p are localized to mating projections in the
cdc24-m1, cdc24-m2, and cdc24-m3 mutants.
S. pombe GEF.
A potential Cdc24 homolog,
named Scd1p, was identified in S. pombe in a genetic screen
for mutants with mating defects and round cells (73). Scd1p
showed 32% identity to Cdc24p, and this identity was found throughout
the coding region, including amino acids 194 to 254 (containing the DH
domain) (Fig. 5). Scd1p is the same protein as Ral1p, also identified
as a mutant with mating and morphological defects (159).
Surprisingly, a scd1 deletion did not lead to cell
inviability, as a cdc24 deletion does in S. cerevisiae, but it did result in mating defects and
round cells. This result brings into question whether Scd1p is the sole
physiological GEF for the essential GTPase Cdc42p; this has not
been tested biochemically to date. Overexpression of
S. cerevisiae Cdc24p could partially suppress the mating
and morphological defects of a scd1 mutant, and although
overexpression of S. pombe Cdc42p could not suppress the
same defects, it did enhance the suppression by
S. cerevisiae Cdc24p. This result is again different from
results with S. cerevisiae, in which overexpression of
Cdc42p can suppress cdc24ts mutants. In
two-hybrid protein assays, Scd1p could interact with Scd2p, a
potential Bem1p homolog that was identified in the same genetic screen.
In addition, Scd1p could interact with S. pombe Cdc42p, but
only when Scd2p or S. pombe Ras1p was overexpressed in
the same cells, suggesting that Scd1p may have to be bound to Scd2p or
activated by Ras1p in order to interact with Cdc42p. Scd1p also
interacted with Ras1p in the presence of overexpressed Scd2p or after
the N-terminal 671 amino acids of Scd1p were deleted (Scd1
Np); it
could also interact with activated mutations of human H-Ras.
Interactions between Scd1
Np and Scd2p were corroborated by GST
affinity chromatography experiments. While interactions between
S. pombe Scd1p, Scd2p, and Ras1p are reminiscent of
interactions between S. cerevisiae Cdc24p, Bem1p, and
Rsr1p/Bud1p (see above), there remain questions about the physiological
role of Scd1p in S. pombe as a potential GEF for Cdc42p.
Drosophila and C. elegans GEFs. Three potential Cdc42 GEFs have been identified in Drosophila to date: Drt-GEF (589), still life (sif) (532), and DRho-GEF2 (29, 190). However, none has been shown to have either in vitro or in vivo GEF activity against Cdc42p. The 658-amino-acid Drt-GEF contains an N-terminal SH3 domain followed by a DH domain and a PH domain. Drt-GEF mRNA is expressed during oogenesis and embryogenesis and seems to be concentrated in the ventral furrow, cephalic furrow, posterior midgut, and anterior midgut involutions, areas which undergo actin-dependent morphological changes during gastrulation. The still life (sif) mutant was identified by reduced locomotor behavior, and the sif gene encodes two differentially spliced products. Both contain two PH domains, a PDZ domain, and a DH domain as well as potential PEST sequences. The sif mRNA was found predominantly in the brain and ventral nerve cord, and anti-Sif antibodies were localized to the neuropils, the location at which neurites form synapses, in both embryonic and adult brains. Overexpression of full-length Sif was not associated with a phenotype, but overexpression of a N-terminal truncation mutant missing the sequences before the first PH domain resulted in defects in axonal extension in Drosophila and induced membrane ruffling in human KB cells. This mutant protein colocalized with actin structures at the ruffles. DRho-GEF2 was identified as a dominant suppressor, Su(Rho1)2B, of DRho1 overexpression (29) and in a screen for maternal effects of zygotic lethal mutations (190). The Su(Rho1)2B mutation could not suppress the DRac1 and Cdc42Dm overexpression phenotypes, suggesting that DRho-GEF2 has Rho1-specific functions. DRho-GEF2 is ~284 kDa and contains an N-terminal PDZ domain followed by a potential phorbol ester/diacylglyceride binding domain, a DH domain, and a PH domain. Mutants defective in DRho-GEF2 function have abnormalities in ventral-furrow formation and anterior and posterior midgut invaginations that are qualitatively similar to those associated with ectopic expression of a dominant negative Rho1N19 mutant protein and not seen with ectopic expression of dominant negative Cdc42 or Rac1 mutant proteins. This result reinforces the possibility that DRho-GEF2 is an in vivo GEF for Rho1.
As mentioned above (see "C. elegans" under "Functional studies"), the C. elegans unc-73 gene product exhibits structural homologies to the Dbl family of GEFs and has guanine nucleotide exchange activity against CeRac1 but not CeCdc42 in vitro (536); whether it is a GEF for Cdc42p in vivo is unknown. No other potential C. elegans GEFs have been described to date.Mammalian GEFs. There are multiple potential Cdc42p-GEFs in mammalian cells, including the Dbl, Dbs, Ost, Bcr, and Abr oncoproteins, the Tiam-1 invasion-inducing protein, the PAK-interacting exchange factor PIX, the FGD1 faciogenital dysplasia protein, and the Brx estrogen receptor binding auxiliary protein (for reviews, see references 44, 71, 441, and 594). The prototypical mammalian GEF is the Dbl oncoprotein, originally identified by malignant transformation of NIH 3T3 cells with transfected DNA from a human B-cell lymphoma (138, 534). Comparison of the predicted amino acid sequence of proto-Dbl with the Cdc24p GEF and the Bcr oncoprotein identified a ~200-amino-acid domain (residues 498 to 674 in Dbl) with significant sequence similarity (491). Deletion of or mutations in this DH domain (Fig. 5), including the replacement of the highly conserved LLLKELL sequence at amino acids 640 to 646 with the conservative IIIRDII sequence, resulted in loss of Dbl-transforming activity and GDP dissociation activity (206, 491), suggesting that the DH domain is necessary for both activities. Expression of the Dbl DH domain by itself in NIH 3T3 cells did not lead to cellular transformation (634), but fusion of the DH domain to GST resulted in a protein with fully functional exchange activity against Cdc42Hs (206), suggesting that the DH domain is not sufficient for transformation but is sufficient for GEF activity. It should be noted that DH domains have been found in all known or potential Cdc42-GEFs identified to date but that the presence of a DH domain does not determine that a protein will have in vivo Cdc42-GEF activity. Dbl has in vitro GEF activity (i.e., ability to stimulate GDP dissociation from and promote GTP binding to a GTPase) against platelet and recombinant Cdc42Hs (205, 206) as well as RhoA and membrane-bound Rac1 (206, 443, 611), and it is able to bind to the Rho family members Cdc42Hs, RhoA, and Rac1 (206) and murine Cdc42, Rho, RhoC, Rac1, and RhoG (389) in GST affinity chromatography experiments, suggesting that it has a broad in vitro specificity range. Dbl binding to Cdc42 was observed with nucleotide-free Cdc42p and to a lesser extent with GDP-bound Cdc42p but not with GTP-bound Cdc42p (206, 389), suggesting that Dbl may stabilize a nucleotide-free or GDP-bound state of Cdc42p.
All known Dbl family members also have a ~100-amino-acid PH domain, ubiquitously found C-terminal to the DH domain (Fig. 5). Expression of the Dbl PH domain by itself in NIH 3T3 cells did not lead to cellular transformation but did inhibit the transforming ability of full-length Dbl in a specific manner not seen with expression of the Vav or Cdc24 PH domain (634). Deletion of the Dbl PH domain (residues 703 to 812) or addition of a GST-PH fusion domain had no effect on the DH-dependent GEF activity. However, recent studies suggest that the presence of a PH domain enhances the DH catalytic activity (331). In immunoprecipitation studies with NIH 3T3 cells, usually more than 50% of the Dbl protein was found in Triton X-100-insoluble fractions (178, 634), suggesting that Dbl is localized to the cytoskeletal matrix. Deletion of the Dbl PH domain resulted in a protein with a cytosolic fractionation pattern; addition of the Ras membrane localization signal could restore the particulate fractionation pattern but not the transforming activity of Dbl (634). In addition, a FLAG epitope-tagged Dbl PH domain fractionated to the Triton X-100-insoluble pool. These data suggest that the Dbl PH domain is necessary and sufficient for targeting of Dbl to its proper subcellular location, a function that seems to be conserved in a number of Dbl family members. The Ost and Dbs Dbl family members have significant amino acid sequence similarity to Dbl both inside and outside of the DH and PH domains (224, 592). Both proteins have in vitro GEF activity against Cdc42Hs and RhoA but not against Rac1. The Bcr and Abr proteins have in vitro GEF activity against Cdc42, RhoA, Rac1, and Rac2 (95); the Bcr protein contains an N-terminal Ser/Thr kinase domain, and both proteins contain C-terminal GAP domains that are functional against Rac1 and Rac2 and to a lesser extent against Cdc42 (see "GTPase-activating proteins" below). While the Tiam-1 protein has in vitro GEF activity against RhoA, Cdc42Hs, and Rac1 (385), in vivo studies strongly suggest that Tiam-1 activity is mediated through Rac1 (131, 189, 223, 386, 535). The PIX GEFs are new members of the Dbl family that were identified as high-affinity binding partners with PAK1 (360). These proteins display in vitro GEF activity against Cdc42 and Rac1, but as with Tiam-1, the in vivo target may be solely Rac1. Interestingly, PIX localized to focal complexes, as did PAK and Cdc42, and it may act in a Cdc42-independent targeting mechanism for targeting PAKs to focal complexes (see "PAK-like kinases" below). The faciogenital dysplasia protein (FGD1), which is encoded by the genetic locus responsible for Aarskog-Scott syndrome (452, 453), is believed to be a Cdc42-specific GEF in vivo. This inference is based on the observations that (i) an epitope-tagged FGD1 polypeptide containing its DH and PH domains bound specifically to Cdc42, but not to Rho or Rac, in GST affinity chromatography experiments (631); (ii) the same FGD1 polypeptide displayed in vitro GEF activity against Cdc42 but not Rho or Rac (631); (iii) microinjection of FGD1 into Swiss 3T3 fibroblasts led to a stimulation of G1 cell cycle progression, induction of filopodia, and activation of the JNK and p70 S6 kinases in a manner similar to activated alleles of Cdc42p (410, 443, 631); and (iv) FGD1 induction of filopodia was blocked by coexpression of either the dominant negative Cdc42T17N mutant protein (631) or the WASP CRIB domain (410). However, recent evidence suggests that FGD1 may have Cdc42-independent functions in certain signaling pathways (410, 593). Interestingly, a FGD1-related protein, termed frabin, has recently been identified and shown to interact with actin and induce JNK activation and actin-dependent cell shape changes in Swiss 3T3 cells (426); whether frabin has Cdc42 GEF activity was not tested. The Brx estrogen receptor-binding auxiliary protein contains DH and PH domains as well as a diacylglycerol binding domain, and it is believed to function through Cdc42p because expression of the dominant negative Cdc42T17N protein led to a decrease in Brx-dependent induction of estrogen receptor transcriptional activity (495). However, Brx has not been shown to have in vitro or in vivo GEF activity against Cdc42p or other Rho-type GTPases. There is recent evidence suggesting that these GEFs have the ability to differentially modulate Cdc42-dependent downstream effects. For instance, Dbl was able to stimulate PAK1 activation in COS7 cells to a higher degree than it could stimulate JNK activation, while FGD1 stimulated JNK activation but was unable to stimulate PAK1 activation (635). However, despite this wealth of information on potential mammalian Cdc42p GEFs, the physiologically relevant Cdc42p GEFs and the processes they regulate have not been definitively identified.GTPase-Activating Proteins
The transition of G proteins from an active GTP-bound state to an inactive GDP-bound state occurs through the intrinsic hydrolysis of GTP to GDP + inorganic phosphate (Pi), a process that can be significantly stimulated by the action of GAPs. Cdc42p displays a ~10-fold higher intrinsic (GAP-independent) rate of GTP hydrolysis compared to Ras proteins (210), and this rate can be further stimulated by the addition of GTPase-activating proteins. It has been postulated that differences in the GTP binding domain (residues 115 to 118 in Cdc42p) may account for the higher rate of GTP hydrolysis, but this has not been experimentally tested to date. Recently, it was shown that Cdc42p can undergo homodimer formation in vitro and that this homodimer formation can lead to a Cdc42-GTP-stimulated increase in intrinsic GTPase activity (623). In addition, the C-terminal polybasic region of Cdc42p, and specifically the R186 residue, was shown to be necessary for homodimer formation and for this GAP activity (622, 623). Introduction of the K186R mutation into S. cerevisiae Cdc42p leads to an increase in intrinsic GAP activity in vitro, a ts loss-of-function phenotype in vivo, and abnormal cell morphologies at the permissive temperature (622), reinforcing a potential physiological role of the polybasic region in intrinsic GAP activity.
S. cerevisiae Cdc42p GAPs.
Bem3p,
Rga1p/Dbm1p, and Rga2p are three potential Cdc42p GAPs identified
in S. cerevisiae, but only Bem3p has been shown to have GAP activity against Cdc42p in vitro (630). Bem3p was
originally isolated as a multicopy suppressor of
bem2ts mutants (36, 630). The 125-kDa
Bem3p contains a C-terminal domain (residues 977 to 1140) with
significant similarity to Bem2p and other Rho-GAPs
(630), and this GAP domain can be subdivided into
three subdomains with various levels of sequence similarity (633). Bem3p also contains a PH domain (residues 633 to
739). An E. coli-produced GST-Bem3p GAP domain (residues 751 to 1128) fusion protein had in vitro GAP activity against a GST-Cdc42p fusion protein that was not competed by the GST-Bem2p GAP domain fusion
protein (630). The GST-Bem3p GAP domain fusion protein also
had in vitro GAP activity against human Cdc42Hs but not against the
GTPase-defective Cdc42G12V mutant protein,
and it did not affect the binding of GTP to Cdc42Hs (633). Analysis of Bem3p GAP domain deletions
indicated that all three GAP homology subdomains were necessary for GAP
activity, but analysis of chimeras between Bem2p and Bem3p GAP
subdomains indicated that the two N-terminal subdomains were sufficient
for Cdc42p binding and GAP activity, albeit at ~30% of the GST-Bem3p levels (633). Bem3p interacted with Cdc42p, but not with
other Rho-type GTPases, in a two-hybrid protein assay; this
interaction was enhanced with the GTPase-defective
Cdc42Q61L mutant protein (537). A
bem3 strain was viable with no morphological abnormalities (references 537 and
630 and data not shown).
subunit, as assayed by
FUS1::HIS3 expression (537, 538). Dbm1p
was identified as a dominant suppressor of a
bem2ts mutant (84). The
RGA1/DBM1 gene encodes a predicted ~113-kDa protein that
contains a C-terminal Rho-GAP domain and two N-terminal LIM domains
(84, 537), which are thought to bind zinc ions and mediate
protein-protein interactions (117, 384). Deletion of
RGA1 did not lead to death, indicating that it is not
essential for growth, but the
rga1 mutation led to a
shift in the haploid bud site selection pattern from axial to bipolar
and increased the expression of a FUS1::lacZ
reporter gene (84, 537). Overexpression of Rga1p led to a
decrease in FUS1::lacZ expression, which is consistent with Rga1p playing a negative role in the regulation of the
pheromone response pathway, as well as a reduction in the restrictive
temperature for the cdc42-1ts allele
(537) and a reversal of the ability of overexpressed Cdc42p
to suppress a cdc24ts mutant (465).
The
rga1 mutation raised the restrictive temperature of a
cdc24ts mutant and restored wild-type morphology
to a cdc24ts mutant at 30°C (537),
which is consistent with Rga1p acting in opposition to Cdc24p as a
negative regulator of Cdc42p function. While
rga1 and
bem3 single mutants had modest morphological defects, a
rga1
bem3 double mutant displayed an aberrant
morphology of elongated cells with enlarged mother-bud neck regions
reminiscent of cells delayed in the apical-isotropic switch, suggesting
that Cdc42p must be inactivated to induce this switch (84,
537). Interestingly, the double mutant was still viable,
suggesting that there may be additional Cdc42-GAPs (see below).
Rga1p interacted with Cdc42p, but not other Rho-type
GTPases, in a two-hybrid protein assay; this interaction was
enhanced with the GTPase-defective Cdc42Q61L mutant
protein (537) and lost with the Cdc42V44A
effector domain mutant protein (475a). Rga1p also did not
interact with the Ste20p, Ste5p, Ste11p, Ste7p, or Fus3p components of the pheromone response pathway. Taken together, these data suggest that
Rga1p is a negative regulator of Cdc42p within the mating pathway and
possibly in the budding pathway and that it may be functioning as a
GAP, although biochemical characterization of a Rga1p GAP activity has
not been reported.
Another potential Cdc42-GAP, Rga2p, was identified through
its homology to Rga1p (532a). Rga2p contains a
Rho-GAP domain and two LIM domains, and as with Rga1p,
overexpression of Rga2p decreased the restrictive temperature of
the cdc42-1ts allele and a
rga2 mutation raised the restrictive temperature of
a cdc24ts mutant. However, a physiological role
for Rga2p has not been determined.
Drosophila and C. elegans GAPs. To date, the only potential Cdc42-GAP identified in Drosophila is the RnRac-GAP, the product of the rotund locus (7, 180, 181). Although RnRac-GAP has not been shown to have GAP activity against Cdc42p, overexpression of RnRac-GAP led to defects in actin organization similar to those seen with Drosophila cdc42 mutants (see "Drosophila" under "Functional studies" above).
The only potential Cdc42-GAP identified to date in C. elegans is the Ce-GAP isolated via DNA-DNA hybridization with the GAP domain from the mammalian Bcr GAP (86). However, a GST-Ce-GAP GAP domain fusion protein had in vitro GAP activity against all three Rho-like GTPases in C. elegans (Ce-Rac1, CDC42Ce, and Ce-RhoA), as well as the C. elegans Ras homolog Let-60. Therefore, this Ce-GAP has an even higher degree of in vitro biochemical promiscuity than mammalian GAPs (see below), and the physiological role of this GAP remains to be determined.Mammalian GAPs. At least 12 mammalian proteins have in vitro GAP activity against Cdc42p, including CDC42GAP/p50rhoGAP (28, 163, 164, 210, 293, 403), Bcr (124), Abr (95, 215, 548), p190GAP (518), n-chimaerin (8, 276, 357), 3BP-1 (98, 99), Graf (219, 553), RalBP1/RLIP76/RIP1 (65, 244, 451), MgcRacGAP (562), PARG1 (506), myr5 (406, 474), and Cd-GAP (292). However, most of these proteins also have in vitro activity against Rac and Rho proteins (for review, see references 290 and 572), and so the assignment of a subset of these GAPs as specific in vivo Cdc42-GAPs has proven difficult.
In initial in vitro GAP assays, CDC42GAP/p50rhoGAP showed a significant preference for Cdc42p over RhoA or Rac (28, 293, 481). Subsequently, in three different in vitro GAP assays (2-amino-6-mercapto-7-methylpurine ribonucleoside-phosphorylase-coupled assay, [
-32P]GTP filter binding assay, and
tryptophan fluorescence methods), it was determined that
CDC42GAP/p50rhoGAP had ~60-fold-enhanced catalytic efficiency against
Cdc42 compared to Bcr, 3BP-1, and p190 (624). However,
microinjection of the CDC42GAP/p50rhoGAP GAP domain into
Swiss 3T3 cells led to an inhibition of actin-dependent stress fibers,
suggesting that it may inhibit RhoA function within these cells
(481). Bcr has in vitro GAP activity against Cdc42p and Rac,
but microinjection of the Bcr-GAP domain into Swiss 3T3 cells led to
inhibition of membrane ruffling, suggesting that Bcr interacts
with Rac to regulate ruffling in these cells (481). However, while analysis of bcr-null mutants
corroborated the interactions between Bcr and Rac, the data indicated
that the cellular functions of Bcr were related to the Rac-dependent
neutrophil respiratory burst and not to membrane ruffling
(579), suggesting that overexpression of the Bcr-GAP domain
may have pleiotropic effects in Swiss 3T3 cells.
The p190GAP has in vitro GAP activity against Cdc42p, Rac, RhoA, and
RhoB (518), with a ~ninefold-increased activity against Rho, and microinjection of p190GAP into Swiss 3T3 cells led to an
inhibition of stress fiber formation (481), suggesting
that Rho is its physiological substrate. The p190GAP interacted
with Ras-GAP through its SH2 domains (56, 226, 518, 519),
and the two proteins colocalized to actin structures in EGF-stimulated cells (76), providing a possible mechanistic link
between the Ras and Rho signaling pathways. The
n-chimaerin GAP has in vitro GAP activity against Rac1
preferentially over Cdc42p, but expression of dominant
negative Cdc42T17N in Swiss 3T3 cells inhibited
n-chimaerin-induced filopodium formation and expression of
dominant negative RacT17N inhibited the
n-chimaerin-induced lamellipodium formation
(276), suggesting that n-chimaerin can function
with both GTPases in vivo. The SH3 domain of Graf interacted with
the focal adhesion kinase and localized to cortical actin structures
(219), but there are no data to discriminate between Cdc42p
or RhoA as its in vivo substrate. Microinjection of the 3BP-1 GAP
inhibited Rac-dependent membrane ruffling, suggesting that its in vivo
substrate was Rac (99). The myr5 rat unconventional myosin
has a C-terminal domain with sequence similarity to Rho-GAP proteins
and is functional as a GAP protein against Cdc42p in vitro
(474). However, recent in vivo and in vitro studies suggest
that myr5 may be a specific RhoA-GAP (406). The PARG1
protein, which was identified by binding the PDZ domain of the PTPL1
protein tyrosine phosphatase, displayed in vitro GAP activity against
Cdc42p, Rac, and Rho, but it had greater efficacy against Rho
(506). Recently, CdGAP was identified in a yeast two-hybrid
protein screen with the Cdc42Y40C effector domain mutant
protein as the bait (292). The proline-rich Cd-GAP had in
vitro GAP activity against both Cdc42p and Rac1 but not RhoA, and
microinjection of Cd-GAP into Swiss 3T3 cells led to the inhibition of
Cdc42-dependent, bradykinin-induced filopodium formation as well as
Rac-dependent, PDGF-induced membrane ruffles, suggesting that Cd-GAP
can down-regulate both Cdc42p and Rac in vivo.
All these GAPs contain a ~140-amino-acid GAP homology domain, and
each contains additional structural motifs, including SH3 and SH2
domains, PH domains, DH domains, and proline-rich SH3 binding domains
(290) (Table 3). The recently
solved X-ray crystal structures of CDC42GAP/p50rhoGAP complexed
with Cdc42Hs or RhoA (484, 485) suggest that
CDC42GAP/p50rhoGAP interacts with GTPases predominantly
through their switch I and II regions. Interestingly, these structural
determinations indicate that CDC42GAP/p50rhoGAP and Ras-GAP have
very similar three-dimensional structures while having little
amino acid homology. For example, both have their catalytic Arg
residues (Arg fingers) in approximately the same position, thereby
stabilizing the GTPase in a transition state that promotes
GTP hydrolysis (50). These structural and functional similarities suggest that these GAPs may have derived from a common ancestor (31, 483) or may have arisen through convergent
evolution (50). Recently, the importance of the conserved
Arg305 and Arg306 residues in the catalytic
function of CDC42GAP/p50rhoGAP was genetically and biochemically
confirmed (309), reinforcing the X-ray crystal structure
predictions and supporting a mechanism of action in which the positive
charges of the Arg residues stabilize the negative charges that occur
upon the interactions between the catalytic Gln61 Cdc42
residue and the GTP
-
oxygens (309).
|
Guanine Nucleotide Dissociation Inhibitors
GDIs have a diverse set of in vitro functions including the ability to extract GTPases from membranes and the ability to inhibit guanine nucleotide exchange and GTPase activity, probably by sterically locking a GTPase in either a GDP- or GTP-bound state. The physiological roles for Cdc42-GDIs have not been examined in depth to date, but they will probably be shown to play a key role in regulating Cdc42p function through the cell cycle by altering its subcellular localization.
S. cerevisiae Rdi1p.
Rho-GDI was purified
from S. cerevisiae cytosolic fractions by assaying for an
activity that inhibited the dissociation of [3H]GDP from
bovine rhoA (373). Based on peptide sequences,
the Rho-GDI gene, RDI1, was isolated and it encoded a
~23-kDa polypeptide with 36% identity to human and bovine Rho-GDIs.
A GST-Rdi1 fusion protein was active on prenylated yeast Rho1p and
mammalian RhoA and Rac1 but not on nonprenylated Rho1p, suggesting that
Rdi1p interacts with Rho-like GTPases through the C-terminal
membrane localization domain. Disruption of Rdi1p did not lead to death or defects in mating, sporulation, heat shock sensitivity, or budding
pattern, suggesting that the protein is not essential for growth or
morphogenesis. However, overexpression of Rdi1p, as well as bovine
Rho-GDI, resulted in cell death. The morphological phenotypes
associated with this cell death have not been reported, but if Rdi1p
can extract Cdc42p from cellular membranes as mammalian Rho-GDI can,
one would predict that the phenotypes would resemble cdc42 loss-of-function phenotypes. Myc-tagged
Rdi1p coimmunoprecipitated with HA-tagged Rho1p and
Cdc42p (267), suggesting that Rdi1p could interact with both
GTPases within the cell. Rdi1p fractionated exclusively into
soluble fractions, and immunofluorescence microscopy with HA-tagged
Rdi1p indicated that Rdi1p was present in the cytosol. There was no
change in the fractionation pattern of overexpressed HA-Cdc42p in a
rdi1 mutant compared to the wild type, but overexpression of Rdi1p led to an increase in soluble Cdc42p (267).
However, it should be noted that in these experiments, HA-tagged Cdc42p was found predominantly in soluble fractions, which is opposite from
the predominant particulate fractionation pattern of endogenous Cdc42p
(643). It remains to be seen if Rdi1p displays GDI activity against Cdc42p as exhibited by mammalian Rho-GDI (see below).
Mammalian GDIs.
Three Cdc42-GDI proteins have been
identified to date in mammalian cells; they are currently designated
RhoGDI
(previously rhoGDI [for a review, see reference
549]), RhoGDI
(previously LD4, LyGDI, D4, or
D4/LyGDI [4, 306, 409, 459, 509]), and RhoGDI
(also
known as RhoGDI-3). The first Cdc42-GDI was purified from bovine brain
cytosol by its ability to inhibit the dissociation of labeled GDP from
Cdc42Hs (307); it effectively inhibited Dbl-catalyzed GDP
dissociation as well. Limited peptide sequence from this 28-kDa purified protein suggested that it was identical to the previously isolated 28-kDa Rho-GDI (160, 569), which was shown to act
as a GDI against Cdc42Hs (307) and to cosediment with
Cdc42Hs (471). Rho-GDI
mRNA and protein were
expressed in the brain, lungs, thymus, spleen, small intestines, and
kidney (160, 524), suggesting that Rho-GDI
was a
ubiquitous and promiscuous regulator of Rho-type GTPases. This GDI
activity required the isoprenylation of Cdc42Hs, in that unprenylated
Cdc42Hs isolated from E. coli was not responsive to the GDI
(208, 307) and addition of the prenylation inhibitor lovastatin altered the Cdc42Hs sedimentation profile toward a noncomplexed protein (471). Addition of purified bovine
brain Rho-GDI
to either human placental membranes or membranes from human epidermoid carcinoma (A431) cells containing Cdc42Hs resulted in
a significant dissociation of Cdc42Hs from the particulate pool into
the soluble pool, and this dissociation seemed to be insensitive to the
Cdc42Hs-bound guanine nucleotide (307), suggesting that the
GDI can interact with both GDP-bound and GTP-bound Cdc42Hs. A
GST-Rho-GDI
fusion protein could also efficiently extract RhoA and
Cdc42Hs, but not Rac1, from rat liver membranes (353). The Rho-GDI
, either native or as a GST fusion protein, also inhibited the intrinsic and GAP-stimulated GTPase activity of Cdc42Hs, and this GTPase inhibitory protein activity also required
isoprenylation of Cdc42Hs (208).
in most cell types were in the disruption of
actin-dependent structures and processes including cell motility and
cellular morphologies in Swiss 3T3 cells (395, 546) and
human keratinocytes (305), membrane ruffling in human KB cells (418), and cytoplasmic division in Xenopus
embryos (262). In addition, overexpression of Rho-GDI
in
C2C12 myoblasts inhibited differentiation into myotubes by affecting
the transcription of myogenin and other regulatory factors
(547). However, it should be noted that the role of
Cdc42Hs-Rho-GDI
interactions in mediating these effects is unknown.
By using N-methylanthraniloyl-GDP (Mant-GDP) and
fluorescence spectroscopy (308), it was shown that the
saturable binding of Rho-GDI
to Cdc42Hs induced a conformational
change resulting in quenching of the Mant-GDP fluorescence and that
deleting the last 8 amino acids of Rho-GDI
interfered with this
interaction (422) and resulted in a loss of GDI
activity (459). As mentioned above (see "Cdc42Hs
three-dimensional structure"), it seems likely that this
conformational change is within the Cdc42Hs Rho insert domain, thereby
leading to a stabilization of the guanine nucleotide-bound form. Recent
studies involving Mant-GDP fluorescence with Rho-GDI
deletion
mutants and Rho-GDI
NMR structure determinations indicated that the
C terminus of Rho-GDI
formed a
-sandwich structure whose open end
created a pocket for isoprene binding and that N-terminal residues 23 to 42 were necessary for the GDI inhibitory activity (175).
These data suggested that GDI function was mediated through the
cooperative action of C-terminal and N-terminal residues.
Rho-GDI
was identified predominantly in hematopoietic cells, and it
had ~67% identity to Rho-GDI
. The activity of Rho-GDI
toward
Cdc42Hs is ~10- to 20-fold weaker than that of Rho-GDI
(4,
459), which correlated with a ~15-fold-weaker interaction between Rho-GDI
and Cdc42Hs as assayed by Mant-GDP fluorescence (422). Also, Cdc42Hs did not cosediment with Rho-GDI
isolated from U937 hematopoietic cells (174), suggesting
that although Rho-GDI
may have in vitro GDI activity against
Cdc42Hs, it may not be a physiological GDI for Cdc42, a hypothesis
corroborated by the lack of significant mutant phenotypes associated
with the disruption of both copies of Rho-GDI
in embryonal stem
cells (182).
Human Rho-GDI
was isolated from a human brain cDNA library by
low-stringency DNA-DNA hybridization against Rho-GDI
and Rho-GDI
cDNA probes (5); a mouse homolog, termed Rho-GDI-3, was
identified in a two-hybrid protein screen with RhoB as bait
(620). The 52-kDa Rho-GDI
was ~50% identical to
Rho-GDI
and Rho-GDI
but contained a highly hydrophobic 30 amino
acid N-terminal domain not found in the other Rho-GDIs. Analysis of
mRNA levels indicated that Rho-GDI
was expressed predominantly in
the brain and pancreas. In GST affinity chromatography experiments,
Rho-GDI
interacted with RhoA and Cdc42Hs but not with Rac1 or Rac2.
Rho-GDI
displayed in vitro GDI activity against Cdc42Hs, but it was
~20-fold less potent than Rho-GDI
. The murine Rho-GDI-3 interacted
with, and had in vitro GDI activity against, RhoB and RhoG and was
expressed in the brain, lungs, kidneys, and testes (620).
Determination of the physiological roles for Cdc42-GDIs in the future
should provide valuable insights into Cdc42p function and subcellular localization.
CDC42P DOWNSTREAM EFFECTORS
|
|
|---|
Cdc42p can interact with a myriad of downstream effectors to regulate a diverse set of cellular functions. These effectors preferentially bind to GTP-bound Cdc42p and transduce the Cdc42p-dependent signals downstream to ultimately affect actin rearrangements, induction of transcription, and other cellular processes (see above). It should be noted that the mechanism(s) by which the interactions between Cdc42p and its effectors lead to this signal transduction is still unclear.
PAK-Like Kinases
S. cerevisiae PAK-like kinases. Ste20p, Cla4p, and Skm1p are the three members of the PAK family of serine/threonine protein kinases found in S. cerevisiae (for a review of PAKs, see reference 516). All three have a highly conserved protein kinase domain in their C termini as well as a CRIB domain in their N termini. Cla4p and Skm1p differ from Ste20p in that they contain a PH domain located N-terminal to the CRIB domain. There are clear instances of overlapping functions for these PAK-like kinases in regulating actin-dependent growth during the cell cycle, the pheromone response pathway, and filamentous growth. However, it remains to be determined whether these overlaps are physiologically relevant or are due to imposed artificial stresses uncovering biochemical redundancies.
(i) Ste20p.
Ste20p was identified in two different
genetic screens by its ability, when overexpressed on a multicopy
plasmid, to either suppress the sterility caused by overexpression of
the dominant negative ste4D62N mutant allele in
a
ste4 background (295) (Ste4 encodes the G
subunit of the pheromone response pathway
heterotrimeric G protein [596]) or induce the
transcriptional activation of a FUS1-lacZ fusion protein
independent of added pheromone (469). Disruption of the
Ste20p kinase domain resulted in cells with defects in mating,
pheromone sensitivity, transcriptional induction of mating-specific
genes, and induction of mating projections (295, 469), while
overexpression of N-terminal truncation mutants in which the CRIB
domain and other sequences, but not the kinase domain, were deleted,
caused death (298, 469). Epistasis experiments with mutant
alleles of other components of the pheromone response pathway indicated
that Ste20p functioned at or just below the level of the G protein but
above the Ste11p-Ste7p-Fus3p/Kss1p MAP kinase signaling module. Recent
data indicates that Ste20p interacts directly with the Ste4p
G
subunit and that this interaction is enhanced upon
pheromone addition (304). A small (14-amino-acid
[ANSSLAPLVKLARL]) domain
C-terminal to the kinase domain was necessary and sufficient for this
interaction, and mutating the underlined Ser and Pro residues led
to loss of this interaction. Interestingly, the Cla4p kinase (see
below) does not have this highly conserved domain and interacts weakly
with Ste4p, suggesting that these interactions play a role in the in vivo specificity of the PAKs.
ste20 and
cla4 mutants, which could be
reversed by adding GST-Ste20p, suggesting that both Ste20p and
Cla4p (see below) can mediate Cdc42p effects on the actin cytoskeleton.
Interestingly, the Cln1p-2p/Cdc28p G1 CDK complex
can phosphorylate Ste20p at the time that Ste20p is localized to the
sites of polarized growth at the bud tips, but this
phosphorylation does not seem to affect Ste20p kinase activity
(431, 601). However, the Cln2p-Cdc28p phosphorylation of
Ste20p does correlate with a repression of the pheromone response signaling pathway (431), suggesting that Ste20p
phosphorylation induces a switch between the mitotic cell cycle and
mating responses.
Characterization of in vitro and in vivo Ste20p kinase activity
indicated that Ste20p is a phosphoprotein that can undergo autophosphorylation that is necessary for its kinase activity and
depends on the K649 and T777 residues. Ste20p
can phosphorylate the Ste11p kinase in vitro, which is the next
downstream kinase in the pheromone response MAP kinase module, on Ser
and Thr residues (603). In addition, both Ste20p and Cla4p
can phosphorylate S357 of the head domain of the Myo3p
myosin I heavy-chain protein in S. cerevisiae
(602). This phosphorylation was deemed necessary for Myo3p
function because the S357A mutation resulted in a nonphosphorylated, nonfunctional protein and the S357D mutation, which would mimic the
phosphorylation state of S357, resulted in a functional protein. The
Myo3S357D mutant allele could not suppress the lethality or
morphological defects associated with the
ste20
cla4
double mutant or
cla4 single mutant (see below),
suggesting that Myo3 was not the sole physiologically important
substrate for Ste20p and Cla4p. Phosphorylation of the
Dictyostelium myosin I homolog led to actin-stimulated Mg2+-ATPase activity and motor activity (604);
it is unknown if Myo3p has similar functions in
S. cerevisiae. A myosin I heavy-chain kinase (MIHCK)
with sequence similarities to PAKs has been identified in
Dictyostelium (302) and Acanthamoeba
(57), and the Dictyostelium MIHCK contained a
CRIB domain and kinase domain, bound to GTP-Cdc42p and
GTP-Rac1p in overlay assays, and autophosphorylated in
the presence of GTP
S-Rac1p and GTP
S-Cdc42p
(301, 302). In addition, another Ste20-like kinase from
Dictyostelium has recently been shown to phosphorylate the
Ca2+-dependent actin fragmenting protein severin
(132).
By using two-hybrid protein assays, GST affinity chromatography
experiments, and immunoprecipitation experiments, it has been shown
that Ste20p preferentially interacted with Cdc42p-GTP in vitro and
in vivo (298, 456, 527). This interaction was between the
effector domain of Cdc42p and the CRIB domain of Ste20p, as evidenced
by the loss of binding seen with the Cdc42T35A
effector domain mutant protein (456) or the CRIB-deleted
Ste20p-
335-370 (456) or Ste20p-
334-369
(298), by the inability of the Cdc42T35A mutant
protein to suppress a ste20K649R dominant
negative mutant (456), and by the ability of wild-type Cdc42p and the GTP-bound Cdc42Q61L mutant protein, but
not the dominant negative Cdc42D118A mutant protein, to
suppress a ste20K649R dominant negative mutant
(456). Interestingly, the Cdc42V44A effector
domain mutant protein still interacted with Ste20p at comparable levels
to wild-type Cdc42p (475a), indicating that Ste20p interacts
with a subdomain of the effector domain. Further evidence for an in
vivo interaction between Cdc42p and Ste20p came from the examination of
a mutant strain containing the
cla4 and
ste20 mutations along with a
cla4-75ts allele (112, 298, 456).
This strain is inviable at 37°C but can be complemented by expressing
wild-type Ste20p on a plasmid; however, expression of a catalytically
inactive Ste20-K649R mutant allele or the CRIB-deleted
Ste20p-
335-370 mutant allele could not complement the defect
(456). Similar results were seen when CRIB-deleted
Ste20 mutant alleles were assayed for their ability to suppress a
cla4
ste20 double mutant that was viable upon GAL1-CLA4 expression but inviable on glucose media
(298). Deletion of STE20 or other downstream
components of the pheromone response pathway did not affect the ability
of activated Cdc42G12V mutant protein to cause death and
abnormal multibudded cells (9, 116), suggesting that Ste20p
did not mediate Cdc42G12Vp effects.
Binding of Cdc42p-GTP to Ste20p was not required for Ste20p kinase
activity in vitro (298, 456) (an effect of GTP-Cdc42 on Ste20p kinase activity has been reported [527]),
and deletion of the N-terminal regulatory domain including the CRIB
domain resulted in full and weakly constitutive catalytic activity
(456), suggesting that binding of Cdc42p-GTP to the
Ste20p N-terminal domain relieved a negative regulatory effect of this
domain on the kinase activity. The effects of Cdc42p binding to Ste20p
on the mating pathway were examined by analyzing the effects of the CRIB-deleted mutant Ste20p (298, 456). In both studies, it
was shown that deletion of the CRIB domain had little effect on the pheromone response pathway as assayed by mating efficiencies,
-factor halo assays, induction of a FUS1::lacZ
reporter gene, and generation of properly oriented, morphologically
normal mating projections. Interestingly, there were defects in
bilateral mating (i.e., mating between cells with the same
ste20 mutants) and in mating with far1-c mutants
that also display bilateral mating defects. These types of
bilateral-mating defects are thought to be the consequence of loss of
oriented mating projections toward the opposite mating partner, but
this was not shown to be the case with the ste20 mutants
(298). Instead, it appeared that these mutants had defects
in the cell-cell fusion event preceding zygote formation. Taken
together, these results suggest that Cdc42p-Ste20p interactions are not
necessary for induction of the pheromone response signaling pathway
(see "Mating pathway" under "Functional studies" above).
Cdc42p-Ste20p interactions are necessary for the generation of
pseudohyphae upon nitrogen starvation (298, 456, 488), and
these interactions are mediated through the S. cerevisiae
14-3-3 proteins Bmh1p and Bmh2p as well as components of the pheromone
response pathway (see "Pseudohyphal and invasive growth" above).
Wild-type Ste20p was localized to the sites of polarized
growth in emerging buds and in mating projections, while the
CRIB-deleted Ste20p showed a general cytoplasmic staining (298,
456), indicating that binding to Cdc42p is necessary for proper
localization of Ste20p to sites of polarized growth. In summary, loss
of Cdc42p binding does not dramatically alter the Ste20p kinase
activity or Ste20p function in the pheromone response pathway, which is probably mediated through interactions with the Ste4p
G
subunit (see above), but does affect Ste20p function
in filamentous growth and progression through the cell cycle. The
primary role for Cdc42p-Ste20p interactions may be in stabilizing
Ste20p in the proper subcellular location so that it can interact with
its downstream substrates.
(ii) Cla4p. Cla4p was originally identified in two genetic screens designed to identify mutants unable to survive in the absence of the two G1 cyclins Cln1p and Cln2p (39, 113). The cla4/erc10 cln1 cln2 triple mutants displayed abnormal morphologies, including elongated buds, wide mother-bud necks, and multinucleate cells, indicative of a delay in either the apical-isotropic bud growth switch and/or nuclear division and/or a cytokinesis defect. Another mutant allele identified in the screen was cla10, which was allelic to CDC12, a member of the septin family of proteins that comprise the 10-nm filaments laid down at the mother-bud neck region in late G1 post-START and are necessary for proper cytokinesis (see below). Cla4p showed significant sequence similarity to Ste20p within its kinase and CRIB domains, with the exception that Cla4p contained a PH domain in its N terminus (112). Deletion of the CRIB domain or the PH domain resulted in a nonfunctional or partially functional protein (38). Deletion of the Cla4p catalytic kinase domain did not result in death but did result in morphogenetic defects similar to the original cla4 mutant (112).
The Cla4p CRIB domain could bind to Cdc42p in [32P]GTP overlay assays, and full-length Cla4p interacted with Cdc42p in the yeast two-hybrid protein assay (112). The Cdc42V44A mutation interfered with Cdc42p-Cla4p interactions in the two-hybrid assay (475a), suggesting that Cla4p interacted with Cdc42p through the effector domain. Cla4p interacted more strongly with Cdc42G12Vp and did not interact with other S. cerevisiae Rho-type GTPases (112), indicating that Cla4p was a bona fide downstream effector of Cdc42. This conclusion was reinforced by the
cla4
cdc42-1ts and
cla4
cdc42V44A double-mutant synthetic lethality
(112, 475a) and the alteration of
Cdc42G12V-dependent abnormal cellular morphologies in a
cla4 background (116). While
cla4 and
ste20 single mutants did not die,
the
cla4
ste20 double mutant was inviable
(112), indicating that Cla4p and Ste20p have an overlapping
essential function. This essential function was not within the
pheromone response pathway or the protein kinase C pathway, as
evidenced by the inability of mutations within these pathways to
suppress cla4 mutants. Mutations in the HOG (for
"high-osmolarity glycerol") pathway (reviewed in references
26 and 574) exacerbated
cla4 mutant phenotypes and abolished the ability of high
Na+ concentrations to rescue a
cla4 mutant,
suggesting that there may be common functions between these pathways.
Interestingly, the morphological defects associated with the
cdc42V44A mutant allele could also be
remediated by high Na+ concentrations and by overexpression
of Cla4p (475a). A cla4-75ts
ste20
double mutant at restrictive temperatures displayed defects in cellular
morphologies (enlarged mother-bud necks) and septin ring assembly but
not in cortical actin localization (112), suggesting the
presence of other downstream effectors that could transduce the Cdc42p
signal to the actin cytoskeleton. However, recent data suggests that
both Ste20p and Cla4p can mediate Cdc42p effects on the actin
cytoskeleton (see the previous section).
Immunoprecipitated Cla4p had in vitro kinase activity against
the nonphysiological substrate myelin basic protein
(38) as well as the S. cerevisiae Myo3p myosin I
protein (602) (see above), although the physiological
relevance of this phosphorylation is not known. This kinase activity
was reduced three- to fourfold when the Cla4p was isolated from either
a cdc42-1 or cdc24-1 mutant background
(38), suggesting that functional GTP-bound Cdc42p is
needed to activate Cla4p kinase activity. Cla4p kinase activity was cell cycle regulated, with a peak of activity during
G2/M. This cyclical kinase activity depended on
binding of Cdc42p, because a CRIB-deleted Cla4p did not
show this cell cycle control and because expression of activated
Cdc42G12Vp, but not dominant negative
Cdc42D118Ap, resulted in a ~2.5-fold increase in
kinase activity. Activated Cdc42G12Vp along with the
mitotic cyclin Clb2p-Cdc28p kinase complex led to the
hyperphosphorylation of Cla4p and subsequent mitosis-specific and
septin-specific hyperphosphorylation of the Gin4p protein kinase
(14, 67, 333, 560), reinforcing a possible role for Cla4p
during mitosis or cytokinesis, although the in vitro Cla4p kinase
activity did not seem to be altered by its hyperphosphorylation. It
remains to be seen if Cdc42p is needed for the subcellular localization
of Cla4p, as it is for Ste20p (see above).
In addition to displaying synthetic lethality with cdc42
mutants, a cla4::LEU2 mutant was synthetic lethal
with a cdc12 septin mutant and septin ring localization was
defective in cla4 mutant cells (112). The
S. cerevisiae mitotic septins, products of the CDC3, CDC10, CDC11, and
CDC12 genes, belong to a family of eukaryotic proteins that
are involved in regulating cytokinesis and cellular morphogenesis (for
reviews, see references 78, 107, and
332). In S. cerevisiae, these proteins
are components of a 10-nm filament ring that is set down at the site of
bud emergence ~15 min prior to bud emergence (260) in an
actin-independent manner (21) and that persists at the
mother-bud neck region through cytokinesis. The function of the septins
is unclear, but recently they were shown to be necessary for the
localization of various components of the bud site selection machinery
(e.g., Bud4p) and the chitin biosynthesis/targeting machinery to the
bud emergence site (119, 505), for the mitosis-specific
phosphorylation of the Gin4p protein kinase (67, 333), and
for the assembly and maintenance of the contractile actomyosin ring
needed for cytokinesis (41). Taken together, these data
suggest that the primary role of Cla4p is in regulating cytokinesis
through interactions with Cdc42p and septins. The detailed analysis of
Cdc42p-Cla4p and Cla4p-septin interactions, as well as the
identification of physiological Cla4p phosphosubstrates, should greatly
enhance our understanding of the function of this key regulatory kinase.
(iii) Skm1p.
Skm1p was identified on chromosome
XV through the S. cerevisiae genome-sequencing project
(371). It exhibited higher sequence similarity to Cla4p than
to Ste20p, including the presence of a PH domain in its N
terminus. Skm1p showed weak interactions with Cdc42p in two-hybrid
protein assays, but it interacted more strongly with
Cdc42G12Vp (475a), indicating that it was a bona
fide downstream effector of Cdc42p. As with Ste20p, this interaction
was not affected by the Cdc42V44A effector domain mutation,
suggesting that Skm1p interacts with another subdomain of the Cdc42p
effector domain. Disruption of Skm1p did not cause death
(371), indicating that Skm1p does not play an essential role
in cell growth. Loss of Skm1p also did not show adverse effects on
cellular morphologies, bud site selection, growth on high-osmolarity
media, or mating, and did not show a synthetic lethal phenotype with a
cla4 or
ste20 mutant or mutations in
the CDC10 septin, the Rho-GAP BEM2 or
CDC42. Expression of Skm1p on a high-copy-number plasmid
could not suppress the
cla4 or
ste20 mutant
phenotype; overexpression under an inducible promoter was not tested.
However, overexpression of a GST-Skm1p fusion protein led to an
abnormal cellular morphology of large, round, multinucleate cells with
small, sometimes multiple, buds, suggesting that Skm1p may be
functioning in cellular morphogenesis. Deletion analysis indicated that
overexpression of the catalytic kinase domain was responsible for this
phenotype as well as for an ability to suppress
ste20
mating defects. Overexpression of the Skm1p catalytic domain also led
to severe growth defects similar to those seen with N-terminal
truncation mutants of Ste20p and Cla4p, reinforcing the notion that the
N-terminal domain of these PAK-like kinases containing the CRIB domain
plays a negative regulatory function on kinase activity that is
relieved by binding of Cdc42p. A detailed genetic analysis of
SKM1 is needed to pinpoint its cellular function.
S. pombe PAK-like kinases.
There are two
known PAK homologs in S. pombe, Pak1p/Shk1p (364,
447) and Pak2p/Shk2p (515, 616). The
pak1+ (447) and
shk1+ (364) gene product was isolated
in two independent screens by degenerate oligonucleotide PCR based on
S. cerevisiae Ste20 sequences; pak2+
was isolated in a cDNA library screen with the pak1 PCR
product (447). The
pak1+/shk1+ gene encoded a 72-kDa
protein with significant amino acid identity to the PAK family,
especially within the kinase domain and the N-terminal CRIB domain, and
was shown to have in vitro autophosphorylation activity predominantly
on Ser residues (447). Analysis of
pak1/shk1 mutants indicated that Pak1p/Shk1p was essential for cell growth, with mutant cells exhibiting a small, round cellular phenotype reminiscent of cdc42 null mutants (390).
Pak1p/Shk1p preferentially interacted with GTP-Cdc42p in GST
affinity chromatography experiments and with the Cdc42G12V
activated allele in two-hybrid protein assays (447). This
interaction was abolished with the T35A effector domain mutation
(447) and was not seen with the Cdc42T17N
dominant negative allele (364, 447), suggesting that
Pak1p/Shk1p is a bona fide downstream effector of Cdc42p. This point
was corroborated by the observations that co-overexpression of mutant
alleles of cdc42 and pak1 led to lethal
growth and morphology defects (447) and that overexpression
of wild-type Pak1p or a kinase-defective K415,416R mutant protein
(447) or a C-terminal truncation mutant protein that still
contained the CRIB domain (364) resulted in cells with
abnormal morphologies and delocalized cortical actin structures. Both
Pak1p/Shk1p and Cdc42p also functioned in the mating pathway, as
evidenced by the reduced mating in the
cdc42T17N dominant negative
mutant and the pak1K415,416R
kinase-defective mutant (364, 447), by the ability of
Pak1p/Shk1p to partially suppress the
cdc42T17N mating defect (364) and
the S. cerevisiae ste20 mating defect (447), and
by the ability of a Pak1p/Shk1p N-terminal deletion mutant protein to
activate the S. cerevisiae pheromone response pathway
(364) and to interfere with two-hybrid protein interactions between the S. pombe Byr1 and Byr2 protein kinases involved
in Ras-mediated pheromone response (568).
pak2/shk2 mutants did not display any morphological or
mating defects. However, overexpression of Pak2p/Shk2p led to
morphological defects and could suppress the morphological and mating
defects associated with
pak1 mutants, and this
suppression required the Pak2p/Shk2p PH and CRIB domains. In
addition, co-overexpression of Pak2p/Shk2p and Cdc42p led to cell death
and aberrant cellular morphologies. Overexpression of Pak2p/Shk2p
in S. cerevisiae could not suppress the mating defects
associated with
ste20 mutants or the morphological defects associated with
cla4 single or
cla4
ste20 double mutants; effects on Skm1p function were not analyzed.
Therefore, it is likely that Pak2p/Shk2p is a downstream effector of
Cdc42p in S. pombe, but its function in the polarity
pathway is yet unknown.
In a two-hybrid protein screen with Pak1p/Shk1p as bait, a new protein
kinase termed Skb1p was identified (166). Skb1p interacted with Pak1p/Shk1p, Pak2p/Shk2p (616), and itself but did not
interact with Cdc42p, Scd1p, Scd2p, Ste20p, Ras1p, or mammalian
p65PAK. The interaction with Pak1p/Shk1p was through a
domain adjacent to the Pak1p/Shk1p CRIB domain and the N-terminal 72 amino acids of Skb1p. Deletion of skb1 did not result in
death or mating defects but did result in a slightly slower growth and
a mild shortened-cell morphological phenotype that was suppressed by
overexpression of Pak1p/Shk1p. Overexpression of Skb1p resulted in
hyperelongated cells and, together with overexpression of Pak1p/Shk1p,
resulted in suppression of a ras1 mutant morphology.
These data are consistent with Skb1p acting as a positive effector of
Pak1p/Shk1p function. Recently, a 72-kDa mammalian homolog of Skb1p,
termed IBP72, which was 52% similar in predicted amino acid
sequence to Skb1p, was shown to interact in vitro and in two-hybrid
protein assays with pICln, a protein involved in the regulation of a
nucleotide-sensitive chloride current (279). Interestingly,
mammalian Cdc42p also has been implicated in ion homeostasis through
G-protein coupled Na+-K+ exchange
(222) (see "Mammals" under "Functional studies" above).
A new S. pombe Ser/Thr protein kinase, termed Orb6p, was
recently implicated in acting downstream of Pak1p/Shk1p in
controlling cell polarity (575, 576). Orb6p shows
significant amino acid similarity to the mammalian Rho-associated
kinase and the myotonic dystrophy kinase DMPK (see below), and
orb6ts mutants display defects in polarized cell
growth and actin organization. The possibility that Orb6p acts
downstream of Pak1p/Shk1p was deduced from the observations that
orb6 mutants displayed synthetic lethality with
pak1/shk1/orb2ts mutants and that overexpression
of Orb6p suppressed the pak1/shk1/orb2ts mutant
morphology defects. A physical interaction between Pak1p/Shk1p and Orb6p has not been reported to date.
Drosophila and C. elegans PAK-like kinases. The Drosophila PAK homolog (DPAK) was identified by low-stringency DNA-DNA hybridization from an embryonic cDNA library (199). The 76-kDa DPAK contained a highly conserved CRIB domain as well as a Ser/Thr kinase domain. A GST fusion to the DPAK N-terminal CRIB domain bound to Drosophila RacA (DRacA) and Cdc42p (Dcdc42) and human Rac1 and Cdc42p (data not shown) in an overlay assay (199). DPAK mRNA and protein were localized ubiquitously throughout embryonic development, with elevated localization in epidermal cells associated with the dorsal vessel and muscle attachment sites as well as the central nervous system. DPAK colocalized with antiphosphotyrosine antibodies to focal adhesions and focal complexes, and with F-actin caps in the syncytial blastoderm and the leading edge of epidermal cells during dorsal closure over the amnioserosa, a process that is inhibited by expression of a dominant negative DRacA transgene (198). Therefore, it is unclear whether DPAK is a physiological Cdc42 effector.
Another potential downstream effector of Drosophila Cdc42p, the Gek protein kinase, was identified in a two-hybrid protein screen for proteins that interacted with the Dcdc42V12 mutant protein (338). Gek also bound to GST-Dcdc42V12 in GST affinity chromatography experiments, and this interaction was abolished by the Dcdc42T35A effector domain mutation and by the Gek
ISP mutation within the Gek CRIB domain, suggesting that binding
occurs between the Cdc42p effector domain and the Gek CRIB domain. The 1,613-amino-acid Gek protein contained an N-terminal Ser/Thr kinase domain, and immunoprecipitated myc-tagged Gek had histone kinase activity, which was lost when the catalytic Lys residue at position 105 was mutated to Ala. The Gek protein also contained an N-terminal coiled-coil domain, a Cys-rich domain similar to phorbol ester binding
domains, a PH domain, and the C-terminal CRIB domain. The Gek
kinase domain displayed 63% amino acid identity to the kinase domain
of the human myotonic dystrophy protein kinase (DMPK) and 49% identity
to the kinase domain of Rho-kinase, although DMPK and Rho kinase do not
contain a Cdc42-interacting CRIB domain and are probably not Cdc42p
effectors. Generation and characterization of P-element-directed
gek deletion mutants suggested that Gek was essential for
proper oogenesis and that cortical F-actin assembly around nurse cells
required functional Gek. Defects in cortical F-actin assembly seen in
gek mutants were similar to those seen with expression of
activated cdc42G12V mutant allele
(408) (see "Drosophila" under "Functional
studies" above), suggesting that Gek may be a bona fide Cdc42p
downstream effector.
The gene encoding the C. elegans PAK homolog,
CePAK, was identified by degenerate PCR, isolated from an embryonic
cDNA library, and mapped to chromosome X (87). The 64-kDa
CePAK contained a N-terminal CRIB domain and a C-terminal Ser/Thr
kinase domain and exhibited ~52% similarity to DPAK and rat
-PAK.
GST-CePAK bound in vitro to GTP-CeRac1 and GTP-Cdc42Ce, but
not to the GDP-bound proteins, in filter-binding assays.
Immunoprecipitated CePAK displayed weak autophosphorylation activity in
the presence of GTP-Cdc42Ce and was found in both soluble and
particulate fractions. The levels of CePAK mRNA normalized to actin
mRNA levels were highest during embryogenesis and subsequently
decreased during larval development. By using anti-CePAK antibodies,
the protein was localized to hypodermal cell boundaries during
embryonic body elongation and colocalized with Cdc42Ce at these
boundaries, suggesting that both proteins function in the
actin-dependent elongation of embryonic cell bodies. Recently,
CePAK-
-galactosidase and CePAK-GFP fusion proteins were shown to
localize to the cell surface of pharyngeal muscle cells as well as
motor neurons and distal tip cells (231). Whether CePAK
transduces Cdc42p signals in vivo is unknown.
Mammalian PAK-like kinases.
Mammalian PAKs act in
response to a variety of intracellular and extracellular signals to
mediate a number of different cellular events including growth factor-
and stress-induced actin rearrangements and activation of the JNK/SAPK
and p38 MAP kinase pathways (see below) (see "Mammals" under
"Functional studies" above), Nef- and Nef-associated
kinase-dependent HIV-1 replication and
pathogenesis (111, 335, 508, 564), thrombin
cleavage in platelets (554), cleavage arrest in frog
embryos (492), Schwann cell transformation (551),
CD28-dependent antigen-specific activation of T cells (248,
249), and T-cell receptor-mediated activation of the nuclear factor of activated T cells transcription factor (609). The
original mammalian PAK, designated p65PAK, was identified
as a rat brain protein that interacted with
[
-32P]GTP-GST-Cdc42 and
[
-32P]GTP-GST-Rac1, but not with
[
-32P]GTP-GST-RhoA, in an overlay assay
(359). This interaction was specific for the GTP-bound
form of Cdc42p, suggesting that p65PAK could function
as a downstream effector of Cdc42p function. Purified p65PAK displayed Ser/Thr autophosphorylation activity that
was stimulated by GTP-bound Cdc42p and Rac1p and had kinase
activity against the exogenous myelin basic protein substrate.
Currently, there are three major 62- to 68-kDa PAK isoforms in
mammalian tissues, designated (in the nomenclature of Sells and
Chernoff [561]) PAK1 (previously p65PAK,
PAK, and hPAK-1 [24, 55, 104, 265, 359]), which is
found predominantly in brain, muscle and spleen tissue; PAK2
(previously
-PAK, PAKI, and hPAK65 [235, 265, 492,
554]), which is ubiquitous; and PAK3 (previously PAK
and
mPAK-3 [24, 355]), which is found in brain tissue
(for reviews, see references 264 and
516 and references therein). These three isoforms
all contain several N-terminal proline-rich domains followed by a CRIB
domain that interacts with GTP-bound Cdc42p through its effector
domain and a C-terminal Ser/Thr protein kinase domain, whose activity
is stimulated by binding of Cdc42p and Rac to the CRIB domain. Although it was believed that the CRIB domain played a role in autoinhibition of
PAK activity, recent data suggest that a highly conserved domain C-terminal to the CRIB domain functions in this capacity
(151). The PAK N-terminal proline-rich domains can interact
with SH3 domains within the Nck adapter protein (47, 161, 263,
334, 468, 517, 542), thereby forming a linkage between growth
factor receptors and activation of the PAKs. Interestingly, another
Cdc42p effector, the Wiskott-Aldrich syndrome protein (WASP), also
interacts with Nck through its SH3 domains (486) (see
"Wiskott-Aldrich syndrome proteins mediate actin rearrangements" below).
ACK tyrosine kinases. Two tyrosine protein kinases, enriched in mammalian brain and skeletal muscle tissue, have been identified as specific effectors of Cdc42p. These tyrosine kinases, designated ACK-1 (358) and ACK-2 (617), specifically interact with GTP-bound Cdc42p in vitro and in vivo and contain a CRIB domain along with a tyrosine kinase catalytic domain, an SH3 domain, and a proline-rich domain. The function of ACK-1 is unknown, but incubation of ACK-2-transfected, detached (not adherent) COS7 cells with EGF or bradykinin resulted in an increase in ACK-2 phosphorylation, suggesting that ACKs may link serpentine/G-protein-coupled receptors to Cdc42p signaling pathways.
Bni1p and Bnr1p Formins May Function as Scaffold Proteins
Bni1p (139, 232, 236, 269, 619) is a ~220-kDa protein that can interact with Rho-type GTPases in S. cerevisiae. It contains four functional domains including a N-terminal Cdc42/Rho interaction domain contained within amino acids 90 to 343; a proline-rich formin homology 1 (FH1) domain (amino acids 1230 to 1330) found in a number of formin family members including the S. pombe genes fus1 (457) and cdc12 (74), Drosophila genes diaphanous (68) and cappuccino (134), the Aspergillus nidulans gene figA/speA (203, 365), and vertebrate formins (342, 566, 585, 600); a formin homology 2 (FH2) domain (amino acids 1516 to 1616); and a C-terminal Bud6p/Aip3p binding domain (within amino acids 1647 to 1953). It should be noted that the only other formin-like protein that has been shown to interact with Rho-type GTPases is murine p140mDia (585), a homolog of Drosophila diaphanous that specifically interacted with GTP-bound RhoA (in vitro interactions with Cdc42p have recently been reported [10]), localized to spreading lamellae and cleavage furrows in Swiss 3T3 cells, and colocalized with RhoA and profilin (see below) in membrane ruffles in HT1080 human fibrosarcoma cells. However, several other formin-like proteins have been implicated in cell polarity processes in their respective organisms.
Bni1p interacted with Cdc42p in two-hybrid protein assays, and this
interaction was specific for GTP-bound Cdc42G12Vp and
not GDP-bound Cdc42D118Ap (139). This
interaction was substantiated by the in vitro binding of an HA-tagged
fragment of Bni1p (amino acids 1 to 1214) purified from
S. cerevisiae on Sepharose beads to GTP
S-bound, but
not GDP-bound or nucleotide-free, Cdc42p. Bni1p was also identified by
a two-hybrid protein interaction with the activated
Rho1Q68L mutant protein (269). This interaction
was between Rho1Q68Lp and amino acids 90 to 489 of Bni1p,
and deletion analysis indicated that amino acids 90 to 343 were capable
of interacting with Rho1Q68Lp. The two-hybrid interaction
was abolished by the Rho1T42A effector domain mutation,
suggesting that Bni1p was a downstream effector of Rho1, but a maltose
binding protein fusion to amino acid 1 to 524 of Bni1p could bind
nonspecifically in vitro to both GDP-bound and GTP
S-bound Rho1p.
Bni1p may also interact with Rho3p and Rho4p (unpublished results cited
in reference 139), suggesting that Bni1p may be a
general effector of Rho-like GTPases in S. cerevisiae.
In two-hybrid protein assays, GST affinity chromatography experiments,
and a maltose binding protein tag overlay assay, Bni1p also interacted
with the S. cerevisiae Pfy1p profilin, and this interaction
occurred through the Bni1p FH1 domain (139, 232). This
binding was also substantiated by a loss of interaction with a profilin
mutant protein, Pfy1p-3, that had defects in polyproline binding but
not actin binding (139). Several C-terminal fragments of the
actin-binding protein Bud6p/Aip3p (15), as well as the Act1p
actin protein, displayed two-hybrid protein interactions with Bni1p
(139). Bni1p-Bud6p two-hybrid protein interactions occurred
through the C-terminal ~300 amino acids of Bni1p, and interactions
with actin occurred through the FH1 domain; these interactions may be
mediated through Bni1p interactions with profilin (see above). Bni1p
can also interact with elongation factor 1
(EF1
), a protein that
has actin binding activity, through a domain between the FH1 and FH2
domains, and the binding of Bni1p to EF1
led to a loss of
EF1
-actin binding (570). Bni1p also interacts with the
SH3 domain of the Myo3p myosin as assayed by two-hybrid protein assays
and GST affinity chromatography (48a). Interestingly, the
SH3 domains of the Myo3p and Myo5p myosins also bind to the proline-rich protein verprolin (Vrp1p) (16), which has
previously been implicated in cell polarity (571). Bni1p
displays genetic and physical interactions with Spa2p, a protein of
unknown function that localizes to regions of polarized growth, and
localization of Bni1p to the tips of enlarging buds requires the
presence of Spa2p and the N-terminal Cdc42/Rho interaction domain
(157), suggesting that Bni1p is tethered to the plasma
membrane through binding to either a Rho-type GTPase or Spa2p or
both. Recent results indicate that Spa2p can interact with Bud6p as
well as components of several MAP kinase cascades and the Pea2 cell
polarity protein (523), suggesting that actin,
profilin, verprolin, Myo3 and Myo5 myosins, Bni1p, Spa2p, Bud6p,
EF1
, Pea2p, and possibly other actin binding proteins may form a
multiprotein complex with Cdc42p during the bud emergence process (Fig.
3).
BNI1 was identified in a screen for mutants that exhibited a randomization of bud site selection in cells exhibiting a bipolar budding pattern (619). A bni1 disruption mutant, in which amino acids 1228 to 1414 containing the FH1 domain were replaced, grew poorly at high temperatures (269); whether this was a true null mutant is unclear, given that the Cdc42/Rho interaction domain would be predicted to still be expressed in this truncated Bni1p. In addition, a transposon insertion mutation in BNI1 led to a defect in filamentous growth (404), suggesting that Bni1p may either mediate actin rearrangements during pseudohyphal growth or be required for the bipolar budding pattern necessary for pseudohyphal formation. Genetic evidence for a role of Bni1p in Rho1p function came from synthetic lethal phenotypes observed between this bni1 disruption mutant and a mutant expressing mammalian RhoA in place of S. cerevisiae Rho1p and between a pkc1 mutant defective in protein kinase C (269), a known downstream effector of Rho1p (251, 423). BNI1 was also shown to be allelic to SHE5, mutants of which are defective in transcriptional expression from the HO endonuclease promoter in mother cells (236); another mutant identified in this screen, she1, was found to be in the MYO4 gene, a class V type minimyosin (188). An HA-epitope-tagged Bni1p localized to the tips of mating projections in pheromone-arrested cells (139), which correlated with the isolation of bni1 mutants in a screen for mutants defective in mating (139). This defect was due to an inability to form pheromone-induced mating projections in bni1 mutants, which was a consequence of a depolarized cortical actin cytoskeleton. This phenotype could not be suppressed by a Bni1 mutant protein lacking its FH1 domain (unpublished results cited in reference 139), reinforcing the role of the FH1 domain in actin interactions.
Overexpression of full-length Bni1p had no phenotypic effect, but
overexpression of the Bni1
N N-terminal truncation protein, which was
missing amino acids 1 to 451 containing the Cdc42/Rho interaction
domain, resulted in cell death and a dominant negative phenotype of
large, round, unbudded cells with a delocalized cortical actin
cytoskeleton and an increased number of cortical actin patches and
actin cables (139). This result suggested either that
the essential polarization of cortical actin to the site of bud
emergence was dependent on Cdc42p binding to Bni1p or that
overexpression of the C-terminal portion of Bni1p could lead to
the nonproductive sequestration of actin or actin-binding proteins. The
striking appearance of cortical actin structures around the periphery
of these cells suggested that plasma membrane localization of cortical actin, albeit nonpolarized, may be possible in the absence of Cdc42p
binding to Bni1p; it would be very interesting to determine if the
Bni1
N truncation protein localizes to the plasma membrane and is
capable of cross-linking actin in the absence of Cdc42p. The Bni1
Np
dominant negative phenotype could be suppressed by overexpression of
Pfy1p profilin and the two tropomyosins Tpm1p and Tpm2p, suggesting
that loss of Cdc42p-Bni1p binding resulted in a Bni1p that can
sequester Pfy1p profilin or other actin binding proteins in a
nonfunctional manner. Interestingly, overexpression of Pfy1p profilin
inhibited the growth of a bni1 disruption mutant (232). Although the cellular morphologies and actin
localization patterns associated with this profilin-based inhibition of
growth were not reported, this result suggests that the
interactions between these two proteins is important for their functions.
A sequence homology search of the S. cerevisiae genome
database revealed the presence of a protein, designated Bnr1p, with significant amino acid sequence homology to Bni1p (232). The smaller (1,374-amino-acid) Bnr1p exhibited 19% identity in the Cdc42/Rho interaction domain, 44% identity in the FH1 domain, and 35%
identity in the FH2 domain of Bni1p. Bnr1p also interacted with the
Pfy1p profilin protein in two-hybrid protein assays, and this
interaction also occurred through the Bnr1p FH1 domain. While a
bnr1 disruption mutant was viable at all temperatures tested, a bni1 bnr1 double mutant displayed a ts
growth defect at 33°C and an arrested phenotype of large, round,
unbudded, multinucleate cells with delocalized actin and chitin, highly
reminiscent of cdc42 loss-of-function alleles.
Interestingly, bud site selection is randomized in haploid
bnr1 mutants but not diploids, which is the opposite of the
diploid bud site selection defects in a bni1 mutant
(619). Also, a bni1 bnr1 double mutant was
sensitive to growth on 1 M sorbitol (232), as were
pfy1 (187) and certain act1
(424) mutants, suggesting that these proteins function in osmoregulation. In two-hybrid protein assays, Bnr1p interacted only
with wild-type and activated (Q70L mutant) Rho4p but not with Rho1p,
Rho2p, Rho3p, or Cdc42p, and maltose binding protein-tagged Bnr1p
containing the Rho interaction domain of amino acids 63 to 421 bound in vitro to GTP
S-Rho4p but not GDP-Rho4p
(232). In addition, Bnr1p and Bni1p interacted with the SH3
domain-containing protein Hof1p, which displayed sequence similarity to
the S. pombe Cdc15 protein involved in cytokinesis, and
HA-tagged Bnr1p and Hof1p localized to the mother-bud neck region
(252). Taken together, these data suggest that Bni1p and
possibly Bnr1p can act as scaffold proteins juxtaposing Cdc42p and
other Rho-like GTPases with actin and actin binding proteins during
bud emergence and possibly cytokinesis, thus serving as a critical link
between the Cdc42p-dependent signal transduction machinery and its
ultimate target, the cortical actin cytoskeleton (Fig. 3).
IQGAPs as Scaffold Proteins Mediating Cdc42p-Actin Interactions
S. cerevisiae Iqg1p/Cyk1p functions during
cytokinesis.
Mammalian IQGAP proteins are
potential scaffold proteins that interact with Cdc42p, actin, and
calmodulin (see below). In S. cerevisiae, a potential
IQGAP termed Iqg1p (135, 446) or Cyk1p (328)
was identified in three independent studies. Iqg1p/Cyk1p is
a ~165-kDa protein that contains several, but not all, of the structural motifs found in mammalian IQGAPs, including an
N-terminal calponin homology (CH) domain predicted to interact with
actin, four or eight IQ domains predicted to interact with
calmodulin, a coiled-coil domain that may function in the dimerization
of IQGAPs, and a C-terminal GAP homology domain (GRD) predicted to interact with Cdc42p. In two-hybrid protein assays, Iqg1p
preferentially interacted with activated (GTP-bound)
Cdc42G12Vp, suggesting that it is a downstream effector
(446). Iqg1p/Cyk1p coimmunoprecipitated with actin from
S. cerevisiae cell lysates (446) and
cosedimented with polymerized rabbit skeletal muscle actin; this
cosedimentation was dependent on the Iqg1p/Cyk1p CH domain
(135). While Iqg1p/Cyk1p has not been shown to interact with
calmodulin as do mammalian IQGAPs (see below), calmodulin is
delocalized in a
iqg1 strain (446).
iqg1ts strain revealed a more heterogeneous
population of cellular morphologies at the restrictive temperature,
including large, round cells indicative of a G1 block
(446). Functional epitope-tagged Iqg1p/Cyk1p was observed at the presumptive site of bud emergence in unbudded cells
(446) and in a ring structure at the mother-bud neck region (135, 328, 446), which colocalized with the septin, actin, and Myo1p rings present at the mother-bud neck region (Fig. 3B). It
also occasionally appeared as a double-ring structure or as a dot in
the middle of the mother-bud neck region (328); this dot
colocalized to a Myo1p dot structure that appeared to be the result of
the constriction of the actomyosin ring during cytokinesis. This
localization was not dependent on the localization of the actin ring,
as evidenced by the persistence of the Iqg1p/Cyk1p ring after treatment
with the actin-depolymerizing drug latrunculin-A (135), and
the organization of cortical actin at sites of polarized growth and at
the septum region did not seem to be disrupted in
iqg1
cells, suggesting that the localizations of Iqg1p/Cyk1p and actin are
independent of each other. Cell cycle synchronization experiments
suggested that these Iqg1p/Cyk1p ring structures assembled predominantly after the elongation of the mitotic spindle in anaphase and disassembled after anaphase completion (328). Given the
localization of both Iqg1p/Cyk1p and Cdc42p, along with the septin,
actin, and Myo1 rings, to the mother-bud neck region, it is
likely that Iqg1p/Cyk1p functions to mediate Cdc42p interactions
with the actomyosin ring during cytokinesis, possibly as a scaffold
protein serving to nucleate various essential components of the
actomyosin ring (Fig. 3). Interestingly, a Dictyostelium
IQGAP has recently been identified, and mutations of this protein
cause cytokinesis defects (1), suggesting that IQGAPs
have a common function in cytokinesis (see below).
Mammalian IQGAPs mediate Cdc42p-calmodulin-actin
interactions.
There are two identified mammalian IQGAPs,
designated IQGAP1 and IQGAP2. Human IQGAP1 was
originally identified serendipitously in a PCR-based search for
matrix metalloproteinase family members (588). IQGAP1
was also identified from COS cell lysates by its ability to interact
with GTP
S-GST-Cdc42 on agarose beads (204). This
~195-kDa protein contains a GRD (residues 997 to 1270) with significant similarity to the catalytic domain of Ras-GAP proteins, as
well as a CH domain (residues 48 to 161), which is believed to interact
with actin, and four tandemly repeated IQ domain (residues 745 to
865), which are present in a number of proteins that interact with
calmodulin. IQGAP1 also contains a single WW domain implicated in
protein-protein interactions and six copies of a unique 50- to
60-amino-acid domain with no known matches in the database. The human
IQGAP1 gene mapped to chromosome 15p-15q1.1, and RNA blot analysis indicated that IQGAP1 was highly expressed in the placenta, lungs, kidneys, and skeletal muscle but was absent from the brain. A GST-IQGAP1-GRD fusion protein or an in
vitro-translated C-terminal IQGAP1 domain polypeptide did not
exhibit GAP activity against Ras, Rho, or Cdc42Hs (204,
588), and affinity-purified IQGAP1 did not display GAP
activity against Ras, RalA, Cdc42Hs, Rac1, or RhoA (reference
283 and data not shown), suggesting that
IQGAPs do not have catalytic GAP activity. Interestingly, expression of the IQGAP1 C-terminal domain peptide in
S. cerevisiae resulted in a dominant negative
loss-of-polarity phenotype that could be suppressed by
overexpression of wild-type S. cerevisiae Cdc42p
(204), suggesting that this C-terminal domain could interact with Cdc42p in vivo (see below).
S on columns. Both proteins could also interact with
Rac1 but not RhoA or Ha-Ras. The binding of IQGAP1 p180 and
IQGAP2 p175 to Cdc42Hs could not be competed with a functional
Cdc42-GAP polypeptide, but it could be competed with the
mPAK-3 CRIB domain, suggesting that the IQGAPs bind to Cdc42p
through its effector domain. Neither IQGAP1 or IQGAP2
contain a CRIB domain, and their interactions with Cdc42Hs are mediated
through the C-terminal GRD (204, 283, 379). IQGAP1 binding to Cdc42Hs seemed to stabilize the GTP-bound state of the protein and inhibited its intrinsic GTPase activity
(379), suggesting that it acts as a GTPase
inhibitor similar to rho-GDI. Interestingly, when an in vitro
MESG/phosphorylase-coupled assay was used to measure
Pi
release from Cdc42-GTP, it was shown that the IQGAP GRD domain
had a ~10-fold higher affinity toward Cdc42-GTP than did the CRIB
domains of PAK1 and WASP (624). IQGAP1 was coimmunoprecipitated with HA-tagged Cdc42G12V protein from
COS and Rat1 cells (204) and was also the major protein
coimmunoprecipitated with HA-tagged Cdc42Q61L protein from
COS7 cells (136), and this association was slightly enhanced
after treatment with EGF, indicating that IQGAP1 is a likely
physiological Cdc42p effector. Recently, both IQGAP1 and IQGAP2 (see below) were shown to coimmunoprecipitate with Cdc42p from rabbit liver and Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) Golgi
membrane-enriched fractions (378), suggesting that
IQGAPs may play a role in Cdc42p-dependent membrane trafficking
events (see "Prenylation and subcellular localization" above).
IQGAP1 was also identified by nanoelectrospray tandem mass
spectrometry from normal (Hs578Bst) and malignant (MCF-7) human breast
cell lines by its ability to bind to a calmodulin-Sepharose column in
the presence and absence of Ca2+ (243). Although
IQGAP1 could bind calmodulin in both the absence and presence of
Ca2+ (204, 243), binding was enhanced
~twofold in the presence of Ca2+ (243).
Immunoprecipitation with anti-IQGAP1 antibodies brought down
calmodulin from NIH 3T3 cells (204), and
immunoprecipitation with anti-calmodulin antibodies brought down
IQGAP1 from MCF-7 cells (243). Binding
of IQGAP1 to calmodulin occurred through the IQ motifs in
the N terminus of IQGAP1 (204). In GST affinity chromatography experiments, it was shown that calmodulin could inhibit
the binding of IQGAP1 to Cdc42Hs in a Ca2+- and
dose-dependent manner, but this inhibition was not observed when
IQGAP1 was already bound to Cdc42Hs (243).
IQGAP1 was also identified from bovine adrenal cytosol by its
ability to cosediment with rabbit muscle actin microfilaments (30), and actin from bovine brain cytosol could bind to
GST-IQGAP1 columns (158). IQGAP1 copurified with
substoichiometric amounts of calmodulin and was found as a dimer
in sedimentation equilibrium experiments (30) and as
oligomers in gel filtration experiments, with addition of
GTP
S-GST-Cdc42Hs enhancing the oligomerization (158). The presence of calmodulin, with or without
Ca2+, interfered with the cosedimentation of IQGAP1
with actin microfilaments. IQGAP1 could cross-link F-actin,
as evidenced by increases in the viscosity of microfilament networks in
the presence of IQGAP1 (30, 158) and by the appearance
of actin bundles in negative-stain electron microscopy (30),
and this cross-linking was enhanced in the presence of
GTP
S-GST-Cdc42Hs (158). In addition, both IQGAP1 and actin were found in an immunoprecipitation complex with
HA-tagged Cdc42Hs (136). IQGAP1 colocalized to
rhodamine-phalloidin-stained cortical actin in insulin-induced membrane
ruffles in KB cells, and this localization was inhibited by prior
treatment of the cells with dominant negative Rac1T17N or
Cdc42T17N (283). IQGAP1 also localized to
lamellipodia and membrane ruffles, but not stress fibers, in
monkey kidney, rat kidney, and NIH 3T3 cells (30) and PAE
endothelial cells (204) and co-localized with transfected
Cdc42Q61Lp in COS7 cells (136). Recently,
IQGAP1 was localized to cell-cell junctions in MDCK cells
(283) and was shown to colocalize and interact with
E-cadherin and
-catenin at sites of cell-cell contact in mouse L
fibroblasts (284), suggesting that IQGAP1 may mediate Cdc42p effects on cell-cell adhesion (see "Mammals" under
"Functional studies" above). Given the recent localization of
IQGAP1 to a perinuclear fraction coincident with Golgi markers
(378) (see above), it appears that there are different
subcellular pools of IQGAPs that can interface with Cdc42p and
actin to mediate multiple cellular events.
IQGAP2 was identified from a mouse brain library by
screening with an IQGAP1 probe at low stringency (51).
The human IQGAP2 gene mapped to chromosome 5q1.1-1.3,
and RNA blot analysis indicated that IQGAP2 was expressed
predominantly in the liver and in several hepatoblastoma cell lines.
Human IQGAP2 was isolated from a human cDNA
library and found to encode a ~180-kDa protein with 62%
identity to IQGAP1 over its entire length and containing all of the
structural motifs found in IQGAP1 (see above). As with IQGAP1,
IQGAP2 binds calmodulin, as determined by coimmunoprecipitation
with HA-tagged IQGAP2, and the IQ domains were necessary for
this binding. It preferentially interacted with GTP-bound Cdc42Hs
and to a lesser extent with Rac1 in GST affinity chromatography
experiments and immunoprecipitations from human liver cell lysates and
COS cells, suggesting that it is also a bona fide Cdc42p effector.
IQGAP2 did not have GAP activity against Cdc42Hs or other small
GTPases, but as with IQGAP1 (see above), it inhibited the
intrinsic and Cdc42-GAP-stimulated GTPase activity of Cdc42Hs
and Rac1.
IQGAPs do not seem to have catalytic GAP activity against any
GTPase, but they do have the characteristics of scaffold proteins capable of interacting with multiple proteins. Taken together, the
above data suggest a possible model (Fig.
6) for IQGAP function in which
IQGAPs are inactive when bound to Ca2+-calmodulin and a
reduction in Ca2+ levels (or other signals) leads to a
loss of calmodulin-IQGAP interactions and increased
interactions between GTP-bound Cdc42p and IQGAPs. This
increased interaction leads to the oligomerization of IQGAP and the
formation of a Cdc42p-IQGAP-actin complex, enhancing the ability of
IQGAP to cross-link and possibly polymerize actin. Therefore, it
seems that IQGAPs in mammalian cells are major downstream effectors
linking Cdc42p to the actin cytoskeleton.
|
Wiskott-Aldrich Syndrome Proteins Mediate Actin Rearrangements
S. cerevisiae Bee1p/Las17p.
Another
family of potential scaffold proteins linking Cdc42p and the actin
cytoskeleton are the WASPs, with the prototypical WASP being encoded by
the gene that is defective in Wiskott-Aldrich syndrome patients (see
below). Bee1p (321) was identified from the
S. cerevisiae genome database by its similarity to the
mammalian WASP. Bee1p contains a WASP homology domain (WH1) that is
similar to PH domains, as well as a proline-rich domain that binds SH3 domains; it does not seem to contain a CRIB domain for binding Cdc42p
as does the mammalian WASP. Deletion of Bee1p resulted in a slow-growth
phenotype at room temperature and no growth at high temperatures
(321). Morphological characterization of
bee1 cells indicated defects in bud growth, cytokinesis, and actin organization. In addition, Bee1p localized to cortical actin patches and bound to actin and the actin binding protein Sla1p in
immunoprecipitation experiments (321) and to the actin
binding protein verprolin in a two-hybrid experiment (413).
The
bee1 cells were also defective in the ability to
assemble cortical actin to the buds in an in vitro permeabilized cell
system. While Bee1p clearly plays a role in actin cytoskeleton
organization, it is unclear if Bee1p interacts with Cdc42p as does its
human counterpart (Fig. 3 and 4A).
Mammalian WASPs.
Patients with Wiskott-Aldrich
syndrome have multiple immunological defects, including
thrombocytopenia with small platelets, eczema, T- and B-lymphocyte
defects, and an increased risk of malignancies and autoimmune diseases
(for reviews, see references 144, 261, and
427). The severity of these defects has been directly correlated with mutations within the X-linked recessive gene
WASP and with defects in cellular actin cytoarchitecture (122, 257, 270, 285, 399, 428, 475, 577, 636, 637). The
~62-kDa WASP (19, 271, 545) contains several functional domains including an N-terminal WH1 domain (residues 8 to 105), a CRIB
domain (residues 238 to 257), a proline-rich domain (residues 312 to
404), two potential actin binding sites with similarity to verprolin
and cofilin sequences (residues 430 to 446 and 469 to 489), and an
acidic C-terminal region. A human WASP-GST fusion protein containing
residues 48 to 321 bound to GTP-Cdc42Hs, but not GTP-bound RhoA
or Rac1, in GST affinity chromatography experiments, and this binding
depended on the presence of the WASP CRIB domain (545) and
the Cdc42 effector domain (291), suggesting that WASP is a
Cdc42p-specific effector. Ectopic expression of FLAG-tagged WASP in rat
kidney epithelial cells indicated that WASP was present predominantly
in cytosolic clusters and colocalized with actin structures excluding
stress fibers. Formation of these clusters was inhibited by addition of
cytochalasin D and by coexpression of the dominant negative
Cdc42T17N mutant protein but not the dominant negative Rho
or Rac mutant proteins (545), reinforcing the specific
interactions seen between WASPs and Cdc42p. It was reported that the
Cdc42 Y40C effector domain mutation abolished interactions with WASP
and other CRIB domain-containing proteins but did not affect the
generation of actin-dependent morphological structures, suggesting that
other downstream effectors mediated Cdc42p-actin interactions
(291). However, examination of the data indicates that the
Y40C mutation, while interfering with p65PAK kinase
activity in immunoprecipitates, reduced but did not abolish the binding
of GST-WASP (containing amino acids 201 to 321 of WASP) to
[
-32P]GTP-loaded Cdc42Q61L, Y40C
mutant protein in a nitrocellulose overlay assay (291, 388), leaving open the question of the physiological role of WASP-Cdc42 interactions.
Other Effectors
Gic1p and Gic2p.
The S. cerevisiae Gic1p
and Gic2p downstream effectors were identified in two independent
studies (54, 83). Gic1p was identified by its ability to
suppress the bem2-101ts growth and bud site
selection phenotypes (83), and Gic1p and Gic2p were
identified through a search of the S. cerevisiae genome database for proteins that contained CRIB domains (54).
Gic1p and Gic2p were 39% identical and 54% similar in predicted amino acid sequence and were not homologous to other proteins in the database. Deletion of GIC1 or GIC2 did not lead
to abnormal phenotypes, but a
gic1
gic2 double mutant
did not grow at high temperatures and displayed numerous morphological
abnormalities at semipermissive temperatures, including the presence of
a large percentage of large, unbudded, multinucleate cells, delocalized
chitin deposition, aberrant actin organization, and abnormal mitotic
spindles, suggesting a role for Gic1p/Gic2p in cellular morphogenesis,
as well as defects in mating-projection formation and reduced mating
efficiencies, suggesting a role in the mating pathway.
S bound to columns containing purified Gic2p, and
both Gic1p and Gic2p interacted with Cdc42p in two-hybrid protein assays (54, 83). These interactions were enhanced with
the activated Cdc42G12Vp and were between the Gic1/2 CRIB
domains and the Cdc42 effector domain, as evidenced by the interactions
being abolished by the Cdc42T35Ap effector domain mutation
and CRIB domain mutations and/or deletions. Further genetic
experiments that solidified the physiological interactions between
Gic1p, Gic2p, and Cdc42p included the observations that overexpression
of the Gic2p CRIB domain led to a dominant growth arrest that could be
suppressed by overexpression of Cdc42p but not Cdc42T35Ap
(54); that the
gic2 mutation exacerbated the
cdc42-1 and cdc24-2 ts phenotypes
(83); that overexpression of Cdc42p suppressed the
gic1
gic2 ts phenotype (54, 83); that
overexpression of the Rga1p GAP exacerbated the
gic1
gic2
ts phenotype (83); that overexpression of Cla4p, but
not Ste20p or Skm1p, could partially suppress the
gic1
gic2 double mutant (83); and that
gic1
gic2
cla4 triple mutants had a more severe cytokinesis
defect than
cla4 mutants did (83).
The levels of Gic2p cycled through the cell cycle with an accumulation
during G1 phase and a peak around the time of septin ring
formation ~15 min prior to bud emergence (54). Cell
cycle-dependent regulation of Gic2p levels has recently been shown to
be through ubiquitin-dependent degradation shortly after bud emergence
(237). This degradation required the SCF (for
"Skp1-cullin-F-box")-Grr1 protein complex and depended on
the phosphorylation of Gic2p and the binding of Gic2p to
GTP-bound Cdc42p, suggesting that Cdc42p is needed not only
for Gic2p function but also for its degradation. Subcellular
localization of HA-tagged Gic1p and Gic2p (54) indicated that they were distributed to the site of incipient bud emergence and
to the tips of enlarging buds and mating projections in a pattern
similar to that seen with Cdc42p (643). However, analysis of
GFP-Gic1p localization revealed a more complex picture (83). GFP-Gic1p localized to the site of incipient bud emergence in the
mother and daughter progenitor cells in early G1 and to the tips of enlarging buds. It seemed to disappear from the bud tip in
medium- to large-budded cells but appeared at sites adjacent to the
mother-bud neck regions in haploid cells, from which the bud would
emerge in the next cell cycle. In some large-budded cells, GFP-Gic1p
appeared in a ring structure at the mother-bud neck region but did not
persist there after cytokinesis. Interestingly, there are differing
data concerning the role of the CRIB domains in Gic1p and Gic2p
function and localization. Gic2p lacking its CRIB domain was unable to
complement the
gic1
gic2 double mutant, and HA-Gic2p
lacking its CRIB domain was distributed diffusely throughout the
cytoplasm (54), suggesting that Gic2p interactions with
Cdc42p were necessary for proper function and localization. The
localization of GFP-Gic1p, however, was not dramatically altered upon
deletion of its CRIB domain, and expression of CRIB-deleted Gic1p could
still partially suppress the
gic1
gic2 double mutant (83), suggesting that interactions with Cdc42p are important but not essential for Gic1p function and localization. These analyses of Gic1p and Gic2p function suggest that they play an important role in
bud site selection and actin organization through their interactions
with Cdc42p.
Zds1p and Zds2p.
S. cerevisiae Zds1p and Zds2p
were identified in multiple genetic screens (see below) including a
screen for negative regulators of Cdc42p function (42). The
915-amino-acid Zds1p and the 942-amino-acid Zds2p exhibited ~42%
similarity and contained potential coiled-coil domains but did not
contain recognizable CRIB domains. Overexpression of Zds1p reduced the
restrictive temperatures of the cdc24-10 and
cdc42-1 mutants, led to a large proportion of enlarged
unbudded cells when expressed in the cdc24-12 mutant, and
altered chitin and actin localization in haploid cells (42),
reinforcing its potential role as a negative regulator of the cell
polarity pathway. Deletion of Zds1p or Zds2p singly had no phenotypic
effect (however, see below), but the
zds1
zds2 double
mutant showed a reduced growth rate and a high percentage of elongated
budded cells with a single nucleus and 2C DNA content, indicating a
defect in the apical-isotropic switch and/or a G2/M
cell cycle delay, suggesting that Zds1p and Zds2p together are
needed for cell cycle progression (42, 618). Subcellular
localization of a GST-Zds1p fusion protein by using anti-GST antibodies
suggested that Zds1p localized to the sites of incipient bud emergence
as well as to tips of enlarging buds and occasionally to the mother-bud
neck region, suggesting a colocalization with Cdc42p. However, it
should be noted that a direct interaction between Zds1p or Zds2p and
Cdc42p has not been reported.
swe1 deletion suppressed the hsl1 and
hsl7 synthetic lethal mutants and the G2/M delay
observed in
hsl1 and
zds1 mutants (341, 398). Swe1p is a CDK-inhibitory kinase that
phosphorylates Cdc28 on Y19 (48, 501) thereby inhibiting
Cdc28p kinase activity and resulting in a G2/M delay from a
novel morphogenesis checkpoint monitoring bud emergence
(313, 526) (see "S. cerevisiae" under "Functional studies" above). Zds1p was shown to negatively
control Swe1p by altering its cell cycle transcriptional regulation; a
zds1 mutant altered the SWE1 mRNA periodicity
away from a peak in G1/S and delayed its repression in
G2, suggesting that Zds1p was involved in repressing Swe1p
expression in G2/M (398). One possible model,
among many, would have Zds1p and Zds2p functioning in combination with
Cdc42p in regulating the Swe1p protein kinase at a morphogenesis
checkpoint monitoring bud emergence and elongation. The binding of
Zds1p to Cdc42p at a key time in the cell cycle, possibly after
successful bud emergence or the apical-isotropic switch, could
down-regulate Swe1p activity, thereby inducing mitosis and cytokinesis.
Clearly, more experiments are needed to elucidate this interesting
connection between Cdc42p, Zds1p, and Swe1p.
Bem4p/Rom7p.
S. cerevisiae Bem4p was identified
in three separate screens as a multicopy suppressor of the
cdc42-1 mutant simultaneously overexpressing the
SRO4 gene, as a mutant that required multiple copies of
CDC42 to grow, and as a synthetic-lethal mutant with the
cdc24-4 mutation (343). The allelic Rom7p was
identified as a multicopy suppressor of a dominant negative
rho1 mutant (221). In two-hybrid protein studies,
Bem4p was shown to interact with Cdc42p, Rho1p, Rho2p, and Rho4p, and
it interacted equally well with the Cdc42G12V,
Cdc42Q61L, and Cdc42D118A constructs,
suggesting that it can interact with both GTP-bound and GDP-bound
Cdc42p. However, in vivo interactions between these proteins have not
been reported. Deletion of BEM4 led to cell inviability at
37°C with a cellular morphology of large, round, unbudded,
multinucleate cells containing delocalized actin, and this
ts phenotype could be suppressed by simultaneous
overexpression of both Cdc42p and Rho1p. It should be noted, however,
that these phenotypes varied in different strain backgrounds. Due to
its ability to interact with multiple Rho-type GTPases in
S. cerevisiae, the physiological role for Bem4p is elusive,
but an interesting observation was that deletion of the Rho-GDI, Rdi1p,
led to cell inviability in the presence of a
bem4
mutation (unpublished results cited in reference
343), suggesting that Bem4p and Rdi1p, while showing
no sequence similarity to each other, may have overlapping functions in vivo.
70-kDa S6 kinase. The mammalian 70-kDa S6 kinase (pp70S6k) is involved in growth control, translation initiation, and progression through the G1/S phase of the cell cycle through its phosphorylation of ribosomal protein S6 and the subsequent translation of 5' terminal oligopyrimidine tract-containing mRNA (for reviews, see references 92, 238, and 557). The pp70S6k kinase activity is activated by a number of different regulatory signals including growth factors, phorbol esters, and cytokines, and this activation is inhibited by the immunosuppressant drug rapamycin, which functions through its binding to the FK506 binding protein rapamycin-associated protein FRAP (also known as RAFT and TOR), a PI 3-kinase-like protein kinase (52, 53, 502, 503). The pp70S6k kinase activity is also activated by PI 3-kinase (82, 97, 401), and this activation is blocked by the PI 3-kinase inhibitors wortmannin and LY294002. Immunoprecipitated HA-tagged pp70S6k from NIH 3T3 and COS cells had in vitro kinase activity against ribosomal protein S6 as a substrate, and this activity was enhanced by cotransfection with activated GST-Cdc42G12V and GST-Rac1G12V, but not GST-RhoAG12V, and by the Cdc42-GEF Dbl and was inhibited by dominant negative Cdc42 and Rac mutants (93), suggesting that activation of Cdc42p leads to activation of pp70S6k kinase activity. Cotransfection with activated GST-Cdc42G12V and GST-Rac1G12V constructs also increased the phosphorylation of pp70S6k necessary for its kinase activity, and this activation was lost in the Cdc42T35A effector domain mutant and in the Cdc42C189S prenylation mutant, suggesting that proper subcellular localization is necessary for the interaction between Cdc42p and pp70S6k. The growth factor-induced activation of pp70S6k activity seemed to be independent of the activation of the JNK and p38 kinase activities, but the Cdc42p-induced pp70S6k activation was blocked by the addition of rapamycin and wortmannin, suggesting that FRAP and PI 3-kinase function in the activation pathway.
E. coli-produced GST-GTP
S-Cdc42p fusion protein
formed an in vitro complex with pp70S6k from NIH 3T3
cell extracts and an in vivo complex in COS cells as assayed by GST
affinity chromatography and coimmunoprecipitation of HA-tagged Cdc42p
with endogenous pp70S6k (93). This interaction
and subsequent activation of pp70S6k activity was not seen
with the dominant negative Cdc42T17N mutant protein and was
lost in the presence of the T35A mutation, suggesting that
pp70S6k is a physiological Cdc42p downstream effector that
interacts with the Cdc42p effector domain. Cdc42p bound to
hypophosphorylated pp70S6k species and immunoprecipitated
complexes did not have kinase activity, suggesting that Cdc42p binds to
the inactive pp70S6k. This in vivo complex formation was
resistant to addition of wortmannin and rapamycin, suggesting that
their actions occur upstream or independent of
Cdc42p-pp70S6k binding. Addition of cytochalasin D did not
affect Cdc42p-induced activation of pp70S6k activity
(reference 93 and data not shown), suggesting that this Cdc42p pathway was independent of actin-associated events. However, recent studies have identified a neural tissue-specific F-actin binding protein termed neurabin that can interact with both F-actin and pp70S6k (60, 412). The
physiological ramifications of Cdc42p-pp70S6k interactions
are unknown, but they could play a role in Cdc42p-dependent cell cycle
progression or growth control (see "Mammals" under "Functional
studies" above).
Examination of the S. cerevisiae genome database does not
reveal the presence of a recognizable pp70S6k
species, but S. cerevisiae does contain two FRAP
homologs, named Tor1p and Tor2p (for a review, see reference
557). Both Tor1p and Tor2p are involved in
rapamycin-sensitive translation initiation and G1 cell
cycle progression (27), but Tor2p is also involved in
organization of the actin cytoskeleton (512), and this
function occurs through interactions with the Rom2p GEF for the Rho1p
and Rho2p GTPases (510). A connection between the
S. cerevisiae Tor proteins and Cdc42p has not been
described to date.
CDC42 AND HUMAN DISEASE
|
|
|---|
As detailed in the above sections, the analysis of Cdc42p function in cultured mammalian cells and the characterization of Cdc42p effectors and regulators suggest that Cdc42p functions in a variety of human diseases through modulation of the actin cytoskeleton and JNK-dependent transcriptional induction events (see above for references). First, the observations that (i) Cdc42p is implicated in Ras-dependent cellular transformation, (ii) injection of Cdc42G12V-expressing cells into athymic nude mice led to the formation of tumors, and (iii) expression of the Cdc42F28L mutant protein led to cellular transformation similar to that seen with expression of the dbl oncogene (a Cdc42p GEF) indicate that activation of Cdc42p can lead to malignant transformation and that cdc42 is a bona fide oncogene. It should be noted, however, that the presence of activated Cdc42 alleles in human tumor cells has not been reported to date. Second, the mammalian WAS proteins, encoded by the genetic locus responsible for the Wiskott-Aldrich syndrome immunological disorder, bind specifically to GTP-Cdc42p, but not to GTP-bound RhoA or Rac1, and mediate Cdc42p-actin interactions. Third, the polycystic kidney disease I (PKD1) protein, which plays a role in autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease, was shown to induce c-Jun/AP-1 transcriptional activation through the activation of the Cdc42-dependent JNK pathway. Fourth, the myotonic dystrophy kinase-related Cdc42-binding kinase (MRCK) interacts with Cdc42p in the regulation of actin rearrangements. Fifth, the faciogenital dysplasia protein FGD1, which is encoded by the genetic locus responsible for the X-linked developmental disorder Aarskog-Scott syndrome, is believed to be a Cdc42-specific GEF in vivo. Sixth, activation of the Nef-associated kinase (NAK) was mediated through Cdc42p, suggesting that Cdc42p plays a role in Nef-dependent HIV replication. Finally, the Salmonella SopE protein acts as a GEF for Cdc42p, leading to the actin rearrangements necessary for Salmonella invasion of host epithelial cells. It is likely that Cdc42p will also play a critical role in other human diseases that involve actin rearrangements or JNK pathway activation, and so a detailed understanding of Cdc42p structure and function could be invaluable in developing therapeutic strategies.
CONCLUSIONS AND FUTURE RESEARCH DIRECTIONS
|
|
|---|
The experimental results detailed in this review strongly support a model in which Cdc42p interacts with multiple regulators and effectors to activate a variety of cellular processes. It is interesting that Cdc42p has not been implicated as a negative or inhibitory factor in any cellular process; therefore, its roles seem to be positive or stimulatory in nature. The two primary Cdc42-dependent pathways leading to actin rearrangements and transcriptional inductions through protein kinase signaling cascades seem to be conserved in most cell types examined. However, it is dangerous to extrapolate precise Cdc42p functions or mutational phenotypes from one organism to another, given, for instance, the differences in phenotypes seen between analogous cdc42 mutants in S. cerevisiae and S. pombe (see "Functional studies" above). It has been difficult to address whether the downstream effectors that mediate these two pathways are separate and independent or whether there is substantial cross-talk between the physiological pathways. This question should be vigorously addressed in the future.
It is unfortunate that despite all the detailed information we have garnered about Cdc42 functions and interacting proteins, we have little experimental data addressing the specific mechanism(s)-of-action for Cdc42p in these different cellular processes. It seems likely that one of the major roles that Cdc42p plays is in transducing exogenous and/or endogenous signals to downstream effectors by specifically binding and localizing these effectors to the appropriate subcellular locations so that they can interact with further downstream components, in much the same manner that Ras does with Raf. The formation of these multiprotein complexes at discrete locations within the cell in response to different signals could be a primary regulatory mechanism for the specificity of Cdc42p function within different pathways. This hypothesis should be tested in the future through the phenotypic analysis of different Cdc42p effector domain mutations and their interactions with different downstream effectors and through subcellular colocalization studies with epitope-tagged or GFP fusion proteins. The observations that Cdc42p can function at several points in the cell cycle adds an additional layer of complexity to understanding these differential regulatory interactions, but analysis of different effector domain mutations should provide some insight into this aspect of Cdc42p function as well.
So what are the future research directions for deciphering Cdc42p function? The answer to this question will be determined partly by the organism in which experiments are performed. For instance, genetic and biochemical studies in S. cerevisiae and in cultured mammalian cells, and to a lesser extent in S. pombe, have identified a myriad of Cdc42p regulators and effectors, but only recently have experiments designed to test specific protein-protein interactions and multiprotein complex formation been performed. In addition, little is known about the in vivo specificity of assorted GEFs, GAPs, GDIs, or downstream effectors or about the targeting mechanisms for Cdc42p to the plasma membrane at sites of polarized growth in response to different signals or at different times in the cell cycle. Therefore, future experiments with these organisms will probably focus on these issues. Few Cdc42p effectors and regulators have been identified or characterized in Drosophila and C. elegans, and so these proteins must be isolated before detailed mechanistic questions can be addressed. However, the mechanistic studies in yeast and mammalian cells should develop useful paradigms that will allow for more defined questions to be addressed in Drosophila and C. elegans. Interestingly, no bona fide Cdc42p homologs have been identified in fungal systems outside of the unicellular yeast or in plant systems, although multiple Rac homologs have been identified (118, 319, 563, 598). Given the high degree of cellular polarization seen in fungal and plant cell growth patterns, it would be surprising if Cdc42p homologs did not exist and were not involved in these processes. Finally, given the recent determination of the NMR and X-ray crystal structures of Cdc42p and Cdc42p complexed with one of its GAPs, future molecular modeling studies could provide valuable insight into the effects of various loss-of-function, gain-of-function, and effector domain mutations on Cdc42p structure and function and its interactions with downstream effectors and regulators. The much anticipated NMR and/or X-ray crystal structure determinations of Cdc42p complexed with a downstream effector or GEF or GDI should greatly enhance our knowledge of the mechanisms of action of these proteins. All in all, the explosion of research centered on Cdc42p over the past 5 to 10 years has only served to whet our appetite for more details, which will certainly be forthcoming in the very near future.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
|
|
|---|
I thank the many colleagues who have shared their results prior to publication, especially Nicolas Nassar and Rick Cerione for the Cdc42p structure figure (Fig. 1B). I also thank the members of the Johnson laboratory, both past and present, for their many helpful discussions, as well as David Pederson, Gary Ward, and the anonymous reviewers for an insightful and critical examination of this review.
Research in my laboratory has been supported by grants from the National Science Foundation, the American Cancer Society, and the U.S. Department of Agriculture.
FOOTNOTES
* Mailing address: Department of Microbiology & Molecular Genetics, University of Vermont, 202A Stafford Hall, Burlington, VT 05405. Phone: (802) 656-8203. Fax: (802) 656-8749. E-mail: dijohnso{at}zoo.uvm.edu.
REFERENCES
|
|
|---|
| 1. |
Adachi, H.,
Y. Takahashi,
T. Hasebe,
M. Shirouzu,
S. Yokoyama, and K. Sutoh.
1997.
Dictyostelium IQGAP-related protein specifically involved in the completion of cytokinesis.
J. Cell Biol.
137:891-898 |
| 2. |
Adams, A. E. M.,
D. I. Johnson,
R. M. Longnecker,
B. F. Sloat, and J. R. Pringle.
1990.
CDC42 and CDC43, two additional genes involved in budding and the establishment of cell polarity in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae.
J. Cell Biol.
111:131-142 |
| 3. |
Adams, A. E. M., and J. R. Pringle.
1984.
Relationship of actin and tubulin distribution to bud growth in wild-type and morphogenetic-mutant Saccharomyces cerevisiae.
J. Cell Biol.
98:934-945 |
| 4. | Adra, C. N., J. Ko, D. Leonard, L. J. Wirth, R. A. Cerione, and B. Lim. 1993. Identification of a novel protein with GDP dissociation inhibitor activity for the Ras-like proteins CDC42Hs and Rac1. Genes Chromosomes Cancer 8:253-261[Medline]. |
| 5. |
Adra, C. N.,
D. Manor,
J. L. Ko,
S. Zhu,
T. Horiuchi,
L. V. Aelst,
R. A. Cerione, and B. Lim.
1997.
RhoGDI : a GDP-dissociation inhibitor for Rho proteins with preferential expression in brain and pancreas.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
94:4279-4284 |
| 6. |
Aepfelbacher, M.,
F. Vauti,
P. C. Weber, and J. A. Glomset.
1994.
Spreading of differentiating human monocytes is associated with a major increase in membrane-bound CDC42.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
91:4263-4267 |
| 7. |
Agnel, M.,
L. Roder,
C. Vola, and R. Griffin-Shea.
1992.
A Drosophila rotund transcript expressed during spermatogenesis and imaginal disc morphogenesis encodes a protein which is similar to human Rac GTPase-activating (racGAP) proteins.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
12:5111-5122 |
| 8. |
Ahmed, S.,
J. Lee,
L.-P. Wen,
Z. Zhao,
J. Ho,
A. Best,
R. Kozma, and L. Lim.
1994.
Breakpoint cluster region gene product-related domain of n-chimaerin. Discrimination between Rac-binding and GTPase-activating residues by mutational analysis.
J. Biol. Chem.
269:17642-17648 |
| 9. |
Akada, R.,
L. Kallal,
D. I. Johnson, and J. Kurjan.
1996.
Genetic relationships between the G protein ![]() complex, Ste5p, Ste20p, and Cdc42p: investigation of effector roles in the yeast pheromone response pathway.
Genetics
143:103-117[Abstract].
|
| 10. |
Alberts, A. S.,
N. Bouquin,
L. H. Johnston, and R. Treisman.
1998.
Analysis of RhoA-binding proteins reveals an interaction domain conserved in heterotrimeric G protein subunits and the yeast response regulator protein Skn7.
J. Biol. Chem.
273:8616-8622 |
| 11. |
Albrecht-Buehler, G.
1976.
Filopodia of spreading 3T3 cells.
J. Cell Biol.
69:275-286 |
| 12. | Allen, W. E., G. E. Jones, J. W. Pollard, and A. J. Ridley. 1997. Rho, Rac and Cdc42 regulate actin organization and cell adhesion in macrophages. J. Cell Sci. 110:707-720[Abstract]. |
| 13. |
Allen, W. E.,
D. Zicha,
A. J. Ridley, and G. E. Jones.
1998.
A role for Cdc42 in macrophage chemotaxis.
J. Cell Biol.
141:1147-1157 |
| 14. |
Altman, R., and D. Kellogg.
1997.
Control of mitotic events by Nap1 and the Gin4 kinase.
J. Cell Biol.
138:119-130 |
| 15. | Amberg, D. C., J. E. Zahner, J. W. Mulholland, J. R. Pringle, and D. Botstein. 1997. Aip3p/Bud6p, a yeast actin-interacting protein that is involved in morphogenesis and the selection of bipolar budding sites. Mol. Biol. Cell 8:729-753[Abstract]. |
| 16. |
Anderson, B. L.,
I. Boldogh,
M. Evangelista,
C. Boone,
L. A. Greene, and L. A. Pon.
1998.
The src homology domain 3 (SH3) of a yeast type I myosin, Myo5p, binds to verprolin and is required for targeting to sites of actin polarization.
J. Cell Biol.
141:1357-1370 |
| 17. |
Arnould, T.,
E. Kim,
L. Tsiokas,
F. Jochimsen,
W. Gruning,
J. D. Chang, and G. Walz.
1998.
The polycystic kidney disease I gene product mediates protein kinase C -dependent and c-Jun N-terminal kinase-dependent activation of the transcription factor AP-1.
J. Biol. Chem.
273:6013-6018 |
| 18. | Aspenström, P. 1997. A Cdc42 target protein with homology to the non-kinase domain of FER has a potential role in regulating the actin cytoskeleton. Curr. Biol. 7:479-487[Medline]. |
| 19. | Aspenström, P., U. Lindberg, and A. Hall. 1996. Two GTPases, Cdc42 and Rac, bind directly to a protein implicated in the immunodeficiency disorder Wiskott-Aldrich syndrome. Curr. Biol. 6:70-75[Medline]. |
| 20. |
Auer, K. L.,
J. Contessa,
S. Brenz-Verca,
L. Pirola,
S. Rusconi,
G. Cooper,
A. Abo,
M. P. Wymann,
R. J. Davis,
M. Birrer, and P. Dent.
1998.
The Ras/Rac1/Cdc42/SEK/JNK/c-Jun cascade is a key pathway by which agonists stimulate DNA synthesis in primary cultures of rat hepatocytes.
Mol. Biol. Cell
9:561-573 |
| 21. |
Ayscough, K. R.,
J. Stryker,
N. Pokala,
M. Sanders,
P. Crews, and D. G. Drubin.
1997.
High rates of actin filament turnover in budding yeast and roles for actin in establishment and maintenance of cell polarity revealed using the actin inhibitor latrunculin-A.
J. Cell Biol.
137:399-416 |
| 22. |
Backlund, P. S., Jr.
1992.
GTP-stimulated carboxyl methylation of a soluble form of the GTP-binding protein G25K in brain.
J. Biol. Chem.
267:18432-18439 |
| 23. |
Bagrodia, S.,
B. Derijard,
R. J. Davis, and R. A. Cerione.
1995.
Cdc42 and PAK-mediated signaling leads to Jun kinase and p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase activation.
J. Biol. Chem.
270:27995-27998 |
| 24. |
Bagrodia, S.,
S. J. Taylor,
C. L. Creasy,
J. Chernoff, and R. A. Cerione.
1995.
Identification of a mouse p21Cdc42/Rac activated kinase.
J. Biol. Chem.
270:22731-22737 |
| 25. | Banin, S., O. Truong, D. R. Katz, M. D. Waterfield, P. M. Brickell, and I. Gout. 1996. Wiskott-Aldrich syndrome protein (WASp) is a binding partner for c-Src family protein-tyrosine kinases. Curr. Biol. 6:981-988[Medline]. |
| 26. |
Banuett, F.
1998.
Signalling in the yeasts: an informational cascade with links to the filamentous fungi.
Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev.
62:249-274 |
| 27. | Barbet, N. C., U. Schneider, S. B. Helliwell, I. Stansfield, M. F. Tuite, and M. N. Hall. 1996. TOR controls translation initiation and early G1 progression in yeast. Mol. Biol. Cell 7:25-42[Abstract]. |
| 28. |
Barfod, E. T.,
Y. Zheng,
W.-J. Kuang,
M. J. Hart,
T. Evans,
R. A. Cerione, and A. Ashkenazi.
1993.
Cloning and expression of a human CDC42 GTPase-activating protein reveals a functional SH3-binding domain.
J. Biol. Chem.
268:26059-26062 |
| 29. | Barrett, K., M. Leptin, and J. Settleman. 1997. The rho GTPase and a putative RhoGEF mediate a signaling pathway for the cell shape changes in Drosophila gastrulation. Cell 91:905-915[Medline]. |
| 30. |
Bashour, A. M.,
A. T. Fullerton,
M. J. Hart, and G. S. Bloom.
1997.
IQGAP1, a Rac- and Cdc42-binding protein, directly binds and cross-links microfilaments.
J. Cell Biol.
137:1555-1566 |
| 31. | Bax, B. 1998. Domains of rasGAP and rhoGAP are related. Nature 392:447-448[Medline]. |
| 32. |
Bazenet, C. E.,
M. A. Mota, and L. L. Rubin.
1998.
The small GTP-binding protein Cdc42 is required for nerve growth factor withdrawal-induced neuronal death.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
95:3984-3989 |
| 33. |
Ben-Ami, G.,
V. Ozeri,
E. Hanski,
F. Hofmann,
K. Aktories,
K. M. Hahn,
G. M. Bokoch, and I. Rosenshine.
1998.
Agents that inhibit Rho, Rac, and Cdc42 do not block formation of actin pedestals in HeLa cells infected with enteropathogenic Escherichia coli.
Infect. Immun.
66:1755-1758 |
| 34. |
Bender, A.
1993.
Genetic evidence for the roles of the bud-site-selection genes BUD5 and BUD2 in control of the Rsr1p (Bud1p) GTPase in yeast.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
90:9926-9929 |
| 35. |
Bender, A., and J. R. Pringle.
1989.
Multicopy suppression of the cdc24 budding defect in yeast by CDC42 and three newly identified genes including the ras-related gene RSR1.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
86:9976-9980 |
| 36. |
Bender, A., and J. R. Pringle.
1991.
Use of a screen for synthetic lethal and multicopy suppressee mutants to identify two new genes involved in morphogenesis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
11:1295-1305 |
| 37. |
Bender, L.,
H. S. Lo,
H. Lee,
V. Kokojan,
J. Peterson, and A. Bender.
1996.
Associations among PH and SH3 domain-containing proteins and Rho-type GTPases in yeast.
J. Cell Biol.
133:879-894 |
| 38. | Benton, B. K., A. Tinkelenberg, I. Gonzalez, and F. R. Cross. 1997. Cla4p, a Saccharomyces cerevisiae Cdc42p-activated kinase involved in cytokinesis, is activated at mitosis. Mol. Cell. Biol. 17:5067-5076[Abstract]. |
| 39. | Benton, B. K., A. H. Tinkelenberg, D. Jean, S. D. Plump, and F. R. Cross. 1993. Genetic analysis of Cln/Cdc28 regulation of cell morphogenesis in budding yeast. EMBO J. 12:5267-5275[Medline]. |
| 40. |
Berestetskaya, Y. V.,
M. P. Faure,
H. Ichijo, and T. A. Voyno-Yasenetskaya.
1998.
Regulation of apoptosis by -subunits of G12 and G13 proteins via apoptosis signal-regulating kinase-1.
J. Biol. Chem.
273:27816-27823 |
| 41. |
Bi, E.,
P. Maddox,
D. J. Lew,
E. D. Salmon,
J. N. McMillan,
E. Yeh, and J. R. Pringle.
1998.
Involvement of an actomyosin contractile ring in Saccharomyces cerevisiae cytokinesis.
J. Cell Biol.
142:1301-1312 |
| 42. | Bi, E., and J. R. Pringle. 1996. ZDS1 and ZDS2, genes whose products may regulate Cdc42p in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Cell. Biol. 16:5264-5275[Abstract]. |
| 43. |
Blacketer, M. J.,
C. M. Koehler,
S. G. Coats,
A. M. Myers, and P. Madaule.
1993.
Regulation of dimorphism in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: involvement of the novel protein kinase homolog Elm1p and protein phosphatase 2A.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
13:5567-5581 |
| 44. | Boguski, M. S., and F. McCormick. 1993. Proteins regulating Ras and its relatives. Nature 366:643-654[Medline]. |
| 45. |
Boivin, D., and R. Beliveau.
1995.
Subcellular distribution and membrane association of Rho-related small GTP-binding proteins in kidney cortex.
Am. J. Physiol.
269:F180-F189 |
| 46. | Boivin, D., D. Bilodeau, and R. Beliveau. 1996. Regulation of cytoskeletal functions by Rho small GTP-binding proteins in normal and cancer cells. Can. J. Physiol. Pharmacol. 74:801-810[Medline]. |
| 47. |
Bokoch, G. M.,
Y. Wang,
B. P. Bohl,
M. A. Sells,
L. A. Quilliam, and U. G. Knaus.
1996.
Interaction of the nck adapter protein with p21-activated kinase (PAK1).
J. Biol. Chem.
271:25746-25749 |
| 48. | Booher, R. N., R. J. Deshaies, and M. W. Kirschner. 1993. Properties of Saccharomyces cerevisiae wee1 and its differential regulation of p34(CDC28) in response to G1 and G2 cyclins. EMBO J. 12:3417-3426[Medline]. |
| 48a. | Boone, C. Personal communication. |
| 49. |
Bourdoulous, S.,
G. Orend,
D. A. MacKenna,
R. Pasqualini, and E. Ruoslahti.
1998.
Fibronectin matrix regulates activation of RHO and CDC42 GTPases and cell cycle progression.
J. Cell Biol.
143:267-276 |
| 50. | Bourne, H. R. 1997. The arginine finger strikes again. Nature 389:673-674[Medline]. |
| 51. | Brill, S., S. Li, C. W. Lyman, D. M. Church, J. J. Wasmuth, L. Weissbach, A. Bernards, and A. J. Snijders. 1996. The Ras GTPase-activating-protein-related human protein IQGAP2 harbors a potential actin binding domain and interacts with calmodulin and Rho family GTPases. Mol. Cell. Biol. 16:4869-4878[Abstract]. |
| 52. | Brown, E. J., M. W. Albers, T. B. Shin, K. Ichikawa, C. T. Keith, W. S. Lane, and S. L. Schreiber. 1994. A mammalian protein targeted by G1-arresting rapamycin-receptor complex. Nature 369:756-758[Medline]. |
| 53. | Brown, E. J., P. A. Beal, C. T. Keith, J. Chen, T. B. Shin, and S. L. Schreiber. 1995. Control of p70 S6 kinase by kinase activity of FRAP in vivo. Nature 377:441-446[Medline]. |
| 54. |
Brown, J. L.,
M. Jaquenoud,
M.-P. Gulli,
J. Chant, and M. Peter.
1997.
Novel Cdc42-binding proteins Gic1 and Gic2 control cell polarity in yeast.
Genes Dev.
11:2972-2982 |
| 55. | Brown, J. L., L. Stowers, M. Baer, J. Trejo, S. Coughlin, and J. Chant. 1996. Human Ste20 homologue hPAK1 links GTPases to the JNK MAP kinase pathway. Curr. Biol. 6:598-605[Medline]. |
| 56. |
Bryant, S. S.,
S. Briggs,
T. E. Smithgall,
G. A. Martin,
F. McCormick,
J.-H. Chang,
S. J. Parsons, and R. Jove.
1995.
Two SH2 domains of p120 Ras GTPase-activating protein bind synergistically to tyrosine phosphorylated p190 Rho GTPase-activating protein.
J. Biol. Chem.
270:17947-17952 |
| 57. |
Brzeska, H.,
J. Szczepanowska,
J. Hoey, and E. D. Korn.
1996.
The catalytic domain of Acanthamoeba myosin I heavy chain kinase. II. Expression of active catalytic domain and sequence homology to p21-activated kinase (PAK).
J. Biol. Chem.
271:27056-27062 |
| 58. |
Bunnell, S. C.,
P. A. Henry,
R. Kolluri,
T. Kirchhausen,
R. J. Rickles, and L. J. Berg.
1996.
Identification of Itk/Tsk Src homology 3 domain ligands.
J. Biol. Chem.
271:25646-25656 |
| 59. |
Burbelo, P. D.,
D. Drechsel, and A. Hall.
1995.
A conserved binding motif defines numerous candidate target proteins for both Cdc42 and Rac GTPases.
J. Biol. Chem.
270:29071-29074 |
| 60. |
Burnett, P. E.,
S. Blackshaw,
M. M. Lai,
I. A. Qureshi,
A. F. Burnett,
D. M. Sabatini, and S. H. Snyder.
1998.
Neurabin is a synaptic protein linking p70 S6 kinase and the neuronal cytoskeleton.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
95:8351-8356 |
| 61. | Cabib, E., J. Drgonová, and T. Drgon. 1998. Role of small G proteins in yeast cell polarization and wall biosynthesis. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 67:307-333[Medline]. |
| 62. | Cahill, M. A., M. E. Peter, F. C. Kischkel, A. M. Chinnaiyan, V. M. Dixit, P. H. Krammer, and A. Nordheim. 1996. CD95 (APO-1/Fas) induces activation of SAP kinases downstream of ICE-like proteases. Oncogene 13:2087-2096[Medline]. |
| 63. |
Cali, B. M.,
T. C. Doyle,
D. Botstein, and G. R. Fink.
1998.
Multiple functions for actin during filamentous growth of Saccharomyces cerevisiae.
Mol. Biol. Cell
9:1873-1889 |
| 64. | Camus, C., E. Boy-Marcotte, and M. Jacquet. 1994. Two subclasses of guanine exchange factor (GEF) domains revealed by comparison of activities of chimeric genes constructed from CDC25, SDC25, and BUD5 in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Gen. Genet. 245:167-176[Medline]. |
| 65. | Cantor, S. B., T. Urano, and L. A. Feig. 1995. Identification and characterization of Ral-binding protein 1, a potential downstream target of Ral GTPases. Mol. Cell. Biol. 15:4578-4584[Abstract]. |
| 66. | Caplin, B. E., L. A. Hettich, and M. S. Marshall. 1994. Substrate characterization of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae protein farnesyltransferase and type-I protein geranylgeranyltransferase. Biochim. Biophy. Acta 1205:39-48[Medline]. |
| 67. |
Carroll, C. W.,
R. Altman,
D. Schieltz,
J. R. Yates III, and D. Kellogg.
1998.
The septins are required for the mitosis-specific activation of the Gin4 kinase.
J. Cell Biol.
143:709-717 |
| 68. | Castrillon, D. H., and S. A. Wasserman. 1994. Diaphanous is required for cytokinesis in Drosophila and shares domains of similarity with the products of the limb deformity gene. Development 120:3367-3377[Abstract]. |
| 69. | Cereijido, M., J. Valdes, L. Shoshani, and R. G. Contreras. 1998. Role of tight junctions in establishing and maintaining cell polarity. Annu. Rev. Physiol. 60:161-177[Medline]. |
| 70. | Cerione, R. 1998. A difference of opinion or a matter of perspective? Trends Biochem. Sci. 23:100[Medline]. |
| 71. | Cerione, R. A., and Y. Zheng. 1996. Dbl family of oncogenes. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 8:216-222[Medline]. |
| 72. | Chabre, M., B. Antonny, and S. Paris. 1998. PIP2: activator ... or terminator of small G proteins? Trends Biochem. Sci. 23:98-99[Medline]. |
| 73. | Chang, E. C., M. Barr, Y. Wang, V. Jung, H.-P. Xu, and M. H. Wigler. 1994. Cooperative interaction of S. pombe proteins required for mating and morphogenesis. Cell 79:131-141[Medline]. |
| 74. |
Chang, F.,
D. Drubin, and P. Nurse.
1997.
Cdc12p, a protein required for cytokinesis in fission yeast, is a component of the cell division ring and interacts with profilin.
J. Cell Biol.
137:169-182 |
| 75. |
Chang, H. Y.,
H. Nishitoh,
X. Yang,
H. Ichijo, and D. Baltimore.
1998.
Activation of apoptosis signal-regulating kinase 1 (ASK1) by the adapter protein Daxx.
Science
281:1860-1863 |
| 76. |
Chang, J.-H.,
S. Gill,
J. Settleman, and S. J. Parsons.
1995.
c-Src regulates the simultaneous rearrangement of actin cytoskeleton, p190RhoGAP, and p120RasGAP following epidermal growth factor stimulation.
J. Cell Biol.
130:355-368 |
| 77. | Chant, J. 1996. Generation of cell polarity in yeast. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 8:557-564[Medline]. |
| 78. | Chant, J. 1996. Septin scaffolds and cleavage planes in Saccharomyces. Cell 84:187-190[Medline]. |
| 79. | Chant, J., K. Corrado, J. R. Pringle, and I. Herskowitz. 1991. Yeast BUD5, encoding a putative GDP-GTP exchange factor, is necessary for bud site selection and interacts with bud formation gene BEM1. Cell 65:1213-1224[Medline]. |
| 80. | Chant, J., and I. Herskowitz. 1991. Genetic control of bud site selection in yeast by a set of gene products that constitute a morphogenetic pathway. Cell 65:1203-1212[Medline]. |
| 81. | Chant, J., and J. R. Pringle. 1995. Bud5p, p. 193-196. In M. Zerial, and L. A. Huber (ed.), Guidebook to the small GTPases. Oxford University Press, Oxford, United Kingdom. |
| 82. |
Cheatham, L.,
C. J. Vlahos,
L. Cheatham,
L. Wang,
J. Blenis, and C. R. Kahn.
1994.
Phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase activation is required for insulin stimulation of pp70 S6 kinase, DNA synthesis, and glucose transporter translocation.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
14:4902-4911 |
| 83. |
Chen, G.-C.,
Y.-J. Kim, and C. S. M. Chan.
1997.
The Cdc42 GTPase-associated proteins Gic1 and Gic2 are required for polarized cell growth in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.
Genes Dev.
11:2958-2971 |
| 84. | Chen, G. C., L. Zheng, and C. S. Chan. 1996. The LIM domain-containing Dbm1 GTPase-activating protein is required for normal cellular morphogenesis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Cell. Biol. 16:1376-1390[Abstract]. |
| 85. |
Chen, L.-M.,
S. Hobbie, and J. E. Galán.
1996.
Requirement of CDC42 for Salmonella-induced cytoskeletal and nuclear responses.
Science
274:2115-2118 |
| 86. |
Chen, W.,
J. Blanc, and L. Lim.
1994.
Characterization of a promiscuous GTPase-activating protein that has a Bcr-related domain from Caenorhabditis elegans.
J. Biol. Chem.
269:820-823 |
| 87. |
Chen, W.,
S. Chen,
S. F. Yap, and L. Lim.
1996.
The Caenorhabditis elegans p21-activated kinase (CePAK) colocalizes with CeRac1 and CDC42Ce at hypodermal cell boundaries during embryo elongation.
J. Biol. Chem.
271:26362-26368 |
| 88. |
Chen, W.,
H. H. Lim, and L. Lim.
1993.
The CDC42 homologue from Caenorhabditis elegans.
J. Biol. Chem.
268:13280-13285 |
| 89. |
Chen, Y.,
X. Wang,
D. Templeton,
R. J. Davis, and T. Tan.
1996.
The role of c-Jun N-terminal kinase (JNK) in apoptosis induced by ultraviolet C and gamma radiation.
J. Biol. Chem.
271:31929-31936 |
| 90. | Chenevert, J., K. Corrado, A. Bender, J. Pringle, and I. Herskowitz. 1992. A yeast gene (BEM1) necessary for cell polarization whose product contains two SH3 domains. Nature 356:77-79[Medline]. |
| 91. | Chenevert, J., N. Valtz, and I. Herskowitz. 1994. Identification of genes required for normal pheromone-induced cell polarization in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 136:1287-1297[Abstract]. |
| 92. | Chou, M. M., and J. Blenis. 1995. The 70 kD S6 kinase: a kinase with multiple roles in mitogenic signaling. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 7:806-814[Medline]. |
| 93. | Chou, M. M., and J. Blenis. 1996. The 70 kDa S6 kinase complexes with and is activated by the Rho family G proteins Cdc42 and Rac1. Cell 85:573-583[Medline]. |
| 94. |
Chuang, T.-H.,
B. P. Bohl, and G. M. Bokoch.
1993.
Biologically active lipids are regulators of RacGDI complexation.
J. Biol. Chem.
268:26206-26211 |
| 95. |
Chuang, T.-H.,
X. Xu,
V. Kaartinen,
N. Heisterkamp,
J. Groffen, and G. M. Bokoch.
1995.
Abr and Bcr are multifunctional regulators of the Rho GTP-binding protein family.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
92:10282-10286 |
| 96. | Chuang, T. H., K. M. Hahn, J. D. Lee, D. E. Danley, and G. M. Bokoch. 1997. The small GTPase Cdc42 initiates an apoptotic signaling pathway in Jurkat T lymphocytes. Mol. Biol. Cell 8:1687-1698[Abstract]. |
| 97. | Chung, J., T. Grammer, K. P. Lemon, A. Kaslauskas, and J. Blenis. 1994. PDGF- and insulin-dependent pp70S6k activation mediated by phosphatidylinositol 3-OH kinase. Nature 370:71-75[Medline]. |
| 98. |
Cicchetti, P.,
B. J. Mayer,
G. Thiel, and D. Baltimore.
1992.
Identification of a protein that binds to the SH3 region of Abl and is similar to Bcr and GAP-rho.
Science
257:803-806 |
| 99. | Cicchetti, P., A. J. Ridley, Y. Zheng, R. A. Cerione, and D. Baltimore. 1995. 3BP-1, an SH3 domain binding protein, has GAP activity for Rac and inhibits growth factor-induced membrane ruffling in fibroblasts. EMBO J. 14:3127-3135[Medline]. |
| 100. | Cid, V. J., A. Durán, F. Del Rey, M. P. Snyder, C. Nombela, and M. Sanchez. 1995. Molecular basis of cell integrity and morphogenesis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Microbiol. Rev. 59:345-386[Abstract]. |
| 101. |
Clark, E. A.,
W. G. King,
J. S. Brugge,
M. Symons, and R. O. Hynes.
1998.
Integrin-mediated signals regulated by members of the Rho family of GTPases.
J. Cell Biol.
142:573-586 |
| 102. |
Clarke, N.,
N. Arenzana,
T. Hai,
A. Minden, and R. Prywes.
1998.
Epidermal growth factor induction of the c-jun promoter by a Rac pathway.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
18:1065-1073 |
| 103. |
Clerk, A.,
S. J. Fuller,
A. Michael, and P. H. Sugden.
1998.
Stimulation of "stress-regulated" mitogen-activated protein kinases (stress-activated protein kinases/c-Jun N-terminal kinases and p38-mitogen-activated protein kinases) in perfused rat hearts by oxidative and other stresses.
J. Biol. Chem.
273:7228-7234 |
| 104. |
Clerk, A., and P. H. Sugden.
1997.
Activation of p21-activated protein kinase ( PAK) by hyperosmotic shock in neonatal ventricular myocytes.
FEBS Lett.
403:23-25[Medline].
|
| 105. | Cohen, G. M. 1997. Caspases: the executioners of apoptosis. Biochem. J. 326:1-16[Medline]. |
| 106. |
Coleman, K. G.,
H. Y. Steensma,
D. B. Kaback, and J. R. Pringle.
1986.
Molecular cloning of chromosome I DNA from Saccharomyces cerevisiae: isolation and characterization of the CDC24 gene and adjacent regions of the chromosome.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
6:4516-4525 |
| 106a. | Collins, C., and D. I. Johnson. Unpublished data. |
| 107. |
Cooper, J. A., and D. P. Kiehart.
1996.
Septins may form a ubiquitous family of cytoskeletal filaments.
J. Cell Biol.
134:1345-1348 |
| 108. | Cory, G. O., L. MacCarthy-Morrogh, S. Banin, I. Gout, P. M. Brickell, R. J. Levinsky, C. Kinnon, and R. C. Lovering. 1996. Evidence that the Wiskott-Aldrich syndrome protein may be involved in lymphoid cell signaling pathways. J. Immunol. 157:3791-3795[Abstract]. |
| 109. | Coso, O. A., M. Chiariello, J.-C. Yu, H. Teramoto, P. Crespo, N. Xu, T. Miki, and J. S. Gutkind. 1995. The small GTP-binding proteins Rac1 and Cdc42 regulate the activity of the JNK/SAPK signaling pathway. Cell 81:1137-1146[Medline]. |
| 110. |
Csank, C.,
K. Schroppel,
E. Leberer,
D. Harcus,
O. Mohamed,
S. Meloche,
D. Y. Thomas, and M. Whiteway.
1998.
Roles of the Candida albicans mitogen-activated protein kinase homolog, Cek1p, in hyphal development and systemic candidiasis.
Infect. Immun.
66:2713-2721 |
| 111. | Cullen, B. R. 1996. HIV-1: is Nef a PAK animal. Curr. Biol. 6:1557-1559[Medline]. |
| 112. | Cvrcková, F., C. De Virgilio, E. Manser, J. R. Pringle, and K. Nasmyth. 1995. Ste20-like protein kinases are required for normal localization of cell growth and for cytokinesis in budding yeast. Genes Dev. 9:1817-1830[Abstract]. |
| 113. | Cvrcková, F., and K. Nasmyth. 1993. Yeast G1 cyclins CLN1 and CLN2 and a GAP-like protein have a role in bud formation. EMBO J. 12:5277-5286[Medline]. |
| 114. |
Dai, Q.,
E. Choy,
V. Chiu,
J. Romano,
S. R. Slivka,
S. A. Steitz,
S. Michaelis, and M. R. Philips.
1998.
Mammalian prenylcysteine carboxyl methyltransferase is in the endoplasmic reticulum.
J. Biol. Chem.
273:15030-15034 |
| 115. | Daniels, R. H., P. S. Hall, and G. M. Bokoch. 1998. Membrane targeting of p21-activated kinase 1 (PAK1) induces neurite outgrowth from PC12 cells. EMBO J. 17:754-764[Medline]. |
| 116. |
Davis, C. R.,
T. R. Richman,
S. B. Deliduka,
J. O. Blaisdell,
C. C. Collins, and D. I. Johnson.
1998.
Analysis of the mechanisms of action of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae dominant lethal cdc42G12V and dominant negative cdc42D118A mutations.
J. Biol. Chem.
273:849-858 |
| 117. | Dawid, I. B., J. J. Breen, and R. Toyama. 1998. LIM domains: multiple roles as adapters and functional modifiers in protein interactions. Trends Genet. 14:156-162[Medline]. |
| 118. | Delmer, D. P., J. R. Pear, A. Andrawis, and D. M. Stalker. 1995. Genes encoding small GTP-binding proteins analogous to mammalian rac are preferentially expressed in developing cotton fibers. Mol. Gen. Genet. 248:43-51[Medline]. |
| 119. |
DeMarini, D. J.,
A. E. M. Adams,
H. Fares,
C. DeVirgilio,
G. Valle,
J. S. Chuang, and J. R. Pringle.
1997.
A septin-based hierarchy of proteins required for localized deposition of chitin in the Saccharomyces cerevisiae cell wall.
J. Cell Biol.
139:75-93 |
| 120. | Denhardt, D. T. 1996. Signal-transducing protein phosphorylation cascades mediated by Ras/Rho proteins in the mammalian cell: the potential for multiplex signalling. Biochem. J. 318:729-747[Medline]. |
| 121. | Derijard, B., M. Hibi, I.-H. Wu, T. Barret, B. Su, T. Deng, M. Karin, and R. J. Davis. 1994. JNK1: a protein kinase stimulated by UV light and Ha-ras that binds and phosphorylates the c-Jun activation domain. Cell 76:1025-1037[Medline]. |
| 122. | Derry, J. M. J., H. J. Ochs, and U. Francke. 1994. Isolation of a novel gene mutated in Wiskott-Aldrich syndrome. Cell 78:635-644[Medline]. |
| 123. |
Dharmawardhane, S.,
L. C. Sanders,
S. S. Martin,
R. H. Daniels, and G. M. Bokoch.
1997.
Localization of p21-activated kinase 1 (PAK1) to pinocytic vesicles and cortical actin structures in stimulated cells.
J. Cell Biol.
138:1265-1278 |
| 124. | Diekmann, D., S. Brill, M. D. Garrett, M. Totty, J. Hsuan, C. Monfries, C. Hall, L. Lim, and A. Hall. 1991. Bcr encodes a GTPase-activating protein for p21rac. Nature 351:400-402[Medline]. |
| 125. | Dramsi, S., and P. Cossart. 1998. Intracellular pathogens and the actin cytoskeleton. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 14:137-166[Medline]. |
| 126. | Drubin, D. G., and W. J. Nelson. 1996. Origins of cell polarity. Cell 84:335-344[Medline]. |
| 127. | Dutartre, H., J. Davoust, J.-P. Gorvel, and P. Chavrier. 1996. Cytokinesis arrest and redistribution of actin-cytoskeleton regulatory components in cells expressing the Rho GTPase CDC42Hs. J. Cell Sci. 109:367-377[Abstract]. |
| 128. |
Eaton, S.,
P. Auvinen,
L. Luo,
Y. N. Jan, and K. Simons.
1995.
CDC42 and Rac1 control different actin-dependent processes in the Drosophila wing disc epithelium.
J. Cell Biol.
131:151-164 |
| 129. |
Eaton, S.,
R. Wepf, and K. Simons.
1996.
Roles for Rac1 and Cdc42 in planar polarization and hair outgrowth in the wing of Drosophila.
J. Cell Biol.
135:1277-1289 |
| 130. | Eby, J. J., S. P. Holly, F. vanDrogen, A. V. Grishin, M. Peter, D. G. Drubin, and K. J. Blumer. 1998. Actin cytoskeleton organization regulated by the PAK family of protein kinases. Curr. Biol. 8:967-970[Medline]. |
| 131. | Ehler, E., F. vanLeeuwen, J. G. Collard, and P. C. Salinas. 1997. Expression of Tiam-1 in the developing brain suggests a role for the Tiam-1-Rac signaling pathway in cell migration and neurite outgrowth. Mol. Cell. Neurosci. 9:1-12[Medline]. |
| 132. |
Eichinger, L.,
M. Bahler,
M. Dietz,
C. Eckerskorn, and M. Schleicher.
1998.
Characterization and cloning of a Dictyostelium Ste20-like protein kinase that phosphorylates the actin-binding protein severin.
J. Biol. Chem.
273:12952-12959 |
| 133. |
Elia, L., and L. Marsh.
1998.
A role for a protease in morphogenic responses during yeast cell fusion.
J. Cell Biol.
142:1473-1485 |
| 134. | Emmons, S., H. Phan, J. Calley, W. Chen, B. James, and L. Manseau. 1995. Cappuccino, a Drosophila maternal effect gene required for polarity of the egg and embryo, is related to the vertebrate limb deformity locus. Genes Dev. 9:2482-2494[Abstract]. |
| 135. | Epp, J. A., and J. Chant. 1997. An IQGAP-related protein controls actin-ring formation and cytokinesis in yeast. Curr. Biol. 7:921-929[Medline]. |
| 136. |
Erickson, J. W.,
R. A. Cerione, and M. J. Hart.
1997.
Identification of an actin cytoskeletal complex that includes IQGAP and the Cdc42 GTPase.
J. Biol. Chem.
272:24443-24447 |
| 137. |
Erickson, J. W.,
C. J. Zhang,
R. A. Kahn,
T. Evans, and R. A. Cerione.
1996.
Mammalian Cdc42 is a brefeldin A-sensitive component of the Golgi apparatus.
J. Biol. Chem.
271:26850-26854 |
| 138. |
Eva, A.,
G. Vecchio,
C. D. Rao,
S. R. Tronick, and S. A. Aaronson.
1988.
The predicted DBL oncogene product defines a distinct class of transforming proteins.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
85:2061-2065 |
| 139. |
Evangelista, M.,
K. Blundell,
M. S. Longtine,
C. J. Chow,
N. Adames,
J. R. Pringle,
M. Peter, and C. Boone.
1997.
Bni1p, a yeast formin linking Cdc42p and the actin cytoskeleton during polarized morphogenesis.
Science
276:118-122 |
| 140. |
Evans, T.,
M. L. Brown,
E. D. Fraser, and J. K. Northrup.
1986.
Purification of the major GTP-binding proteins from human placental membranes.
J. Biol. Chem.
261:7052-7059 |
| 141. | Fanger, G. R., P. Gerwins, C. Widmann, M. B. Jarpe, and G. L. Johnson. 1997. MEKKs, GCKs, MLKs, PAKs, TAKs, and Tpls: upstream regulators of the c-Jun amino-terminal kinases? Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 7:67-74[Medline]. |
| 142. | Fanger, G. R., N. L. Johnson, and G. L. Johnson. 1997. MEK kinases are regulated by EGF and selectively interact with Rac/Cdc42. EMBO J. 16:4961-4972[Medline]. |
| 143. | Faure, S., S. Vigneron, M. Doree, and N. Morin. 1997. A member of the Ste20/PAK family of protein kinases is involved in both arrest of xenopus oocytes at G2/prophase of the first meiotic cell cycle and in prevention of apoptosis. EMBO J. 16:5550-5561[Medline]. |
| 144. |
Featherstone, C.
1997.
The many faces of WAS protein.
Science
275:27-28 |
| 145. | Feltham, J. L., V. Dotsch, S. Raza, D. Manor, R. A. Cerione, M. J. Sutcliffe, G. Wagner, and R. E. Oswald. 1997. Definition of the switch surface in the solution structure of Cdc42Hs. Biochemistry 36:8755-8766[Medline]. |
| 146. |
Field, C., and R. Schekman.
1980.
Localized secretion of acid phosphatase reflects the pattern of cell surface growth in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.
J. Cell Biol.
86:123-128 |
| 147. |
Finegold, A. A.,
D. I. Johnson,
C. C. Farnsworth,
M. H. Gelb,
S. R. Judd,
J. A. Glomset, and F. Tamanoi.
1991.
Protein geranylgeranyltransferase of Saccharomyces cerevisiae is specific for Cys-Xaa-Xaa-Leu motif proteins and requires the CDC43 gene product, but not the DPR1 gene product.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
88:4448-4452 |
| 148. |
Foltz, I. N.,
R. E. Gerl,
J. S. Wieler,
M. Luckach,
R. A. Salmon, and J. W. Schrader.
1998.
Human mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase 7 (MKK7) is a highly conserved c-jun N-terminal kinase/stress-activated protein kinase (JNK/SAPK) activated by environmental stresses and physiological stimuli.
J. Biol. Chem.
273:9344-9351 |
| 149. | Francis, C. L., T. A. Ryan, B. D. Jones, S. J. Smith, and S. Falkow. 1993. Ruffles induced by Salmonella and other stimuli direct macropinocytosis of bacteria. Nature 364:639-642[Medline]. |
| 150. | Freshney, N. W., L. Rawlinson, F. Guesdon, E. Jones, S. Cowley, J. Hsuan, and J. Saklatvaia. 1994. Interleukin-1 activates a novel protein kinase cascade that results in the phosphorylation of Hsp27. Cell 78:1039-1049[Medline]. |
| 151. |
Frost, J. A.,
A. Khokhlatchev,
S. Stippec,
M. A. White, and M. H. Cobb.
1998.
Differential effects of PAK1-activating mutations reveal activity-dependent and -independent effects on cytoskeletal regulation.
J. Biol. Chem.
273:28191-28198 |
| 152. | Frost, J. A., H. Steen, P. Shapiro, T. Lewis, N. Ahn, P. E. Shaw, and M. H. Cobb. 1997. Cross-cascade activation of ERKs and ternary complex factors by Rho family proteins. EMBO J. 16:6426-6438[Medline]. |
| 153. | Frost, J. A., S. Xu, M. R. Hutchison, S. Marcus, and M. H. Cobb. 1996. Actions of Rho family small G proteins and p21-activated protein kinases on mitogen-activated protein kinase family members. Mol. Cell. Biol. 16:3707-3713[Abstract]. |
| 154. | Fruman, D. A., R. E. Meyers, and L. C. Cantley. 1998. Phosphoinositide kinases. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 67:481-507[Medline]. |
| 155. |
Fuchs, S. Y.,
V. Adler,
T. Buschmann,
Z. M. Yin,
X. W. Wu,
S. N. Jones, and Z. Ronai.
1998.
JNK targets p53 ubiquitination and degradation in nonstressed cells.
Genes Dev.
12:2658-2663 |
| 156. | Fuchs, S. Y., V. A. Fried, and Z. Ronai. 1998. Stress-activated kinases regulate protein stability. Oncogene 17:1483-1490[Medline]. |
| 157. |
Fujiwara, T.,
K. Tanaka,
A. Mino,
M. Kikyo,
K. Takahashi,
K. Shimizu, and Y. Takai.
1998.
Rho1p-Bni1p-Spa2p interactions: implication in localization of Bni1p at the bud site and regulation of the actin cytoskeleton in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.
Mol. Biol. Cell
9:1221-1233 |
| 158. |
Fukata, M.,
S. Kuroda,
K. Fujii,
T. Nakamura,
I. Shoji,
Y. Matsuura,
K. Okawa,
A. Iwamatsu,
A. Kikuchi, and K. Kaibuchi.
1997.
Regulation of cross-linking of actin filament by IQGAP1, a target for Cdc42.
J. Biol. Chem.
272:29579-29583 |
| 159. |
Fukui, Y., and M. Yamamoto.
1988.
Isolation and characterization of Schizosaccharomyces pombe mutants phenotypically similar to ras1 .
Mol. Gen. Genet.
215:26-31[Medline].
|
| 160. | Fukumoto, Y., K. Kaibuchi, Y. Hori, H. Fujioka, S. Araki, T. Ueda, A. Kikuchi, and Y. Takai. 1990. Molecular cloning and characterization of a novel type of regulatory protein (GDI) for the rho proteins, ras p21-like small GTP-binding proteins. Oncogene 5:1321-1328[Medline]. |
| 161. |
Galisteo, M. L.,
J. Chernoff,
Y.-C. Su,
E. Y. Skolnik, and J. Schlessinger.
1996.
The adaptor protein Nck links receptor tyrosine kinases with the serine-threonine kinase Pak1.
J. Biol. Chem.
271:20997-21000 |
| 162. |
Gammie, A. E.,
V. Brizzio, and M. D. Rose.
1998.
Distinct morphological phenotypes of cell fusion mutants.
Mol. Biol. Cell
9:1395-1410 |
| 163. | Garrett, M. D., G. N. Major, N. Totty, and A. Hall. 1991. Purification and N-terminal sequence of the p21rho GTPase-activating protein, rho GAP. Biochem. J. 276:833-836[Medline]. |
| 164. |
Garrett, M. D.,
A. J. Self,
C. van Oers, and A. Hall.
1989.
Identification of distinct cytoplasmic targets for ras/R-ras and rho regulatory proteins.
J. Biol. Chem.
264:10-13 |
| 165. |
Gelperin, D.,
J. Weigle,
K. Nelson,
P. Roseboom,
K. Irie,
K. Matsumoto, and S. Lemmon.
1995.
14-3-3 proteins: potential roles in vesicular transport and Ras signaling in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
92:11539-11543 |
| 166. |
Gilbreth, M.,
P. Yang,
D. Wang,
J. Frost,
A. Polverino,
M. H. Cobb, and S. Marcus.
1996.
The highly conserved skb1 gene encodes a protein that interacts with Shk1, a fission yeast Ste20/PAK homolog.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
93:13802-13807 |
| 167. |
Gimeno, C. J., and G. R. Fink.
1992.
The logic of cell division in the life cycle of yeast.
Science
257:626 |
| 168. | Gimeno, C. J., P. O. Ljungdahl, C. A. Styles, and G. R. Fink. 1992. Unipolar cell divisions in the yeast S. cerevisiae lead to filamentous growth: regulation by starvation and RAS. Cell 68:1077-1090[Medline]. |
| 169. |
Gjoerup, O.,
J. Lukas,
J. Bartek, and B. M. Willumsen.
1998.
Rac and Cdc42 are potent stimulators of E2F-dependent transcription capable of promoting retinoblastoma susceptibility gene product hyperphosphorylation.
J. Biol. Chem.
273:18812-18818 |
| 170. | Glotzer, M., and A. A. Hyman. 1995. The importance of being polar. Curr. Biol. 5:1102-1105[Medline]. |
| 171. | Gomez, J., C. Martinez, A. Gonzalez, and A. Rebollo. 1998. Dual role of Ras and Rho proteins: at the cutting edge of life and death. Immunol. Cell Biol. 76:125-134[Medline]. |
| 172. | Gong, T. W. L., J. J. Shin, M. Burmeister, and M. I. Lomax. 1997. Complete cDNAs for CDC42 from chicken cochlea and mouse liver. Biochim. Biophy. Acta Gene Struct. Express. 1352:282-292[Medline]. |
| 173. | Goodman, L. E., C. M. Perou, A. Fujiyama, and F. Tamanoi. 1988. Structure and expression of yeast DPR1, a gene essential for the processing and intracellular localization of ras proteins. Yeast 4:271-281[Medline]. |
| 174. | Gorvel, J. P., T. C. Chang, J. Boretto, T. Azuma, and P. Chavrier. 1998. Differential properties of D4/LyGDI versus RhoGDI: phosphorylation and rho GTPase selectivity. FEBS Lett. 422:269-273[Medline]. |
| 175. | Gosser, Y. Q., T. K. Nomanbhoy, B. Aghazadeh, D. Manor, C. Combs, R. A. Cerione, and M. K. Rosen. 1997. C-terminal binding domain of rho GDP-dissociation inhibitor directs N-terminal inhibitory peptide to GTPases. Nature 387:814-819[Medline]. |
| 176. |
Gould, K. L., and V. Simanis.
1997.
The control of septum formation in fission yeast.
Genes Dev.
11:2939-2951 |
| 177. | Govindan, B., and P. Novick. 1995. Development of cell polarity in budding yeast. J. Exp. Zool. 273:401-424[Medline]. |
| 178. | Graziani, G., D. Ron, A. Eva, and S. K. Srivastava. 1989. The human dbl-proto-oncogene product is a cytoplasmic phosphoprotein which is associated with the cytoskeletal matrix. Oncogene 4:823-829[Medline]. |
| 179. |
Guan, Z. H.,
S. Y. Buckman,
A. P. Pentland,
D. J. Templeton, and A. R. Morrison.
1998.
Induction of cyclooxygenase-2 by the activated MEKK1 SEK1/MKK4 p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase pathway.
J. Biol. Chem.
273:12901-12908 |
| 180. | Guichard, A., E. Bergeret, and R. Griffin-Shea. 1995. Rotund Rac-GAP, p. 261-265. In M. Zerial, and L. A. Huber (ed.), Guidebook to the small GTPases. Oxford University Press, Oxford, United Kingdom. |
| 181. | Guichard, A., E. Bergeret, and R. GriffinShea. 1997. Overexpression of RnRacGAP in Drosophila melanogaster deregulates cytoskeletal organisation in cellularising embryos and induces discrete imaginal phenotypes. Mech. Dev. 61:49-62[Medline]. |
| 182. |
Guillemot, J. C.,
B. A. Kruskal,
C. N. Adra,
S. Zhu,
J. L. Ko,
P. Burch,
K. Nocka,
K. Seetoo,
E. Simons, and B. Lim.
1996.
Targeted disruption of guanosine diphosphate-dissociation inhibitor for Rho-related proteins, GDID4: normal hematopoietic differentiation but subtle defect in superoxide production by macrophages derived from in vitro embryonal stem cell differentiation.
Blood
88:2722-2731 |
| 183. |
Guillemot, J. C.,
P. Montcourrier,
E. Vivier,
J. Davoust, and P. Chavrier.
1997.
Selective control of membrane ruffling and actin plaque assembly by the rho GTPases Rac1 and CDC42 in Fc RI-activated rat basophilic leukemia (RBL-2H3) cells.
J. Cell Sci.
110:2215-2225[Abstract].
|
| 184. | Guinamard, R., P. Aspenström, M. Fougereau, P. Chavrier, and J. C. Guillemot. 1998. Tyrosine phosphorylation of the Wiskott-Aldrich syndrome protein by Lyn and Btk is regulated by CDC42. FEBS Lett. 434:431-436[Medline]. |
| 185. | Guo, W., M. J. Sutcliffe, R. A. Cerione, and R. E. Oswald. 1998. Identification of the binding surface on Cdc42Hs for p21-activated kinase. Biochem. 37:14030-14037[Medline]. |
| 186. | Gutkind, J. S., and L. VitaleCross. 1996. The pathway linking small GTP-binding proteins of the Rho family to cytoskeletal components and novel signaling kinase cascades. Semin. Cell Dev. Biol. 7:683-690. |
| 187. |
Haarer, B. K.,
S. H. Lillie,
A. E. M. Adams,
V. Magdolen,
W. Bandlow, and S. S. Brown.
1990.
Purification of profilin from Saccharomyces cerevisiae and analysis of profilin-deficient cells.
J. Cell Biol.
110:105-114 |
| 188. | Haarer, B. K., A. Petzold, S. H. Lillie, and S. S. Brown. 1994. Identification of MYO4, a second class V myosin gene in yeast. J. Cell Sci. 107:1055-1064[Abstract]. |
| 189. | Habets, G. G. M., E. H. M. Scholtes, D. Zuydgeest, R. A. van der Kammen, J. C. Stam, A. Berns, and J. G. Collard. 1994. Identification of an invasion-inducing gene, Tiam-1, that encodes a protein with homology to GDP-GTP exchangers for Rho-like proteins. Cell 77:537-549[Medline]. |
| 190. |
Hacker, U., and N. Perrimon.
1998.
DRhoGEF2 encodes a member of the Dbl family of oncogenes and controls cell shape changes during gastrulation in Drosophila.
Genes Dev.
12:274-284 |
| 191. |
Hall, A.
1990.
The cellular functions of small GTP-binding proteins.
Science
249:635-640 |
| 192. |
Hall, A.
1998.
Rho GTPases and the actin cytoskeleton.
Science
279:509-514 |
| 193. | Ham, J., C. Babji, J. Whitfield, C. M. Pfarr, D. Lallemand, M. Yaniv, and L. L. Rubin. 1995. A c-Jun dominant negative mutant protects sympathetic neurons against programmed cell death. Neuron 14:927-939[Medline]. |
| 194. |
Han, J.,
J. D. Lee,
L. Bibbs, and R. J. Ulevitch.
1994.
A MAP kinase targeted by endotoxin and hyperosmolarity in mammalian cells.
Science
265:808-811 |
| 195. |
Han, Z. Q. S.,
H. Enslen,
X. D. Hu,
X. J. Meng,
I.-H. Wu,
T. Barrett,
R. J. Davis, and Y. T. Ip.
1998.
A conserved p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase pathway regulates Drosophila immunity gene expression.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
18:3527-3539 |
| 196. | Hancock, J. F., K. Cadwallader, H. Paterson, and C. J. Marshall. 1991. A CAAX or a CAAL motif and a second signal are sufficient for plasma membrane targeting of ras proteins. EMBO J. 10:4033-4039[Medline]. |
| 197. | Hancock, J. F., H. Paterson, and C. J. Marshall. 1990. A polybasic domain or palmitoylation is required in addition to the CAAX motif to localize p21ras to the plasma membrane. Cell 63:133-139[Medline]. |
| 198. | Harden, N., H. Y. Loh, W. Chia, and L. Lim. 1995. A dominant inhibitory version of the small GTP-binding protein Rac disrupts cytoskeletal structures and inhibits developmental cell shape changes in Drosophila. Development 121:903-914[Abstract]. |
| 199. | Harden, N., J. Lee, H.-Y. Loh, Y.-M. Ong, I. Tan, T. Leung, E. Manser, and L. Lim. 1996. A Drosophila homolog of the Rac- and Cdc42-activated serine/threonine kinase PAK is a potential focal adhesion and focal complex protein that colocalizes with dynamic actin structures. Mol. Cell. Biol. 16:1896-1908[Abstract]. |
| 200. | Hardt, W.-D., L.-M. Chen, K. E. Schuebel, X. R. Bustelo, and J. E. Galan. 1998. S. typhimurium encodes an activator of Rho GTPases that induces membrane ruffling and nuclear responses in host cells. Cell 93:815-826[Medline]. |
| 201. | Harlan, J. E., P. J. Hajduk, H. S. Yoon, and S. W. Fesik. 1994. Pleckstrin homology domains bind to phosphatidylinositol-4,5-bisphosphate. Nature 371:168-170[Medline]. |
| 202. | Harold, F. M. 1995. From morphogens to morphogenesis. Microbiology 141:2765-2778[Medline]. |
| 203. | Harris, S. D., L. Hamer, K. E. Sharpless, and J. E. Hamer. 1997. The Aspergillus nidulans sepA gene encodes an FH1/2 protein involved in cytokinesis and the maintenance of cellular polarity. EMBO J. 16:3474-3483[Medline]. |
| 204. | Hart, M. J., M. G. Callow, B. Souza, and P. Polakis. 1996. IQGAP1, a calmodulin-binding protein with a rasGAP-related domain, is a potential effector for cdc42Hs. EMBO J. 15:2997-3005[Medline]. |
| 205. | Hart, M. J., A. Eva, T. Evans, S. A. Aaronson, and R. A. Cerione. 1991. Catalysis of guanine nucleotide exchange on the CDC42Hs protein by the dbl oncogene product. Nature 354:311-314[Medline]. |
| 206. |
Hart, M. J.,
A. Eva,
D. Zangrilli,
S. A. Aaronson,
T. Evans,
R. A. Cerione, and Y. Zheng.
1994.
Cellular transformation and guanine nucleotide exchange activity are catalyzed by a common domain on the dbl oncogene product.
J. Biol. Chem.
269:62-65 |
| 207. |
Hart, M. J.,
X. Jiang,
T. Kozasa,
W. Roscoe,
W. D. Singer,
A. G. Gilman,
P. C. Sternweis, and G. Bollag.
1998.
Direct stimulation of the guanine nucleotide exchange activity of p115 RhoGEF by G 13.
Science
280:2112-2114 |
| 208. |
Hart, M. J.,
Y. Maru,
D. Leonard,
O. N. Witte,
T. Evans, and R. A. Cerione.
1992.
A GDP dissociation inhibitor that serves as a GTPase inhibitor for the Ras-like protein CDC42Hs.
Science
258:812-815 |
| 209. |
Hart, M. J.,
P. G. Polakis,
T. Evans, and R. A. Cerione.
1990.
The identification and characterization of an epidermal growth factor-stimulated phosphorylation of a specific low molecular weight GTP-binding protein in a reconstituted phospholipid vesicle system.
J. Biol. Chem.
265:5990-6001 |
| 210. |
Hart, M. J.,
K. Shinjo,
A. Hall,
T. Evans, and R. A. Cerione.
1991.
Identification of the human platelet GTPase activating protein for the CDC42Hs protein.
J. Biol. Chem.
266:20840-20848 |
| 211. |
Hartwell, L. H.,
J. Culotti,
J. R. Pringle, and B. J. Reid.
1974.
Genetic control of the cell division cycle in yeast. A model to account for the order of cell cycle events is deduced from the phenotypes of yeast mutants.
Science
183:46-51 |
| 212. |
Hartwell, L. H.,
J. Culotti, and B. Reid.
1970.
Genetic control of the cell-division cycle in yeast. I. Detection of mutants.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
66:352-359 |
| 213. | Hartwell, L. H., R. K. Mortimer, J. Culotti, and M. Culotti. 1973. Genetic control of the cell division cycle in yeast. V. Genetic analysis of cdc mutants. Genetics 74:267-286[Abstract]. |
| 214. |
He, B.,
P. Chen,
S. Chen,
K. L. Vancura,
S. Michaelis, and S. Powers.
1991.
RAM2, an essential gene of yeast, and RAM1 encode the two polypeptide components of the farnesyltransferase that prenylates a-factor and Ras proteins.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
88:11373-11377 |
| 215. |
Heisterkamp, N.,
V. Kaartinen,
S. Vansoest,
G. M. Bokoch, and J. Groffen.
1993.
Human ABR encodes a protein with GAP(rac) activity and homology to the DBL nucleotide exchange factor domain.
J. Biol. Chem.
268:16903-16906 |
| 216. | Herskowitz, I. 1997. Building organs and organisms: elements of morphogenesis exhibited by budding yeast. Cold Spring Harbor Symp. Quant. Biol. 62:57-63[Medline]. |
| 217. | Herskowitz, I. 1995. MAP kinase pathways in yeast: for mating and more. Cell 80:187-197[Medline]. |
| 218. | Herskowitz, I., H.-O. Park, S. Sanders, N. Valtz, and M. Peter. 1995. Programming of cell polarity in budding yeast by endogenous and exogenous signals. Cold Spring Harbor Symp. Quant. Biol. 60:717-727[Medline]. |
| 219. | Hildebrand, J. D., J. M. Taylor, and J. T. Parsons. 1996. An SH3 domain-containing GTPase-activating protein for Rho and Cdc42 associates with focal adhesion kinase. Mol. Cell. Biol. 16:3169-3178[Abstract]. |
| 220. | Hill, C. S., J. Wynne, and R. Treisman. 1995. The Rho family GTPases RhoA, Rac1, and CDC42Hs regulate transcriptional activation by SRF. Cell 81:1159-1170[Medline]. |
| 221. | Hirano, H., K. Tanaka, K. Ozaki, H. Imamura, H. Kohno, T. Hihara, T. Kameyama, K. Hotta, M. Arisawa, T. Watanabe, H. Qadota, Y. Ohya, and Y. Takai. 1996. ROM7/BEM4 encodes a novel protein that interacts with the Rho1p small GTP-binding protein in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Cell. Biol. 16:4396-4403[Abstract]. |
| 222. |
Hooley, R.,
C.-Y. Yu,
M. Symons, and D. L. Barber.
1996.
G 13 stimulates Na+-H+ exchange through distinct Cdc42-dependent and RhoA-dependent pathways.
J. Biol. Chem.
271:6152-6158 |
| 223. |
Hordijk, P. L.,
J. P. ten Klooster,
R. A. van der Kammen,
F. Michiels,
L. C. J. M. Oomen, and J. G. Collard.
1997.
Inhibition of invasion of epithelial cells by Tiam1-Rac signaling.
Science
278:1464-1466 |
| 224. | Horii, Y., J. F. Beeler, K. Sakaguchi, M. Tachibana, and T. Miki. 1994. A novel oncogene, ost, encodes a guanine nucleotide exchange factor that potentially links Rho and Rac signaling pathways. EMBO J. 13:4776-4786[Medline]. |
| 225. | Hotchin, N. A., and A. Hall. 1996. Regulation of the actin cytoskeleton, integrins and cell growth by the Rho family of small GTPases. Cancer Surv. 27:311-322[Medline]. |
| 226. | Hu, K. Q., and J. Settleman. 1997. Tandem SH2 binding sites mediate the RasGAP-RhoGAP interaction: a conformational mechanism for SH3 domain regulation. EMBO J. 16:473-483[Medline]. |
| 227. | Hu, M. C. T., W. R. Qiu, and Y. P. Wang. 1997. JNK1, JNK2 and JNK3 are p53 N-terminal serine 34 kinases. Oncogene 15:2277-2287[Medline]. |
| 228. |
Huang, S.,
C. S. Chen, and D. E. Ingber.
1998.
Control of cyclin D1, p27Kip1, and cell cycle progression in human capillary endothelial cells by cell shape and cytoskeletal tension.
Mol. Biol. Cell
9:3179-3193 |
| 229. | Hynes, R. O., and A. D. Lander. 1992. Contact and adhesive specificities in the associations, migrations, and targeting of cells and axons. Cell 68:303-322[Medline]. |
| 230. |
Ichijo, H.,
E. Nishida,
K. Irie,
P. ten Dijke,
M. Saitoh,
T. Moriguchi,
M. Takagi,
K. Matsumoto,
K. Miyazono, and Y. Gotoh.
1997.
Induction of apoptosis by ASK1, a mammalian MAPKKK that activates SAPK/JNK and p38 signaling pathways.
Science
275:90-94 |
| 231. | Iino, Y., and M. Yamamoto. 1998. Expression pattern of the C. elegans p21-activated protein kinase, CePAK. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 245:177-184[Medline]. |
| 232. | Imamura, H., K. Tanaka, T. Hihara, M. Umikawa, T. Kamei, K. Takahashi, T. Sasaki, and Y. Takai. 1997. Bni1p and Bnr1p: downstream targets of the Rho family small G-proteins which interact with profilin and regulate actin cytoskeleton in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. EMBO J. 16:2745-2755[Medline]. |
| 233. |
Ip, Y. T., and R. J. Davis.
1998.
Signal transduction by the c-Jun N-terminal kinase (JNK) from inflammation to development.
Curr. Opin. Cell Biol.
10:205-219[Medline].
|
| 234. | Ireton, K., and P. Cossart. 1998. Interaction of invasive bacteria with host signaling pathways. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 10:276-283[Medline]. |
| 235. |
Jakobi, R.,
C. J. Chen,
P. T. Tuazon, and J. A. Traugh.
1996.
Molecular cloning and sequencing of the cytostatic G protein-activated protein kinase PAK1.
J. Biol. Chem.
271:6206-6211 |
| 236. | Jansen, R.-P., C. Dowzer, C. Michaelis, M. Galova, and K. Nasmyth. 1996. Mother cell-specific HO expression in budding yeast depends on the unconventional myosin Myo4p and other cytoplasmic proteins. Cell 84:687-697[Medline]. |
| 237. | Jaquenoud, M., M. P. Gulli, K. Peter, and M. Peter. 1998. The Cdc42p effector Gic2p is targeted for ubiquitin-dependent degradation by the SCFGrr1 complex. EMBO J. 17:5360-5373[Medline]. |
| 238. | Jefferies, H. B. J., and G. Thomas. 1996. Ribosomal protein S6 phosphorylation and signal transduction, p. 389-409. In J. W. B. Hershey, M. B. Mathews, and N. Sonenberg (ed.), Translational control. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y. |
| 239. | Johnson, D. I. 1993. CDC42: a member of the ras superfamily involved in the control of cellular polarity during the Saccharomyces cerevisiae cell cycle, p. 297-312. In J. C. Lacal, and F. McCormick (ed.), The ras superfamily of GTPases. CRC Press, Inc., Boca Raton, Fla. |
| 240. | Johnson, D. I., J. M. O'Brien, and C. W. Jacobs. 1991. Isolation and sequence analysis of CDC43, a gene involved in the control of cell polarity in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Gene 98:149-150[Medline]. |
| 241. | Johnson, D. I., and J. R. Pringle. 1995. Cdc42p, p. 283-287. In M. Zerial, and L. A. Huber (ed.), Guidebook to the small GTPases. Oxford University Press, Oxford, United Kingdom. |
| 242. |
Johnson, D. I., and J. R. Pringle.
1990.
Molecular characterization of CDC42, a Saccharomyces cerevisiae gene involved in the development of cell polarity.
J. Cell Biol.
111:143-152 |
| 243. |
Joyal, J. L.,
R. S. Annan,
Y. D. Ho,
M. E. Huddleston,
S. A. Carr,
M. J. Hart, and D. B. Sacks.
1997.
Calmodulin modulates the interaction between IQGAP1 and Cdc42. Identification of IQGAP1 by nanoelectrospray tandem mass spectrometry.
J. Biol. Chem.
272:15419-15425 |
| 244. |
Jullien-Flores, V.,
O. Dorseuil,
F. Romero,
F. Letourneur,
S. Saragosti,
R. Berger,
A. Tavitian,
G. Gacon, and J. H. Camonis.
1995.
Bridging Ral GTPases to Rho pathways. RLIP76, a Ral effector with CDC42/Rac GTPase-activating protein activity.
J. Biol. Chem.
270:22473-22477 |
| 245. | Juo, P., C. J. Kuo, S. E. Reynolds, R. F. Konz, J. Raingeaud, R. J. Davis, H.-P. Biemann, and J. Blenis. 1997. Fas activation of the p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase signalling pathway requires ICE/CED-3 family proteases. Mol. Cell. Biol. 17:24-35[Abstract]. |
| 246. | Jurgens, G., M. Grebe, and T. Steinmann. 1997. Establishment of cell polarity during early plant development. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 9:849-852[Medline]. |
| 247. | Just, I., J. Selzer, M. Wilm, C. V. Eichel-Streiber, M. Mann, and K. Aktories. 1995. Glucosylation of Rho proteins by Clostridium difficile toxin B. Nature 375:500-503[Medline]. |
| 248. |
Kaga, S.,
S. Ragg,
K. A. Rogers, and A. Ochi.
1998.
Activation of p21-CDC42/Rac-activated kinases by CD28 signaling: p21-activated kinase (PAK) and MEK kinase 1 (MEKK1) may mediate the interplay between CD3 and CD28 signals.
J. Immunol.
160:4182-4189 |
| 249. |
Kaga, S.,
S. Ragg,
K. A. Rogers, and A. Ochi.
1998.
Stimulation of CD28 with B7-2 promotes focal adhesion-like cell contacts where Rho family small G proteins accumulate in T cells.
J. Immunol.
160:24-27 |
| 250. | Kahn, R. A. 1998. PIP2: activator ... or terminator of small G proteins? Trends Biochem. Sci. 23:99. (Response.) |
| 251. |
Kamada, Y.,
H. Qadota,
C. P. Python,
Y. Anraku,
Y. Ohya, and D. E. Levin.
1996.
Activation of yeast protein kinase C by Rho1 GTPase.
J. Biol. Chem.
271:9193-9196 |
| 252. |
Kamei, T.,
K. Tanaka,
T. Hihara,
M. Umikawa,
H. Imamura,
M. Kikyo,
K. Ozaki, and Y. Takai.
1998.
Interaction of Bnr1p with a novel Src homology 3 domain-containing Hof1p. Implication in cytokinesis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.
J. Biol. Chem.
273:28341-28345 |
| 253. |
Karin, M.
1995.
The regulation of AP-1 activity by mitogen-activated protein kinases.
J. Biol. Chem.
270:16483-16486 |
| 254. | Kater, S. B., and V. Rehder. 1995. The sensory role of growth cone filopodia. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 5:68-74[Medline]. |
| 255. |
Katoh, H.,
J. Aoki,
Y. Yamaguchi,
Y. Kitano,
A. Ichikawa, and M. Negishi.
1998.
Constitutively active G 12, G 13, and G q induce Rho-dependent neurite retraction through different signaling pathways.
J. Biol. Chem.
273:28700-28707 |
| 256. | Keely, P. J., J. K. Westwick, I. P. Whitehead, C. J. Der, and L. V. Parise. 1997. Cdc42 and Rac1 induce integrin-mediated cell motility and invasiveness through PI(3)K. Nature 390:632-636[Medline]. |
| 257. |
Kenny, D.,
L. Cairns,
E. Remold-O'Donnell,
J. Peterson,
F. S. Rosen, and R. Parkman.
1986.
Morphological abnormalities in the lymphocytes of patients with the Wiskott-Aldrich syndrome.
Blood
68:1329-1332 |
| 258. | Khosravi-Far, R., P. A. Solski, G. J. Clark, M. S. Kinch, and C. J. Der. 1995. Activation of Rac1, RhoA, and mitogen-activated protein kinases is required for Ras transformation. Mol. Cell. Biol. 15:6443-6453[Abstract]. |
| 259. |
Kilmartin, J. V., and A. E. M. Adams.
1984.
Structural rearrangements of tubulin and actin during the cell cycle of the yeast Saccharomyces.
J. Cell Biol.
98:922-933 |
| 260. |
Kim, H. B.,
B. K. Haarer, and J. R. Pringle.
1991.
Cellular morphogenesis in the Saccharomyces cerevisiae cell cycle: localization of the CDC3 gene product and the timing of events at the budding site.
J. Cell Biol.
112:535-544 |
| 261. | Kirchhausen, T., and F. S. Rosen. 1996. Disease mechanism: unravelling Wiskott-Aldrich syndrome. Curr. Biol. 6:676-678[Medline]. |
| 262. |
Kishi, K.,
T. Sasaki,
S. Kuroda,
T. Itoh, and Y. Takai.
1993.
Regulation of cytoplasmic division of Xenopus embryo by rho p21 and its inhibitory GDP/GTP exchange protein (rho GDI).
J. Cell Biol.
120:1187-1195 |
| 263. | Kitamura, Y., T. Kitamura, H. Sakaue, T. Maeda, H. Ueno, S. Nishio, S. Ohno, S. Osada, M. Sakaue, W. Ogawa, and M. Kasuga. 1997. Interaction of Nck-associated protein 1 with activated GTP-binding protein Rac. Biochem. J. 322:873-878[Medline]. |
| 264. | Knaus, U. G., and G. M. Bokoch. 1998. The p21Rac/Cdc42-activated kinases (PAKs). Int. J. Biochem. Cell Biol. 30:857-862[Medline]. |
| 265. |
Knaus, U. G.,
S. Morris,
H.-J. Dong,
J. Chernoff, and G. M. Bokoch.
1995.
Regulation of human leukocyte p21-activated kinases through G protein-coupled receptors.
Science
269:221-223 |
| 266. |
Knaus, U. G.,
Y. Wang,
A. M. Reilly,
D. Warnock, and J. H. Jackson.
1998.
Structural requirements for PAK activation by Rac GTPases.
J. Biol. Chem.
273:21512-21518 |
| 267. | Koch, G., K. Tanaka, T. Masuda, W. Yamochi, H. Nonaka, and Y. Takai. 1997. Association of the Rho family small GTP-binding proteins with Rho GDP dissociation inhibitor (Rho GDI) in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Oncogene 15:417-422[Medline]. |
| 268. |
Kohler, J. R., and G. R. Fink.
1996.
Candida albicans strains heterozygous and homozygous for mutations in mitogen-activated protein kinase signaling components have defects in hyphal development.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
93:13223-13228 |
| 269. | Kohno, H., K. Tanaka, A. Mino, M. Umikawa, H. Imamura, T. Fujiwara, Y. Fujita, K. Hotta, H. Qadota, T. Watanabe, Y. Ohya, and Y. Takai. 1996. Bni1p implicated in cytoskeletal control is a putative target of Rho1p small GTP binding protein in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. EMBO J. 15:6060-6068[Medline]. |
| 270. |
Kolluri, R.,
A. Shehabeldin,
M. Peacocke,
A. M. Lamhonwah,
K. Teichert-Kuliszewska,
S. M. Weissman, and K. A. Siminovitch.
1995.
Identification of WASP mutations in patients with Wiskott-Aldrich syndrome and isolated thrombocytopenia reveals allelic heterogeneity at the WAS locus.
Hum. Mol. Genet.
4:1119-1126 |
| 271. |
Kolluri, R.,
K. F. Tolias,
C. L. Carpenter,
F. S. Rosen, and T. Kirchhausen.
1996.
Direct interaction of the Wiskott-Aldrich syndrome protein with the GTPase Cdc42.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
93:5615-5618 |
| 272. |
Kondoh, O.,
Y. Tachibana,
Y. Ohya,
M. Arisawa, and T. Watanabe.
1997.
Cloning of the RHO1 gene from Candida albicans and its regulation of -1,3-glucan synthesis.
J. Bacteriol.
179:7734-7741 |
| 273. | Kowluru, A., G. D. Li, M. E. Rabaglia, V. B. Segu, F. Hofmann, K. Aktories, and S. A. Metz. 1997. Evidence for differential roles of the Rho subfamily of GTP-binding proteins in glucose- and calcium-induced insulin secretion from pancreatic beta cells. Biochem. Pharmacol. 54:1097-1108[Medline]. |
| 274. |
Kowluru, A.,
S. E. Seavey,
G. Li,
R. L. Sorenson,
A. J. Weinhaus,
R. Nesher,
M. E. Rabaglia,
J. Vadakekalam, and S. A. Metz.
1996.
Glucose- and GTP-dependent stimulation of the carboxyl methylation of CDC42 in rodent and human pancreatic islets and pure cells. Evidence for an essential role of GFP-binding proteins in nutrient-induced insulin secretion.
J. Clin. Invest.
98:540-555 |
| 275. |
Kozasa, T.,
X. Jiang,
M. J. Hart,
P. M. Sternweis,
W. D. Singer,
A. G. Gilman,
G. Bollag, and P. C. Sternweis.
1998.
p115 RhoGEF, a GTPase activating protein for G 12 and G 13.
Science
280:2109-2111 |
| 276. | Kozma, R., S. Ahmed, A. Best, and L. Lim. 1996. The GTPase-activating protein n-chimaerin cooperates with Rac1 and Cdc42Hs to induce the formation of lamellipodia and filopodia. Mol. Cell. Biol. 16:5069-5080[Abstract]. |
| 277. | Kozma, R., S. Ahmed, A. Best, and L. Lim. 1995. The Ras-related p |