Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews, December 2002, p. 617-629, Vol. 66, No. 4
1092-2172/02/$04.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/MMBR.66.4.617-629.2002
Copyright © 2002, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
IRIS Research Center, Chiron SpA, 53100 Siena, Italy
SUMMARY INTRODUCTION RATIONALE FOR BACTERIAL ADHESINS AND RECEPTINS INTERPLAY OF H. PYLORI VIRULENCE FACTORS RESULTING IN CELL DAMAGE SERUM PROTEINS BINDING TO H. PYLORI Immunoglobulin Albumin EXTRACELLULAR MATRIX COMPONENTS Heparin and Heparan Sulfate Fibronectin and Fibrinogen Collagen Laminin Plasminogen and Plasmin Vitronectin CONCLUDING REMARKS ACKNOWLEDGMENTS REFERENCES
|
|
|---|
|
|
|---|
The majority of infections are acquired early in life, probably in childhood from close contact with parents (most probably from the mother) or other children (23, 52, 85, 97). In fact, the major risk factors for acquisition of this long-lasting infection in all countries are childhood and low socioeconomic status. The observed differences in the prevalence of the infection are probably related to hygiene conditions and sanitation (70).
H. pylori infection is associated with chronic gastritis, peptic ulcers, atrophic gastritis, intestinal metaplasia, gastric adenomas, gastric hyperplastic polyps, adenocarcinomas of the distal part of the stomach, and lymphomas of mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue (29, 33, 46, 61, 70, 74, 91). These diseases, in most instances, develop many years after the host colonization.
The sequences of the entire genomes of two unrelated pathogenic strains of H. pylori (J99 and 26695) have been reported (1, 98). This work demonstrated that even though the chromosomes are organized differently in a limited number of discrete regions, the genome size, genetic content, and gene order of the two strains examined are surprisingly conserved (35).
To date, numerous virulence factors responsible for gastric colonization, survival, and tissue damage have been described and characterized for H. pylori (for a review, see reference 65) (Table 1). The critical feature of H. pylori may, however, reside not in its ability to damage host tissues but rather in its special ability to persist within the host for such a long period. Many of the pathogenic events seen during H. pylori infection may be due to the alteration of the host response by the bacterium. This explains why H. pylori flourishes in the human stomach despite an important local immune response and can restore colonization with only few bacteria surviving after failure of therapeutic eradication. Underscoring the virulence of microbial pathogens is their capacity for adaptation and survival in variable and often hostile environments encountered in the host.
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 1. Virulence factors of H. pyloria
|
In this review, we focus on the interaction (specific and less specific) of cell surface molecules of H. pylori with soluble serum proteins and extracellular matrix (ECM) proteins, of which many are also present in host serum, of the human host with which the bacterium comes into contact once the tissues have been damaged through the action of toxic factors.
We know that H. pylori binds host proteins (immunoglobulin, albumin, heparin, etc.) and that some of these interactions are of high affinity: they could thus play an important role in the infectious process. Microbial proteins with binding properties for mammalian proteins are now called receptins (41), and this term is used throughout this review. This term excludes the first step of adherence to the mammalian cell surface required for a microorganism to establish itself in a host; rather, it refers to the later stages that permit the persistence of a long-lasting infectious process through binding to soluble host cell proteins. Thus, this interplay of binding of H. pylori with host proteins represents a way to adapt to an evolving infection and to evade the host immunological response, which would normally tend to establish protective immunity. This review summarizes current knowledge of H. pylori binding to serum and ECM proteins and on the biological significance of these interactions during the infectious process.
|
|
|---|
H. pylori has evolved adherence and colonization mechanisms to maintain itself specifically in the gastric mucosa. It is highly adaptable, as evidenced by the fact that it can infect a host for decades. It can physically interact with host cells and mucins via a number of different adhesins displaying a variety of unique receptor specificities (for a review, see reference 95). The adherence to gastric epithelial cells is readily demonstrated in tissue culture and in gastric biopsy specimens. It is noteworthy that H. pylori possesses a fibrillar hemagglutinin that binds to N-acetlyneuraminyl-(alpha-2-3)-lactose (95). This property permits us to divide H. pylori strains into hemagglutinating and non-hemagglutinating strains (28).
The bacteria following an oral infection probably reach the stomach covered with salivary mucins containing both sialylated and sulfated components that are known to bind to H. pylori (60). After ingestion, H. pylori colonizes the human gastric mucus and epithelium by several specific adhesins (95). No cell invasin has been identified for H. pylori, and most researchers agree that cell invasion is a rare event (9, 12), although a very recent in vitro study suggested that H. pylori is able to invade cultured gastric epithelial cells via a zipper-like mechanism (43). This microorganism seems, rather, to gain access to the submucosal layer by passing through the intercellular tight junctions (107). The process is probably facilitated by expression of binding molecules for host serum and ECM proteins after gastric cell lesions are induced by ammonia as a result of urease activity and H. pylori toxins (107). It is likely that H. pylori uses binding to one or more of these ECM and/or serum proteins to penetrate the intercellular junctions of gastric epithelial cells. These adherence-penetration phenomena also involve coating with host proteins to escape the immune system and initiate a chronic lifelong infection (107). In addition, H. pylori cells coat themselves with host molecules to prevent attacks by professional phagocytes and strong immune reactions and to promote colonization and survival in the host. Thus, microbial receptins as such represent an attractive target for the development of new antimicrobial therapeutics.
|
|
|---|
Briefly, from what we know now of the pathogenesis of this microorganism, H. pylori enters the gastric lumen and, through its urease activity, survives in this highly acidic, hostile environment. Ammonia molecules are produced that buffer the acidic pH (38). Because of the helical shape, the bacterium is efficiently propelled through the mucus layer, covering the gastric epithelium, via polar sheated flagella (72, 73). Reaching the apex of the gastric epithelial cells, it sticks to them through specialized adhesins (95). CagA protein is then injected into the host cells by using a type IV secretion system (18). CagA is part of a pathogenicity island (PAI) and is associated with type I strains, which are responsible for severe forms of gastroduodenal disease (13). Other toxic factors are released as well, including NAP and VacA. VacA induces alterations of the tight junctions and formation of vacuoles (20, 21); it was recently shown to promote urea diffusion across the epithelia, possibly favoring H. pylori infectivity in vivo by optimizing urease activity (99). NAP crosses the epithelial lining and recruits neutrophils, monocytes, and mast cells, causing tissue damage through the release of oxygen radicals and other factors (67, 88). Injection of CagA causes cell cytoskeleton alteration and pedestal formation and signals the nucleus to release proinflammatory lymphokines. Taken together, the direct toxic activities of VacA and of the oxygen radicals and the proinflammatory activity and indirect activities mediated by other bacterial molecules lead to tissue damage that is enhanced by loosening of the protective mucus layer and acid permeation.
The interplay of H. pylori virulence factors leads to host tissue damage that exposes the ECM proteins as well as serum proteins with which the bacterium can now come into contact. H. pylori causes chronic infection during which several mechanisms lead to damage of the epithelial cell integrity. At different stages of the infection process, it is expected that the bacterium interacts with serum and ECM proteins which would otherwise be "hidden" from the pathogen. These additional interactions would be responsible for an even more complex dynamic between the bacterium and the host, causing a lifelong persistence of the infection.
|
|
|---|
Tosi and Czinn (100) reported that binding of IgG to H. pylori promoted phagocytosis and killing in vitro by polymorphonuclear leukocytes. H. pylori strains are susceptible to complement and activate either the classical pathway, even in the absence of specific antibodies, or the alternative pathway (7, 32). Nevertheless, most patients with chronic active type B gastritis show a high titer of specific antibodies to H. pylori yet fail to resolve the infection. Mattsson et al. (56) demonstrated that in H. pylori infection, a strong antibody response is generated in the gastric mucosa both in asymptomatic carriers and in patients with duodenal ulcer. No difference in either antigen specificity or magnitude of the B-cell response in the stomach could be detected in these two groups of subjects. Thus, H. pylori seems capable of evading host opsonic phagocytosis mechanisms in vivo. Even though those individuals develop a seemingly vigorous humoral response to the infection, they do not eliminate the bacteria. This is why we now think that a vaccination strategy against this pathogen needs to be capable of stimulating cellular immunity (26). Reasons for this observation may be that H. pylori either could react in a nonimmune way with Igs, thus affecting the normal opsonization process, or could enzymatically degrade the specific Igs produced in response to the infection.
In a descriptive study, Amini et al. (3), using a particle agglutination assay in which IgG was immobilized on latex beads, indicated that H. pylori strains commonly expressed IgG-binding proteins, since 24 of the 32 strains studied had bound human IgG. In a subsequent investigation, the protein that was binding human IgG in a nonimmune way was identified as a 60-kDa cell surface-associated heat shock protein (Hsp) (2). This protein could bind human IgG1, IgG3 and IgM. Binding was inhibited by the kappa chain of human IgG but not by the Fc fragment, suggesting that the interaction occurs through the Fab region of the IgG molecule. No reaction was noted with human IgA, rabbit IgG, or mouse IgG. Thus, the characteristics of the H. pylori IgG-binding activity seem to differ from those of Staphylococcus and Streptococcus species (11).
The uptake of host Igs by bacterial strains expressing IgG-binding proteins may, in theory, interfere with the defense mechanisms. This reaction at the cell surface of the pathogen could influence the coexistence of the host and the parasite and may help the microorganism to evade the host defense by a mechanism of molecular mimicry (37). In addition, Hsp60, identified as the Ig-binding protein in H. pylori, represents a family of heat shock proteins that are immunodominant antigens of many microbial pathogens that could induce immune tolerance in the host (80).
Immunization with H. pylori heat shock proteins induces protective immunity in a murine model of Helicobacter felis infection (30). Since H. pylori Hsp does not bind mouse IgG, in contrast to human IgG, as demonstrated by Amini et al. (2), one could hypothesize that in this animal model, protection is achieved through the specific immune responses and interactions between the Hsp and the specific binding sites of the antibodies induced. In contrast, natural infection of humans with Helicobacter is able to establish itself and be maintained as a persistent infection despite the production of antibodies to a number of H. pylori proteins, including Hsp (45, 51). This is probably because of the higher propensity of Hsp to bind to Igs in a nonimmune manner.
One other conceivable mechanism to elude the antibody-mediated protection could be due to the direct alteration of the Igs produced by the host in response to the invading pathogen. A study by Berstad et al. (8) of the mucosal production of IgA in response to H. pylori gastritis reported that a substantial increase in the number of Ig-producing cells occurred, particularly of the IgA1 isotype. H. pylori did not produce IgA1-specific or nonspecific IgA-degrading protease activity, ruling out the hypothesis that H. pylori is capable of enzymatically degrading IgA. Nevertheless, a recent study showed that an unidentified cell wall protein of H. pylori was reported to bind enzymatically deglycosylated human IgG (55). The IgG of patients infected with H. pylori also bound to this protein and consequently lost the reactivity of the sugar chain structure. These observations suggested to the authors that H. pylori infection was related to human IgG deglycosylation.
An exploratory investigation using human and bovine serum albumin immobilized on latex beads was conducted. Of the 32 strains of H. pylori tested, 16 could interact with bovine serum albumin and 12 could react with human serum albumin (3). This binding was probably due to nonspecific and hydrophobic interactions, since the binding was inhibited by chaotropic agents. In addition, the albumin-binding activity could not be extracted from the bacterial surface by using either glycine buffer or phosphate buffer or by sonication. Nevertheless, the hydrophobic interaction of albumin and H. pylori could have implications in the pathogenesis process. In fact, covering H. pylori with albumin found in serum could help the microbe to evade the defense mechanisms of the host by a mimicry stratagem. In addition, we cannot exclude the possibility that albumin, as a major transport protein, could, after binding to bacterial surface, provide substances to be used by the bacterium as nutrients in a similar manner to that suggested to occur in group G streptococci (89). It is not yet clear, however, why some H. pylori strains bind albumin better than others and whether this is associated with an increased virulence. In vivo experiments should be conducted to answer these intriguing questions.
|
|
|---|
Interaction of microorganisms with ECM could play an important role in the establishment and maintenance of long-lasting deep tissue infection. Whether the infection remains superficial or proceeds into subepithelial tissues depends on the strain characteristics as well as the host immune response. Bacteria come in contact with the ECM after either physical or chemical alterations have occurred and proteolytic enzymes and/or toxins have disrupted the skin or epithelial integrity. The normal shedding of epithelia (18 to 24 h for gastric epithelium) could also expose ECM components. Coating of bacterial cells with some of the molecules exposed could represent a mechanism to evade host immune defense mechanisms, for example.
Expression of receptins for various ECM components is influenced by bacterial culture conditions and may appear at different stages of growth. For example, H. pylori expresses ECM-binding molecules during the stationary phase of growth. For specific ECM molecules, it was observed that both coccoidal and spiral forms of the organism express binding to a similar extent (39). When studying the interactions of bacteria with the ECM, it is important to grow the bacteria under in vivo-like conditions since pH, redox potential, divalent cations, and iron availability could represent important factors for their expression (49). A large number of intracellular and extracellular human pathogens adhere to the mammalian ECM and have been shown to contribute to the virulence of the microorganisms (77, 110).
H. pylori was screened for binding to the ECM components heparan sulfate and heparin (5). Heparan sulfate could bind H. pylori strains isolated from patients with gastroduodenal ulcer-related diseases. Of the 20 strains studied, 90% bound 125I-heparan sulfate. Another study using H. pylori strain CCUG 17874 and strain 25 indicated high-level binding of 125I-labeled heparin (108). This common property involves a protein receptor-ligand binding interaction. The low binding at high pH (pH 8) and high binding at low pH (pH 4), as well as the binding inhibition at high ionic strength (2 M NaCl), suggested that charge interactions were important for optimal binding. The observations that pepsin treatment of H. pylori did not affect the capacity for binding to heparan sulfate and that binding had a low pH optimum (pH 4 to 5) could be significant in the pathogenesis of the gastric infection caused by H. pylori. This is because in vivo, the pepsin and acidic pH found in the gastric environment of H. pylori may not interfere with binding to heparan sulfate. This interaction was inhibited by various sulfated polysaccharides at high ionic strength and high pH but was not inhibited by carboxylated or nonsulfated compounds (36). The inhibition was related to the sulfate content of the molecule but was not related to the carbohydrate polymer backbone.
Utt and Wadström (103) confirmed that binding of heparan sulfate by H. pylori at pH 4 to 6 is very common among H. pylori strains. As the previous study had indicated, inhibitory assays with various compounds such as dextran sulfate and carrageenans revealed that inhibition was related to the sulfate content of the molecule, not to the carbohydrate polymer backbone. The calculated 50% inhibitory concentration (IC50) was 3.55 x 10-7 M heparin and 5.01 x 10-6 M dextran sulfate, respectively, for H. pylori strain 25. The heparin-binding protein is located at the cell surface, as revealed by biotinylation of cell surface proteins and an indirect-immunofluorescence assay; it could correspond to a polypeptide of 55 to 60 kDa.
Proteins with heparan sulfate affinity were recently isolated from H. pylori culture supernatants by affinity chromatography on heparin-Sepharose (86). Two major extracellular proteins with heparan sulfate affinity were identified by preparative isoelectrofocusing, sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis, and blotting experiments using peroxidase-labeled heparan sulfate. One protein had a molecular mass of 66.2 kDa and a pI of 5.4, while the other was a 71.5-kDa protein with a pI of 5.0. NH2-terminal amino acid sequencing was performed on those proteins. The 66.2-kDa heparan sulfate-binding molecule showed a high homology to Escherichia coli chaperon proteine and equine hemoglobin. A third protein binding heparan sulfate was isolated from an outer membrane protein fraction of H. pylori and shown to have a molecular mass of 47.2 kDa.
Utt et al. (102) reported that the C-terminal domain of the 58-kDa subunit of H. pylori VacA was also binding to heparin and heparan sufate. Using surface plasmon resonance and synthetic VacA toxin peptides corresponding to predicted binding peptides as inferred by using bioinformatic tools, they showed that heparan sulfate might represent a receptor/coreceptor for VacA cytotoxin. These findings supported an earlier study indicating that the binding site for the toxin receptor is located in the 58-kDa C-terminal domain (81). Although the observed binding has moderate affinity (Ka = 4.89 x 105 M-1), the multimeric form of VacA cytotoxin may bind heparan sulfate through several domains and hence may contribute to a much stronger interaction. Experiments using cells in culture showed that inhibition of cell vacuolation was observed following treatment of H. pylori cells with heparin (92), confirming the surface plasmon resonance study.
As a pathogenic mechanism, H. pylori could also interfere with growth factors and growth factor receptors important for the gastroduodenal mucosa integrity. In fact, Ascencio et al. (6) demonstrated that H. pylori not only binds to heparin-binding fibroblast growth factors (FGFs) with an extremely strong affinity (Kd = 3.8 x 10-12 M), but also could bind to heparan sulfate and heparin with higher affinity (9 x 10-9 M) (Table 2) than FGFs bind to heparin (10-8 to 10-9 M) (Fig. 1). H. pylori binds two heparin-binding growth factors (i.e., acidic and basic FGFs). Heparan sulfate-binding proteins are exposed on the surface of the microbe as well as it is shed from the surface; they are often localized close to epithelial stem cells in the gastroduodenal glands (5). Since FGFs are dependent on heparin for activation, H. pylori could efficiently interfere with growth factors and growth factor receptors, resulting in disturbances of the balance controlling the renewal, maintenance, and repair of the gastroduodenal mucosa, which are commonly observed during H. pylori infections. The high binding affinity to heparin and heparan sulfate of H. pylori could reduce the availability of FGF and result in its injurious effect on the human mucosa by inhibitory or repressive effects on the renewal and differentiation of gastroduodenal epithelial cells as well as the restoration of the tissue after damage. Heparin-binding proteins could play a role in the development of peptic ulcers by interfering with the availability and bioactivity of heparin-binding growth factors as well as of heparan sulfate.
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 2. Host serum and ECM proteins shown to bind H. pylori cells in vitro, the receptins involved, and the affinity of the interaction
|
![]() View larger version (9K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 1. Comparison of the dissociation constant between H. pylori, acidic FGF (aFGF), and heparan sulfate or heparin. Adapted from reference 6.
|
Despite recruitment of numerous phagocytes to the inflammatory foci in the gastric mucosa, infected people are unable to eliminate the bacteria. It has been established that strains expressing heparan sulfate-binding proteins interact with phagocytes via those molecules (15, 17). Human and murine neutrophils and macrophages seem to recognize mainly the hemagglutinins on the surface of H. pylori strains and also heparan sulfate-binding proteins on other strains (16). Treatment of H. pylori with heparin caused a dramatic decrease in phagocytosis, probably due to a decrease of the surface hydrophobicity (14). Preincubation of the bacteria with heparin inhibited the ingestion process by 55 to 70%. Deposition of sialic acid-containing compounds, heparin, and vitronectin in the presence of complement on the bacterial surface rendered the bacteria resistant to phagocytosis (14). It is probable that in an inflamed tissue, binding of these compounds by H. pylori allows the bacteria to avoid phagocytosis.
Duensing et al. (24) describe a novel, extragenomic mechanism of bacterial surface modulation that could amplify the adaptive and pathogenic potential of numerous bacterial species, including H. pylori. The mechanism described involved specific bacterial recruitment of molecules found in the immediate environment during the infection process, such as heparin, glycosaminoglycans, and related sulfated polysaccharides. These molecules could then serve as universal binding sites for a diverse array of mammalian heparin-binding proteins. The recruited molecules could bind to adhesive glycoproteins (vitronectin and fibronectin), inflammatory (monocyte chemotactic protein 3, platelet factor 4, and macrophage inflammatory protein 1
), and immunomodulatory (gamma interferon) factors, and FGF. A study by Ascencio et al. (6) had clearly shown that preincubation of H. pylori cells with heparan sulfate and other sulfated polysaccharides resulted in enhanced FGF binding, supporting the novel microbial pathogenesis strategy proposed by Duensing et al. (24). This strategy may have a major impact on key aspects of microbial pathogenicity, as revealed by the observed increase in bacterial invasion of epithelial cells and inhibition of chemokine-induced chemotaxis (24).
Collagen is a major protein of the ECM. Type IV collagen forms a two-dimensional reticulum and is a major component of the basal lamina. Type IV collagen binds at high levels to H. pylori (average binding, 27%; highest binding, 60%), while the bacterium is also capable of binding low levels of type I and II collagens (101). The ability of 16 isolates of H. pylori to bind125I-collagen was quantitated using a liquid- phase assay. Results showed that binding is rapid, not affected by pH, and saturable, indicating a limited number of receptors. The number of available binding sites on the bacterial surface was calculated to be approximately 3,000. Once bound, radiolabeled type IV collagen was not displaced by an excess of unlabeled molecule, indicating that the interaction was of high affinity (Kd = 16 nM). The ability to specifically bind to this component of the basement membrane is likely to represent an important virulence property for this gastric pathogen. The molecule(s) responsible for the interaction with collagen has not been identified yet.
In a study by Valkonen et al. (104), N-acetylneuraminyllactose decreased laminin binding by 70% and neuraminidase treatment of laminin decrease binding by 50%, while a recombinant B1 chain of laminin, containing high-mannose-type oligosaccharides, inhibited binding by only 25%, suggesting that terminal sialic acids on laminin were competing for a specific sugar-binding protein on H. pylori cells. The receptor involved in this binding appeared to be proteinaceous since it was heat and protease sensitive. Scatchard analysis of specific binding indicated that approximately 2,000 sites per cell were present (104). The interaction of H. pylori with laminin involves a bacterial receptin recognizing certain sialylated oligosaccharides of the glycoprotein (105). Since the carbohydrate moiety of laminin is thought to play a role in eukaryotic cellular adhesion processes such an interaction of H. pylori with laminin could further disorganize the gastric epithelium. Trust et al. (101) showed that the interaction of H. pylori with laminin was rapid (15 to 30 min), of high affinity (Kd = 7.9 nM), and partially reversible. Since the binding was affected by salt, it suggested the presence of a hydrophobic component in this interaction (101).
Valkonen et al. (105) indicated that although all H. pylori strains tested bound laminin, hemagglutinating strains were good binders of laminin (maximum, 31%) compared to nonhemagglutinating strains (minimum, 6%). In their study, H. pylori purified LPS could inhibit the binding of laminin to H. pylori. Laminin binding was inhibited by homologous and also heterologous smooth-form LPS. Interestingly, nonhemagglutinating strains bind laminin with a higher affinity (Kd = 4.1 pM) than do hemagglutinating strains (Kd = 8.5 pM) but more binding sites are available on the surface of hemagglutinating strains, thereby explaining the higher extent of laminin binding by these strains (104). Thus, the hydrophobic surface- exposed component responsible for laminin binding previously described by Trust et al. (101) was shown to be attributable in part to LPS. The ability of heterologous rough LPS to produce inhibition comparable to that caused by smooth LPS indicated that the O side chain was not involved in the interaction. In fact, using dephosphorylated LPS, isolated core oligosaccharides, and free lipid A in inhibitory experiments for the studied hemagglutinating and poorly hemagglutinating strains, a phosphorylated structure and a conserved nonphosphorylated structure in the core oligosaccharide mediated the interaction, respectively. Scatchard plot analysis of data for the laminin binding by LPS indicated the presence of a single class of binding molecules with a dissociation constant of 2.5 nM. The authors postulated that the initial recognition and binding of laminin by H. pylori could occur through LPS and that subsequently a more specific interaction involving a lectin-like protein present on the bacterial cell surface could take place.
Slomiany et al. (90) demonstrated that H. pylori cells, in particular H. pylori LPS, inhibited the interaction between a laminin receptor in gastric epithelial cells and laminin. They isolated from rat gastric epithelial cell membranes a protein of 67 kDa that was shown to bind laminin. This protein receptor incorporated in liposomes displayed specific binding toward laminin, and the reaction was inhibited by LPS from H. pylori. A similar process may account for the loss of mucosal integrity in the pathogenesis of H. pylori-associated gastric disease. The subsequent disruption of epithelial cell- basement membrane interaction by LPS would explain the development and gradual loss of mucosal integrity during H. pylori infection (68).
A laminin-binding protein was identified on H. pylori (106). Inhibition of laminin binding by fetuin, but not asialofetuin, and reduced bacterial binding to periodate- or sialidase-treated laminin confirmed earlier results indicating that glycosylation and particularly sialylation were important for laminin binding by H. pylori. In fact, by using mono, di, and trisaccharides in inhibition experiments, it was shown that H. pylori bound to a region spanning a trisaccharide, in particular the trisaccharide N-acetylneuraminyl-(alpha-2-3)-lactose. Although LPS is involved in binding to laminin, inhibition experiments and heat and protease treatment of H. pylori cells indicated that a protein receptor, rather than LPS, on H. pylori bound this trisaccharide. Using Western blotting, a 25-kDa outer membrane protein was identified as responsible for the laminin-binding activity by both hemagglutinating and poorly hemagglutinating strains. Thus, it appears that this 25-kDa outer membrane protein acts as a lectin-like molecule together with H. pylori LPS to mediate attachment to laminin.
As stated above, the lectin-binding activity to laminin may disrupt epithelial cell-basement membrane interactions and may be responsible for the epithelial leakiness typically observed in H. pylori infections. The capacity of H. pylori to rapidly, avidly, and largely irreversibly bind both type IV collagen and laminin should facilitate both initial and continued colonization of any basement membrane that becomes exposed as a result of either H. pylori-induced disruption of mucosal integrity or the loss of epithelial cells resulting from eating and drinking, for example. Furthermore, the capacity to bind those proteins at both acidic and alkaline pH should promote the continued colonization of any ulcerative lesions formed in either the acidic stomach or the alkaline duodenum. Laminin binding may enable the pathogen to survive in chronically inflamed tissue.
Plasminogen receptors are present on leukocytes, platelets, and the cell surface of several bacterial pathogens (50). Cell surface-bound plasminogen is easily activated to plasmin. Binding and activation of human plasminogen on the surface of bacterial cells is a common mechanism used by certain invasive bacteria to facilitate movement through normal tissue barriers (50). This provides the bacterium with a potent serine protease that has a broad enzyme specificity and may contribute to tissue breakdown, facilitating the invasion of H. pylori through the gastric epithelium as well as providing nutrients. It could enable bacterial pathogens to utilize the ECM proteins to penetrate infected tissue and be disseminated. In fact, degradation of matrix proteins is required to facilitate the movement of cells through tissue planes in various biological processes such as wound repair, tissue remodeling, and tumor cell metastasis (84). Bacteria able to acquire the host's enzymes with broad substrate specificity could dramatically alter the dynamics of the host-microbe relationship to favor the establishment of a long-lasting infection.
H. pylori binds to plasminogen, and the interaction is not sialic acid dependent (83). Radiolabeled plasminogen binds to hemagglutinating H. pylori strain 17874 at a high level (32%). The interaction is specific since it could not be inhibited by nonlabeled plasminogen. This interaction seems to be a common phenomenon among H. pylori strains (47). Plasminogen binding to H. pylori seems to be independent of the presence of CagA (75). The inhibition of binding by lysine and lysine analogues indicates that lysine residues are important for binding to plasminogen. It was suggested that H. pylori binds the fifth kringle structure of the plasminogen molecule. Two proteins (of 42 and 57 kDa) binding to plasminogen were identified by Pantzar et al. (75). Scatchard plot analysis revealed a unique molecule binding plasminogen with a dissociation constant of 7 x 10-7 M. No significant difference was found between binding to the spiral and the coccoid form of H. pylori (39). Conversion of H. pylori cell-bound plasminogen to plasmin in the presence of a tissue type plasminogen activator was demonstrated in vitro (Fig. 2). At the same time, receptor-bound plasmin is protected from inactivation by
2-antiplasmin. In essence, plasminogen receptors and activators turn bacteria into proteolytic organisms using a host-derived system. For H. pylori, binding is pH dependent with an optimum at pH 7. Although H. pylori survives the obligatory passage through the low pH in gastric juice, it prefers an environment close to the epithelial surface, embedded in mucus, where the pH is higher, this may account for the optimum pH observed. No activation was noted when plasminogen or tissue- type plasminogen activator was incubated with H. pylori cells alone. This indicates that H. pylori requires a host activator since it does not produce its own bacterial plasminogen activator. By using a different approach, Yarzábal et al. (112) identified a 58.9-kDa plasminogen-binding protein in a water extract of surface protein. The identified protein had a molecular mass similar to those of the proteins found in another strain of H. pylori (75).
![]() View larger version (18K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 2. H. pylori invasion model stressing the potential role of plasminogen-binding protein in facilitating movement through the gastric epithelium. Plasmin has the potential to degrade ECM protein and could permit migration of the bacteria into tissue. Cell-bound plasminogen is activated to plasmin and can no longer be inhibited by 2-antiplasmin.
|
The plasminogen binding and conversion to plasmin is the only known proteolytic activity of H. pylori (69). This proteolytic activity may enhance tissue penetration and be involved in carcinogenesis. For now, in vivo evidence for a role of plasminogen activation in pathogenesis is limited to Yersinia pestis, Borrelia, and group A streptococci (44). Experiments with H. pylori should now be conducted in animal models to evaluate the role of plasminogen binding in the pathogenesis.
Binding of vitronectin, type IV collagen, and laminin, all ECM molecules, may be important for H. pylori to protect itself from cell lysis by complement or from other immunological effects. Ringnér et al. (83) also showed a specific, saturable, and dose- dependent binding of 125I-vitronectin to hemagglutinating H. pylori strain 17874. The reaction was pH dependent, and maximal binding was attained at pH 4. Growth conditions influenced the expression of vitronectin-binding properties, since H. pylori grown on agar bound 50% more vitronectin than did broth-cultured bacteria. Competition experiments using 125I-labeled vitronectin and plasminogen indicated that the binding sites for those molecules were different. However, they are probably close together, since nonlabeled vitronectin could inhibit the binding of 125I-plasminogen but nonlabeled plasminogen had no effect on 125I-vitronectin binding.
Although vitronectin treatment of H. pylori slightly reduced the uptake of bacteria by macrophages, the simultaneous treatment with vitronectin and complement rendered them resistant to phagocytosis (14). Whether the cell surface-bound plasmin is of any importance in the development of gastric cancer by H. pylori remains to be investigated.
|
|
|---|
For certain microorganisms, receptins binding to host proteins have recently been shown to contribute to virulence in animal models. For example, a fibrinogen-binding protein of Streptococcus equi subsp. equi was protective against a lethal challenge in mice (59). This protein was shown to bind equine fibrinogen as well as IgG and to contribute to virulence in a mouse model, since a knockout mutant, which did not express fibronectin-binding protein on the cell surface, showed a greatly decreased virulence (58). In addition, the molecule had antiphagocytic properties that could account for the virulence of S. equi subsp. equi. For Mycobacterium tuberculosis, a heparin-binding haemagglutinin adhesin markedly affected interactions of the bacteria with epithelial cells but not with macrophage-like cells (79). When administered intranasally to mice, a strain mutated for the heparin-binding protein was severely impaired in spleen colonization but not in lung colonization. Coating of wild-type mycobacteria with antibodies directed against the heparin-binding protein also prevented dissemination after intranasal infection. Thus, it appears that such a heparin- binding hemagglutinin is required for extrapulmonary dissemination of the microorganism, as revealed in the mouse model. Concerning H. pylori, it was observed that intragastric vaccination with heparan sulfate-binding protein covalently coupled to the beta-subunit of cholera toxin protected mice against a challenge with H. pylori, as revealed by microbiological, histopathological, and molecular methods (87).
The numerous receptins described for H. pylori should not be surprising since this bacterium, in order to be a long-term resident in the human host, must have the potential to express many binding molecules at different times during the infectious process and in different combinations (Fig. 3). As we have observed for this pathogen, the interactions with certain host proteins are of high affinity and therefore are most probably not negligible as a pathogenicity attribute. The multiplicity of both receptins and their respective binding molecules (ligands) allows the bacteria to survive in a very dynamic microenvironment as the infection evolves, in some instances, to an invasive stage. These adherence-penetration phenomena involve coating of the microbe with host proteins to escape the host immune system and initiate a chronic lifelong infection process.
![]() View larger version (46K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 3. Schematic representation of the binding events that could take place between H. pylori and certain host serum and ECM proteins and the inferred resulting effects on the infectious process. Once the bacterium has entered the gastric lumen, its flagella propel it into the mucus layer (step 1) and allow it to reach the apex of the gastric epithelial cells, to which it sticks via specialized adhesins (step 2). H. pylori can, using a type IV secretion system, inject CagA protein into the host cells and also release other toxic factors such as NAP and VacA. Alterations of the tight junctions and formation of large vacuoles result from VacA action. Toxic activity of VacA and of reactive oxygen intermediates produced as a result of NAP leads to a loss of integrity of the epithelial mucosal surface, by exposing molecules constituting the ECM as well as leaking of serum proteins (step 3). Tissue damage is enhanced due to loosening of the protective mucus layer and acid permeation (step 4). As in vitro studies have shown, plasminogen, after binding to the H. pylori cell surface, could, in the presence of host plasminogen activator, be transformed into plasmin (a serine protease) that could be directly involved in the degradation of various ECM proteins (including fibronectin, fibrinogen, laminin, and collagens). This host-derived proteolytic activity could be involved directly in tissue erosion (step 5). H. pylori could bind heparan sulfate (and probably heparin after release from intracellular granules) and interfere with growth factors and growth factor receptors affecting the gastric mucosa. This interaction could be involved in peptic ulcer production (step 6). The bacterium could also bind weakly to fibronectin and fibrinogen molecules and permit the establishment of a long-lasting infection (step 7). Binding to vitronectin could result in protection from complement cell lysis or other immunological effects (step 8). Laminin- binding could promote continuous colonization of basement membrane and of ulcerative lesions. It could also account for the loss of mucosal integrity observed in H. pylori infection by interfering with the reaction between the laminin receptor and laminin that accounts for the basement membrane structure (step 9). In ulcerated tissue, collagen molecules become exposed and are available to H. pylori, probably helping invasion of the lamina propria (step 10). Tissue alteration and ulceration could also lead to leakage of serum proteins following blood vessel disruption. Binding to immunoglobulins could provide the pathogen with a way to evade the host immunological defenses by interfering with opsonization, phagocytosis, and/or complement activation and comsumption. Albumin coating could also provide a mimicry stratagem so the invader is recognized as self (step 11). Taken together, those numerous reactions with host proteins would permit the establishment of a long-lasting infection, as observed for H. pylori.
|
We thank Giorgio Corsi for the artwork.
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»